Paper · 1981 · Canadian Journal of Botany

Growth stimulation of apple trees in unsterilized soil under field conditions with VA mycorrhiza inoculation

Christian Plenchette; Valentin Furlan; J. André Fortin

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
74
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Apple seedlings germinated and grown under greenhouse conditions were inoculated with endomycorrhizal roots originating from a nursery grown Fraxinus prior to outplanting into unsterilized field soil. Uninoculated seedlings, in soil either unamended or amended with 100 kg/ha P as superphosphate, were controls. Shoot length, leaf surface, root volume, stem diameter, and dry mass of inoculated plants were all significantly greater than both fertilized and unfertilized controls. No significant difference could be observed in foliar mineral content but the level of N, P, Ca, Cu, and possibly K were higher in the roots of inoculated plants than in controls. Although shoot length of the phosphorus fertilized plants exceeded that of the unfertilized controls (p < 0.05), all the other growth parameters remained unchanged by the addition of P. Intracortical vesicles were absent or very uncommon in the roots of both fertilized and unfertilized control plants whereas they were very abundant in the roots of inoculated plants.It is concluded that inoculation of seedlings previous to field planting in unsterilized phosphorus-poor soil can lead to a significant growth stimulation in spite of the presence of a natural endomycorrhizal flora.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated apple seedlings had greater shoot length, leaf area, root volume, stem diameter and dry mass than both controls.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Shoot length, leaf surface, root volume, stem diameter, and dry masse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
both fertilized and unfertilized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shoot length, leaf surface, root volume, stem diameter, and dry mass of inoculated plants were all significantly greater than both fertilized and unfertilized controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–480 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar mineral content did not differ significantly.

Outcome
foliar mineral contente0
Direction
No significant differencee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“No significant difference could be observed in foliar mineral content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root N, P, Ca, Cu and possibly K were higher in inoculated plants.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
level of N, P, Ca, Cu, and possibly Ke0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“the level of N, P, Ca, Cu, and possibly K were higher in the roots of inoculated plants than in controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–659 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus fertilization increased shoot length over unfertilized control.

Treatment
phosphorus fertilized plantse0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
exceedede0
Comparator
unfertilized controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“shoot length of the phosphorus fertilized plants exceeded that of the unfertilized controls (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other growth parameters were unchanged after phosphorus addition.

Treatment
addition of Pe0
Outcome
other growth parameterse0
Direction
unchangede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“all the other growth parameters remained unchanged by the addition of P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–845 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intracortical vesicles were abundant in inoculated roots but absent or uncommon in controls.

Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
Intracortical vesiclese0
Direction
very abundante0
Comparator
both fertilized and unfertilized control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–33 · show in text ↑
e0

“Intracortical vesicles were absent or very uncommon in the roots of both fertilized and unfertilized control plants whereas they were very abundant in the roots of inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1028 · show in text ↑

inoculation · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 10 positive, 4 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

inoculation · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 31 positive, 11 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

fertilization · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 90 positive, 16 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.