Paper · 1959 · Journal of Economic Entomology

The Effectiveness of Some Insecticides on Several Vegetable Crops1

John R. Young; L. P. Ditman

11
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Six insecticides were tested on vegetable crops for phytotoxicity, effectiveness against insects, and effect on flavor and quality of some of the crops. At rates below those usually recommended, Thiodan® (6,7,8,9,10,10-hexaehloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a,-hexahydro- 6, 9- methano-2, 4, 3-benzodioxatheipin-3-oxide), ethion, malathion, Dibrom® (O,O-dimethyl-O-(1, 2-dibromo-2, 2-dichloroethyl) phosphate), Sevin® (N-methyl-1-naphthyl carbamate), and Trithion® (S-(p-chlorophinylthio) methyl O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioate) showed no phytotoxicity to cucumber, cantaloupe, tomato, potato, snap bean, lima bean, cabbage, and eggplant. Yields from eggplant and cabbage were significantly in- creased by sprays of Thiodan, ethion, malathion, Dibrom, and Trithion. Yields of cabbage were significantly increased by Sevin. Yields of tomato, potato, cucumber, and cantaloupe were not significantly increased by any of the insecticides. All materials used were highly effective against the eggplant lace bug, (Gargaphia solani Heid.), the margined blister beetle (Epicauta pestifera Werner), the cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni (Hbn.)). the imported cabbageworm (Pieris rapae (L.)), the potato leafhopper (Empoasca fabae (Harris)), and the Mexican bean beetle (Epilachna varivestis Muls.). Thiodan was most effective against the cabbage flea beetle (Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze)) and the corn earworm (Heliothis zea (Boddie)). Sevin was effective against the melon aphid (Aphis gossypii Glov.) but not the potato aphid (Macrosiphum solanifolii (Ashm.). Trithion and ethion were highly effective against the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus telarius (L.)). Thiodan and Trithion gave excellent control of the potato aphid. No off-flavors were detected in any of the crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six insecticides showed no phytotoxicity on eight vegetable crops at low rates.

Taxon
Vegetable Cropst0
Treatment
Thiodan®e0
Outcome
phytotoxicitye0
Direction
no phytotoxicitye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“At rates below those usually recommended, Thiodan® (6,7,8,9,10,10-hexaehloro-1,5,5a,6,9,9a,-hexahydro- 6, 9- methano-2, 4, 3-benzodioxatheipin-3-oxide), ethion, malathion, Dibrom® (O,O-dimethyl-O-(1, 2-dibromo-2, 2-dichloroethyl) phosphate), Sevin® (N-methyl-1-naphthyl carbamate), and Trithion® (S-(p-chlorophinylthio) methyl O,O-diethyl phosphorodithioate) showed no phytotoxicity to cucumber, cantaloupe, tomato, potato, snap bean, lima bean, cabbage, and eggplant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Five sprays significantly increased eggplant and cabbage yields.

Treatment
sprays of Thiodan, ethion, malathion, Dibrom, and Trithione0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
in- creasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields from eggplant and cabbage were significantly in- creased by sprays of Thiodan, ethion, malathion, Dibrom, and Trithion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin significantly increased cabbage yield.

Treatment
Sevine0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of cabbage were significantly increased by Sevin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No tested insecticide significantly increased tomato, potato, cucumber, or cantaloupe yields.

Treatment
insecticidese0
Outcome
Yieldse0
Direction
not significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yields of tomato, potato, cucumber, and cantaloupe were not significantly increased by any of the insecticides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–917 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All materials were highly effective against six named insect pests.

Taxon
Vegetable Cropst0
Treatment
All materials usede0
Interactor
eggplant lace buge0pest
Outcome
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“All materials used were highly effective against the eggplant lace bug, (Gargaphia solani Heid.), the margined blister beetle (Epicauta pestifera Werner), the cabbage looper (Trichoplusia ni (Hbn.)). the imported cabbageworm (Pieris rapae (L.)), the potato leafhopper (Empoasca fabae (Harris)), and the Mexican bean beetle (Epilachna varivestis Muls.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 918–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiodan was most effective against cabbage flea beetle and corn earworm.

Taxon
Vegetable Cropst0
Treatment
Thiodane0
Interactor
cabbage flea beetlee0pest
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Thiodan was most effective against the cabbage flea beetle (Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze)) and the corn earworm (Heliothis zea (Boddie)).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin was effective against melon aphid.

Taxon
Vegetable Cropst0
Treatment
Sevine0
Interactor
melon aphidAphis gossypiie0pest
Outcome
effective against the melon aphide0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Aphis gossypii
Aphis gossypii · InteractorDr Lewis Wilson, CSIRO · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sevin was effective against the melon aphid (Aphis gossypii Glov.) but not the potato aphid (Macrosiphum solanifolii (Ashm.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sevin was ineffective against potato aphid.

Taxon
Vegetable Cropst0
Treatment
Sevine0
Interactor
potato aphide0pest
Outcome
not the potato aphide0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Sevin was effective against the melon aphid (Aphis gossypii Glov.) but not the potato aphid (Macrosiphum solanifolii (Ashm.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1535 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trithion and ethion were highly effective against two-spotted spider mite.

Taxon
Vegetable Cropst0
Treatment
Trithion and ethione0
Interactor
two-spotted spider mitee0pest
Outcome
highly effectivee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Trithion and ethion were highly effective against the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus telarius (L.)).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1536–1642 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiodan and Trithion gave excellent potato aphid control.

Taxon
Vegetable Cropst0
Treatment
Thiodan and Trithione0
Interactor
potato aphide0pest
Outcome
excellent control of the potato aphide0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Thiodan and Trithion gave excellent control of the potato aphid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No off-flavors were detected in crops.

Taxon
Vegetable Cropst0
Outcome
No off-flavorse0

Verbatim

e0

“No off-flavors were detected in any of the crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1708–1757 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–65 · show in text ↑

malathion · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

malathion · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

29 papers: 22 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

insecticide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

32 papers: 22 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

insecticide · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

insecticide · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 74 positive, 3 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

application · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

110 papers: 104 positive, 6 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.