Paper · 1974 · Australian Journal of Agricultural Research

Some effects of urea and Streptomyces griseus (2-A24) on Fusarium avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc

JF Kollmorgen

4
claims
19
verbatim quotes
3
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of urea on the pathogenicity of Fusavium avenaceum (Fr.) Sacc, to wheat and of Steptomyces griseus (2-A24) and urea on the survival of F. avenaceum were examined. In pot experiments, urea amendments increased the severity of symptoms and reduced the dry weight and height of infected seedlings. Survival of F. avenaceum in oaten straw artificially infected with the fungus was studied in gamma-irradiated soil and in gamma-irradiated soil recontaminated with the original microflora. Over the test periods of 17 and 34 weeks, a urea amendment reduced survival only in the recontaminated soil, whereas S. griseus (2-A24) did so in both soils, the reduction being greater in the absence of other microflora.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea increased symptoms in infected wheat seedlings.

Treatment
urea amendmentse0
Interactor
Fusavium avenaceume2pathogene3
Outcome
severity of symptomse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“urea amendments increased the severity of symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–245 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“Fusavium avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e3

“pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea reduced dry weight and height of infected wheat seedlings.

Treatment
urea amendmentse2
Interactor
Fusavium avenaceume3pathogene4
Outcome
dry weight and heighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the dry weight and height of infected seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“urea amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–210 · show in text ↑
e3

“Fusavium avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea reduced F. avenaceum survival only in recontaminated soil.

Treatment
urea amendmente0
Interactor
F. avenaceumFusarium avenaceume3pathogene4
Outcome
survival of F. avenaceume2
Direction
reducede0
Setting
recontaminated soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a urea amendment reduced survival only in the recontaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–603 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“survival of F. avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–159 · show in text ↑
e3

“survival of F. avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. griseus reduced F. avenaceum survival in both soils, more strongly without other microflora.

Treatment
S. griseus (2-A24)e0
Interactor
F. avenaceumFusarium avenaceume3pathogene4
Second interactor
S. griseus (2-A24)Streptomyces griseuse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
survival of F. avenaceume2
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Streptomyces griseus
Streptomyces griseus · Second interactorDocwarhol · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S. griseus (2-A24) did so in both soils, the reduction being greater in the absence of other microflora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–716 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 78–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“survival of F. avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–159 · show in text ↑
e3

“survival of F. avenaceum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–159 · show in text ↑
e4

“pathogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–35 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 23 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

other · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

other · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

114 papers: 100 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

110 papers more in this group

See all 114 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 426 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.