Paper · 1993 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of sulfur, calcium, and boron on tissue nutrient concentration and potato yield1

Umesh C. Gupta; J. B. Sanderson

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field studies were conducted over three years on Podzol soils in Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.) on the effect of sulfur (S), calcium (Ca), and boron (B) fertilization on tissue nutrient concentration and potato yield. Leaf tissues were sampled at 10% bloom and again two weeks later for S, Ca, and B analysis. In the absence of S fertilization, S deficiency symptoms, as evidenced by lighter green foliage were found. The mean tuber yield response due to S addition was 1.1 (SE = 0.40) t/ha. Addition of S either as gypsum or magnesium sulfate was effective in overcoming the S deficiency symptoms and in increasing the S concentration in the leaves. Calcium and B additions did not affect the tuber yields. While Ca applications were ineffective in increasing the Ca concentration in the leaf tissue, B applications significantly increased the leaf tissue B concentration in both samplings. The interaction effects between S, Ca, and B were not significant on any of the components tested. Data indicated that 0.25 to 0.27 and 0.28 to 0.32% S in potato leaves were in the S deficiency and sufficiency range, respectively. This is the first documented case of S deficiency in the field in P.E.I. Potatoes and possibly other crops should be monitored for S‐deficiency symptoms and S levels in plant tissues should be recorded to detect any trends.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur addition increased potato tuber yield by a mean of 1.1 t/ha compared with no sulfur fertilization.

Treatment
S additione1
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Value
1.1 (SE = 0.40) t/hae1
Comparator
absence of S fertilizatione2
Setting
Prince Edward Islande3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“The mean tuber yield response due to S addition was 1.1 (SE = 0.40) t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–498 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the absence of S fertilization, S deficiency symptoms, as evidenced by lighter green foliage were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–424 · show in text ↑
e3

“Field studies were conducted over three years on Podzol soils in Prince Edward Island (P.E.I.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur added as gypsum or magnesium sulfate increased the sulfur concentration in potato leaves compared with no sulfur fertilization.

Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
gypsum or magnesium sulfatee1
Outcome
S concentratione1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
absence of S fertilizatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of S either as gypsum or magnesium sulfate was effective in overcoming the S deficiency symptoms and in increasing the S concentration in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–657 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the absence of S fertilization, S deficiency symptoms, as evidenced by lighter green foliage were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur added as gypsum or magnesium sulfate overcame the sulfur deficiency symptoms in potato.

Treatment
gypsum or magnesium sulfatee1
Outcome
S deficiency symptomse2
Comparator
absence of S fertilizatione2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of S either as gypsum or magnesium sulfate was effective in overcoming the S deficiency symptoms and in increasing the S concentration in the leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–657 · show in text ↑
e2

“In the absence of S fertilization, S deficiency symptoms, as evidenced by lighter green foliage were found”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium applications were ineffective in increasing the calcium concentration in potato leaf tissue.

Organ / stage
leaf tissuee1
Treatment
Ca applicationse1
Outcome
Ca concentration in the leaf tissuee1
Direction
ineffective in increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“While Ca applications were ineffective in increasing the Ca concentration in the leaf tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron applications significantly increased the boron concentration in potato leaf tissue in both samplings.

Organ / stage
leaf tissuee1
Treatment
B applicationse1
Outcome
B concentratione1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in both samplingse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“B applications significantly increased the leaf tissue B concentration in both samplings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–898 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium and boron additions did not affect potato tuber yield.

Treatment
Calcium and B additionse1
Outcome
tuber yieldse1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“Calcium and B additions did not affect the tuber yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction effects between sulfur, calcium and boron were not significant on any of the components tested in potato.

Treatment
S, Ca, and Be1
Outcome
interaction effectse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction effects between S, Ca, and B were not significant on any of the components tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–997 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potato leaves with 0.25 to 0.27% S were in the S deficiency range and those with 0.28 to 0.32% S were in the sufficiency range.

Outcome
S in potato leavese1
Value
0.25 to 0.27 and 0.28 to 0.32%e1
Qualifier
deficiency and sufficiency range, respectivelye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Data indicated that 0.25 to 0.27 and 0.28 to 0.32% S in potato leaves were in the S deficiency and sufficiency range, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1129 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field S deficiency recorded in Prince Edward Island was the first documented case of such deficiency in the field there.

Outcome
S deficiencye1
Setting
P.E.I.e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
e1

“This is the first documented case of S deficiency in the field in P.E.I.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1203 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Potatoes and possibly other crops should be monitored, and plant tissue S levels recorded, to detect S deficiency trends.

Taxon
PotatoesSolanum tuberosume1
Outcome
S levels in plant tissuese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Potatoes and possibly other crops should be monitored”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1257 · show in text ↑
e2

“S levels in plant tissues should be recorded to detect any trends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1353 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

boron atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

26 papers: 21 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

magnesium sulfate · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

magnesium sulfate · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

calcium atom · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

boron atom · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

lime · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.