Paper · 2019 · Physiologia Plantarum

Responses of nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide in regulating oxidative defence system in wheat plants grown under cadmium stress

Cengiz Kaya; Muhammad Ashraf; Mohammed Nasser Alyemeni; et al.

20
claims
39
verbatim quotes
277
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We conducted a study to evaluate the interactive effect of NO and H 2 S on the cadmium (Cd) tolerance of wheat. Cadmium stress considerably reduced total dry weight, chlorophyll a and b content and ratio of Fv/Fm by 36.7, 48.6, 26.7 and 19.5%, respectively, but significantly enhanced the levels of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and malondialdehyde (MDA), endogenous H 2 S and NO, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes. Exogenously applied sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%, chlorophyll b content by 29.1 and 27.2%, Fv/Fm ratio by 19.7 and 15.2%, respectively, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes, but lowered oxidative stress and proline content in Cd‐stressed wheat plants. NaHS and SNP also considerably limited both the uptake and translocation of Cd, thereby improving the levels of some key mineral nutrients in the plants. Enhanced levels of NO and H 2 S induced by NaHS were reversed by hypotuarine application, but they were substantially reduced almost to 50% by cPTIO (a NO scavenger) application. Hypotuarine was not effective, but cPTIO was highly effective in reducing the levels of NO and H 2 S produced by SNP in the roots of Cd‐stressed plants. The results showed that interactive effect of NO and H 2 S can considerably improve plant resistance against Cd toxicity by reducing oxidative stress and uptake of Cd in plants as well as by enhancing antioxidative defence system and uptake of some essential mineral nutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced wheat total dry weight by 36.7%.

Treatment
Cadmium stresse0
Outcome
total dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
36.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium stress considerably reduced total dry weight, chlorophyll a and b content and ratio of Fv/Fm by 36.7, 48.6, 26.7 and 19.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced wheat chlorophyll a by 48.6%.

Treatment
Cadmium stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium stress considerably reduced total dry weight, chlorophyll a and b content and ratio of Fv/Fm by 36.7, 48.6, 26.7 and 19.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced wheat chlorophyll b by 26.7%.

Treatment
Cadmium stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and b contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
26.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium stress considerably reduced total dry weight, chlorophyll a and b content and ratio of Fv/Fm by 36.7, 48.6, 26.7 and 19.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced wheat Fv/Fm by 19.5%.

Treatment
Cadmium stresse0
Outcome
ratio of Fv/Fme0
Direction
reducede0
Value
19.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cadmium stress considerably reduced total dry weight, chlorophyll a and b content and ratio of Fv/Fm by 36.7, 48.6, 26.7 and 19.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–256 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress enhanced wheat peroxide, MDA, endogenous H2S and NO levels and antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
Cadmium stresse1
Outcome
levels of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and malondialdehyde (MDA), endogenous H 2 S and NO, and the activities of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly enhanced the levels of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) and malondialdehyde (MDA), endogenous H 2 S and NO, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cadmium stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP enhanced dry matter of cadmium-stressed wheat by 47.8%.

Treatment
sodium nitroprusside (SNP)e0
Outcome
total plant dry mattere0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
47.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenously applied sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS enhanced dry matter of cadmium-stressed wheat by 39.1%.

Treatment
sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS)e0
Outcome
total plant dry mattere0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
39.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exogenously applied sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP enhanced wheat chlorophyll a by 92.3%.

Treatment
sodium nitroprusside (SNP)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
92.3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS enhanced wheat chlorophyll a by 61.5%.

Treatment
sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll ae0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
61.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP enhanced wheat chlorophyll b by 29.1%.

Treatment
sodium nitroprusside (SNP)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll b contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
29.1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%, chlorophyll b content by 29.1 and 27.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS enhanced wheat chlorophyll b by 27.2%.

Treatment
sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll b contente0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
27.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%, chlorophyll b content by 29.1 and 27.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP enhanced wheat Fv/Fm by 19.7%.

Treatment
sodium nitroprusside (SNP)e0
Outcome
Fv/Fm ratioe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
19.7e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%, chlorophyll b content by 29.1 and 27.2%, Fv/Fm ratio by 19.7 and 15.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS enhanced wheat Fv/Fm by 15.2%.

Treatment
sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS)e0
Outcome
Fv/Fm ratioe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
15.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%, chlorophyll b content by 29.1 and 27.2%, Fv/Fm ratio by 19.7 and 15.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities and reduced oxidative stress and proline in cadmium-stressed wheat.

Treatment
sodium nitroprusside (SNP)e0
Outcome
activities of antioxidant enzymese0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%, chlorophyll b content by 29.1 and 27.2%, Fv/Fm ratio by 19.7 and 15.2%, respectively, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes, but lowered oxidative stress and proline content in Cd‐stressed wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities and reduced oxidative stress and proline in cadmium-stressed wheat.

Treatment
sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS)e0
Outcome
oxidative stress and proline contente0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), donors of NO and H 2 S, respectively, enhanced total plant dry matter by 47.8 and 39.1%, chlorophyll a by 92.3 and 61.5%, chlorophyll b content by 29.1 and 27.2%, Fv/Fm ratio by 19.7 and 15.2%, respectively, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes, but lowered oxidative stress and proline content in Cd‐stressed wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NaHS and SNP limited cadmium uptake and translocation, improving key mineral nutrient levels in wheat.

Treatment
NaHS and SNPe0
Outcome
uptake and translocation of Cde0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NaHS and SNP also considerably limited both the uptake and translocation of Cd, thereby improving the levels of some key mineral nutrients in the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypotuarine reversed NaHS-induced NO and H2S increases in wheat.

Treatment
hypotuarine applicatione0
Outcome
levels of NO and H 2 Se0
Direction
reversede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enhanced levels of NO and H 2 S induced by NaHS were reversed by hypotuarine application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1073 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO reduced NaHS-induced NO and H2S levels by almost 50% in wheat.

Treatment
cPTIO (a NO scavenger) applicatione0
Outcome
theye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
almost to 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they were substantially reduced almost to 50% by cPTIO (a NO scavenger) application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypotuarine did not effectively reduce SNP-produced NO and H2S in cadmium-stressed wheat roots.

Treatment
Hypotuarinee0
Outcome
levels of NO and H 2 Se0
Direction
not effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hypotuarine was not effective, but cPTIO was highly effective in reducing the levels of NO and H 2 S produced by SNP in the roots of Cd‐stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

cPTIO effectively reduced SNP-produced NO and H2S in cadmium-stressed wheat roots.

Treatment
cPTIOe0
Outcome
levels of NO and H 2 Se0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hypotuarine was not effective, but cPTIO was highly effective in reducing the levels of NO and H 2 S produced by SNP in the roots of Cd‐stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 · show in text ↑

sodium nitroprusside · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 35 positive, 0 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

38 papers: 35 positive, 3 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

sodium atom · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

sodium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 9 positive, 6 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

hydrosulfide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sodium atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

hydrosulfide · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.