Abstract
Abstract Establishment of undersown white clover was unaffected by differences in sowing rate of ‘Aotea’ wheat between 50 and 150 kg/ha. Clover sown with wheat in June established at a higher density than when overdrilled the following spring. Irrigation increased the survival of undersown clover without increasing plant size. It is suggested that the growth of irrigated clover was restricted by low light intensity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
White clover establishment was unaffected by Aotea wheat sowing rates of 50 to 150 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- white clover
Trifolium repense0 - Treatment
- sowing rate of ‘Aotea’ wheat between 50 and 150 kg/hae0
- Outcome
- Establishment of undersown white clovere0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
- Comparator
- differences in sowing ratee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Establishment of undersown white clover was unaffected by differences in sowing rate of ‘Aotea’ wheat between 50 and 150 kg/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Clover sown with wheat in June established at a higher density than clover overdrilled the following spring.
- Taxon
- white clover
Trifolium repenst0 - Treatment
- sown with wheat in Junee0
- Outcome
- densitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- overdrilled the following springe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Clover sown with wheat in June established at a higher density than when overdrilled the following spring.”
t0“undersown white clover”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased survival of undersown clover.
- Taxon
- white clover
Trifolium repenst0 - Treatment
- Irrigatione0
- Outcome
- survival of undersown clovere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation increased the survival of undersown clover without increasing plant size.”
t0“undersown white clover”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation did not increase undersown clover plant size.
- Taxon
- white clover
Trifolium repenst0 - Treatment
- Irrigatione0
- Outcome
- plant sizee0
- Direction
- without increasinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Irrigation increased the survival of undersown clover without increasing plant size.”
t0“undersown white clover”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors suggest low light intensity restricted growth of irrigated clover.
- Taxon
- white clover
Trifolium repenst0 - Outcome
- growth of irrigated clovere0
- Direction
- restrictede0
- Qualifier
- low light intensitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“It is suggested that the growth of irrigated clover was restricted by low light intensity.”
t0“undersown white clover”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results
2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
irrigation · survival · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
density · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- no effect
irrigation · growth · Trifolium repens (white clover)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.