Paper · 2013 · Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova

Influence of Rhizobacteria Inoculation and Lead Stress on the Physiological and Biochemical Attributes of Wheat Genotypes

M. Janmohammadi; M.R. Bihamta; F. Ghasemzadeh

10
claims
40
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Contamination of soils by lead (Pb) is of widespread occurrence as result of human, agricultural and industrial activities. A pot study was carried out to evaluate physio-biochemical responses (chlorophyll content, soluble protein, proline content and activities of enzymatic antioxidants) of 10 bread wheat genotypes to inoculation of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (combination of Azospirillum brasilense and Azotobacter chroococcum) under Pb stress (0 and 65 mg kg -1 ). Result revealed that lead stress averagely decreased grain yield of wheat cultivars by 41.4 %. Lead stress increased lipid peroxidation and induced a significant accumulation of proline in leaves. Protein content decreased from 8-25.4% in different cultivars in Pbcontaminated soils. Activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as, ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalase were significantly increased in the presence of lead. An increase in total hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) content was noticed under lead stress in all cultivars, which was similar to production of malondialdehyde (MDA). However, promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation, since plant growth promoting rhizobacteria could improve grain yield, proline content and membrane integrity, while significantly reduced the production of MDA and H 2 O 2 . Total chlorophyll content considerably declined with Pb stress. Between cultivars the best performance under lead stress was observed in Sardari, Shahriyar and Gaspard which had the highest yield and antioxidants activity. Obtained results showed that inoculation with Azotobacter and Azospirillium possibly through bioremediation strategy can stimulate plant growth under adverse environmental conditions, such as heavy metal contamination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead stress decreased wheat grain yield by 41.4%.

Treatment
lead stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
41.4 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lead stress averagely decreased grain yield of wheat cultivars by 41.4 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead stress increased lipid peroxidation and leaf proline.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Lead stresse0
Outcome
lipid peroxidation and induced a significant accumulation of proline in leavese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lead stress increased lipid peroxidation and induced a significant accumulation of proline in leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content fell by 8–25.4% in lead contaminated soils.

Treatment
Pbcontaminated soilse0
Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8-25.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content decreased from 8-25.4% in different cultivars in Pbcontaminated soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–772 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activities increased significantly with lead.

Treatment
leade0
Outcome
Activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as, ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as, ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase and catalase were significantly increased in the presence of lead.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 773–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead stress increased hydrogen peroxide and malondialdehyde.

Treatment
lead stresse0
Outcome
total hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“An increase in total hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) content was noticed under lead stress in all cultivars, which was similar to production of malondialdehyde (MDA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1090 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacterial inoculation promoted growth in most cultivars.

Treatment
rhizobacterial inoculatione0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria improved yield, proline content and membrane integrity.

Treatment
plant growth promoting rhizobacteriae0
Outcome
grain yield, proline content and membrane integritye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant growth promoting rhizobacteria could improve grain yield, proline content and membrane integrity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1306 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobacteria reduced MDA and hydrogen peroxide production.

Treatment
rhizobacterial inoculatione1
Outcome
production of MDA and H 2 O 2e0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly reduced the production of MDA and H 2 O 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1369 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll declined under lead stress.

Treatment
Pb stresse0
Outcome
Total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll content considerably declined with Pb stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sardari, Shahriyar and Gaspard had the highest yield and antioxidant activity under lead stress.

Material
Sardari, Shahriyar and Gasparde0
Outcome
yield and antioxidants activitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sardari, Shahriyar and Gaspard which had the highest yield and antioxidants activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
t1

“Wheat Genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“promotion of growth was evident in most cultivars as a consequence of rhizobacterial inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1196 · show in text ↑

lead atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

lead atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

heavy metal · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 3 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 2 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 5 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

inoculation · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 47 positive, 3 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

inoculation · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

42 papers: 42 positive, 0 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.