Paper · 2005 · Agronomy Journal

Early‐Season Applications of Sulfur Fertilizers Increase Potato Yield and Reduce Tuber Defects

Alexander D. Pavlista

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
36
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sulfur recommendations are based on avoiding deficiency. Since S may have additional effects, the objective was to determine whether S fertilizers increase yield and reduce tuber defects. Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) cultivar Atlantic was treated with wettable sulfur (WS), ammonium sulfate (AS), and ammonium thiosulfate (TS) at 0, 28, 56, 84, and 112 kg S ha −1 applied at planting [in‐furrow (IF)], 11 d later [pre‐emergence (PE)], 11 d after emergence [postemergence (PT)], and at tuber initiation (TI). Separate trials were conducted for each fertilizer and application. Ammonium nitrate and urea were added to AS and TS to equalize N. Yield of U.S. “A” potato was increased 11 to 34% by fertilizers at S rates greater than 56 kg ha −1 at IF, PT, and by AS and WS at TI. These fertilizers applied IF and at TI reduced the incidence of common scab ( Streptomyces scabies ) on tubers. When applied PT, AS and TS reduced common scab; WS did not. The incidence of black scurf ( Rhizoctonia solani ) on tubers was reduced when AS and TS were applied PT but not when applied IF and at TI. Pre‐emergence application had no effect. Other tuber characteristics, e.g., specific gravity and vascular discoloration, were unaffected. Plant growth was inhibited by TS applied after emergence but recovered. Yield was increased by S at 56 kg ha −1 applied IF, PT, and at TI except for TS applied at TI. Common scab and black scurf were reduced depending on application timing and fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilizers above 56 kg ha−1 increased U.S. A potato yield by 11 to 34% at in-furrow and postemergence timings, and AS and WS at tuber initiation.

Treatment
fertilizers at S rates greater than 56 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
Yield of U.S. “A” potatoe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11 to 34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of U.S. “A” potato was increased 11 to 34% by fertilizers at S rates greater than 56 kg ha −1 at IF, PT, and by AS and WS at TI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–777 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur fertilizers applied in-furrow and at tuber initiation reduced common scab on tubers.

Treatment
fertilizers applied IF and at TIe0
Interactor
Streptomyces scabiesStreptomyces scabieie0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of common scabe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These fertilizers applied IF and at TI reduced the incidence of common scab ( Streptomyces scabies ) on tubers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence AS and TS reduced common scab.

Treatment
AS and TSe0
Outcome
common scabe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied PT, AS and TS reduced common scab; WS did not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence WS did not reduce common scab.

Treatment
WSe0
Outcome
common scabe0
Direction
did note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied PT, AS and TS reduced common scab; WS did not.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence AS and TS reduced black scurf, unlike in-furrow and tuber-initiation application.

Treatment
AS and TS were applied PTe0
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of black scurfe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
applied IF and at TIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of black scurf ( Rhizoctonia solani ) on tubers was reduced when AS and TS were applied PT but not when applied IF and at TI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1089 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-emergence application had no effect.

Treatment
Pre‐emergence applicatione0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pre‐emergence application had no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific gravity and vascular discoloration were unaffected.

Treatment
Sulfur Fertilizerst1
Outcome
specific gravity and vascular discoloratione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other tuber characteristics, e.g., specific gravity and vascular discoloration, were unaffected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
t1

“Sulfur Fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TS applied after emergence temporarily inhibited plant growth.

Treatment
TS applied after emergencee0
Outcome
Plant growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant growth was inhibited by TS applied after emergence but recovered.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1299 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur at 56 kg ha−1 increased yield when applied in-furrow, postemergence, or at tuber initiation, except TS at tuber initiation.

Treatment
S at 56 kg ha −1 applied IF, PT, and at TIe0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was increased by S at 56 kg ha −1 applied IF, PT, and at TI except for TS applied at TI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1300–1394 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 · show in text ↑

thiosulfate · growth · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

ammonium sulfate · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sulfur atom · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

herbicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

61 papers: 40 positive, 21 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

450 papers: 394 positive, 56 negative or no effect

393 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

446 papers more in this group

See all 450 papers →

herbicide · Rhizoctonia solani · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · Streptomyces scabiei · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.