Paper · 2007 · Agronomy Journal

Planting Date and Nitrogen Effects on Fusarium Head Blight and Leaf Spotting Diseases in Spring Wheat

K. D. Subedi; B. L. Ma; A. G. Xue

13
claims
21
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cultural management practices play important roles in minimizing losses caused by Fusarium head blight (FHB) and leaf spotting diseases (leaf‐spot) in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.). A field experiment was conducted in Ottawa, Canada, for 3 yr (2003–2005) in two sites representing clay loam and sandy loam soils to examine the effects of planting date and N management on the incidence and severity of FHB and leaf‐spot {tan spot, Septoria leaf blotch and Stagonospora nodorum blotch) in spring wheat. The cultivar AC Brio was seeded at three dates at approximately 10‐d intervals starting in the last week of April. The five N treatments included 0, 60, and 100 kg N ha −1 applied as starter; 60 + 40 kg N ha −1 (starter + top‐dress at boot stage); and 60 + 40 kg N ha −1 (starter + foliar spray at boot stage). Generally, incidence of FHB and severity of leaf‐spot were greater in the heavy‐textured soil than in the light‐textured soil. Across site–year, the incidence of FHB ranged from 13 to 45%, and severity varied from 14 and 52%. On both soils, planting date had a consistently greater effect on the incidence and severity of FHB: the later the planting date beyond 9 May, the greater the incidence of FHB. The late‐planted wheat also had the greatest severity of leaf‐spot. Planting after 9 May also significantly reduced grain yield by 15 to 45%. Wheat grown without added N had the greatest incidence of FHB and leaf‐spot severities than that supplied with adequate N, especially in the heavy‐textured soil. The effect of N on FHB was not consistent over site–years, but leaf‐spot was significantly reduced with a starter application of N at 100 kg ha −1 . Our data indicate that environmental variation induced by different planting dates or by different growing seasons and site appeared to have greater effects on FHB and leaf‐spot in wheat than N application. The results suggest that the incidence of FHB and severity of leaf‐spot in spring wheat can be minimized through early planting combined with adequate starter N application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FHB incidence was generally greater in heavy- than light-textured soil.

Outcome
incidence of FHBe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
light‐textured soile0
Setting
heavy‐textured soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incidence of FHB and severity of leaf‐spot were greater in the heavy‐textured soil than in the light‐textured soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–939 · show in text ↑
e1

“in spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–501 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf-spot severity was generally greater in heavy- than light-textured soil.

Outcome
severity of leaf‐spote0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
light‐textured soile0
Setting
heavy‐textured soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“incidence of FHB and severity of leaf‐spot were greater in the heavy‐textured soil than in the light‐textured soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–939 · show in text ↑
e1

“in spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FHB incidence across site-years ranged from 13 to 45%.

Outcome
incidence of FHBe0
Value
13 to 45%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Across site–year, the incidence of FHB ranged from 13 to 45%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–1000 · show in text ↑
e1

“in spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–501 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FHB severity across site-years ranged from 14 to 52%.

Outcome
severitye0
Value
14 and 52%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severity varied from 14 and 52%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“in spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting after 9 May increased FHB incidence.

Treatment
planting date beyond 9 Maye0
Outcome
incidence of FHBe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the later the planting date beyond 9 May, the greater the incidence of FHB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1215 · show in text ↑
e1

“in spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late planting produced the greatest leaf-spot severity.

Treatment
late‐plantede0
Outcome
severity of leaf‐spote0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The late‐planted wheat also had the greatest severity of leaf‐spot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting after 9 May significantly reduced grain yield by 15 to 45%.

Treatment
Planting after 9 Maye0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15 to 45%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Planting after 9 May also significantly reduced grain yield by 15 to 45%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1357 · show in text ↑
e1

“in spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat without added nitrogen had more FHB than wheat with adequate nitrogen.

Treatment
without added Ne0
Outcome
incidence of FHBe0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
adequate Ne0
Setting
heavy‐textured soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grown without added N had the greatest incidence of FHB and leaf‐spot severities than that supplied with adequate N, especially in the heavy‐textured soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat without added nitrogen had more severe leaf spot than wheat with adequate nitrogen.

Treatment
without added Ne0
Outcome
leaf‐spot severitiese0
Direction
greateste0
Comparator
adequate Ne0
Setting
heavy‐textured soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grown without added N had the greatest incidence of FHB and leaf‐spot severities than that supplied with adequate N, especially in the heavy‐textured soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1519 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of nitrogen on FHB was inconsistent across site-years.

Outcome
effect of N on FHBe0
Qualifier
not consistent over site–yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of N on FHB was not consistent over site–years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1577 · show in text ↑
e1

“in spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Starter nitrogen at 100 kg ha −1 significantly reduced leaf spot.

Treatment
starter application of N at 100 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
leaf‐spote0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf‐spot was significantly reduced with a starter application of N at 100 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1583–1666 · show in text ↑
e1

“in spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–501 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting date and season or site variation appeared to affect wheat diseases more than nitrogen application.

Outcome
FHB and leaf‐spote0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
N applicatione0
Setting
different growing seasons and sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“environmental variation induced by different planting dates or by different growing seasons and site appeared to have greater effects on FHB and leaf‐spot in wheat than N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1692–1875 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend early planting with adequate starter nitrogen to minimize FHB incidence and leaf-spot severity.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
early planting combined with adequate starter N applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the incidence of FHB and severity of leaf‐spot in spring wheat can be minimized through early planting combined with adequate starter N application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1901–2049 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 23 positive, 29 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

sowing time · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 14 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.