Paper · 2018 · Ciência Rural

Nitrogen availability in an apple orchard with weed management

Gustavo Brunetto; Bruno Salvador Oliveira; Vítor Gabriel Ambrosini; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Weed management in apple orchards (Malus domestica) can affect the leaching of nitrogen (N) in soil. The study aimed to evaluate the potential leaching of N forms in soil of an apple orchard with different weed management treatments. The experiment was conducted in an apple orchard implanted in 2008. In October 2011, 80 plants were selected and the following treatments were implemented: no weed management (NM), desiccation of weeds on the tree row with herbicide use (DR) and mechanical mowing of weeds on the tree row (MR). Yield was evaluated in the 2011/2012, 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 crop seasons. In May 2012 porous cup lysimeters were installed in the NM, DR and MR treatments. In the solution collected at 0.20m, NH4 +-N and NO3 --N were analyzed sixteen times and mineral N concentration was calculated. The highest concentrations of NO3 --N and mineral N occurred in soil solution with DR, which increases availability of the nutrient to apple trees, but also enhances the potential losses. Weed management and N flow in the solution did not affect apple yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Desiccation of tree-row weeds with herbicide gave the highest NO3--N and mineral N concentrations in orchard soil solution, increasing N availability to apple trees but also the potential losses.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
desiccation of weeds on the tree row with herbicide use (DR)e2
Outcome
concentrations of NO3 --N and mineral Ne1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
but also enhances the potential lossese1
Comparator
no weed management (NM)e2
Setting
apple orcharde3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management in apple orchards (Malus domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 10–61 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest concentrations of NO3 --N and mineral N occurred in soil solution with DR, which increases availability of the nutrient to apple trees, but also enhances the potential losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1011 · show in text ↑
e2

“no weed management (NM), desiccation of weeds on the tree row with herbicide use (DR) and mechanical mowing of weeds on the tree row (MR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–537 · show in text ↑
e3

“The experiment was conducted in an apple orchard implanted in 2008”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management did not affect apple yield, and N flow in the soil solution did not affect it either.

Treatment
Weed managemente4
Outcome
apple yielde4
Direction
did not affecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Weed management and N flow in the solution did not affect apple yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1082 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.