Paper · 1995 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of peduncle‐perfused nitrogen, sucrose, and growth regulators on barley and wheat amino acid composition

B.L. Ma; L.M. Dwyer; S. Leibovitch; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen (N) or growth regulator application to small grain cereals near anthesis has been demonstrated to alter grain fill and grain yield, the protein yield and nutritional quality may also be modified by these management factors. The objective of this study was to determine whether delivery of N, growth regulator, or sucrose solutions into greenhouse‐grown barley (Hordeurn vulgare L. cv. Leger) or wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Katepwa), plants through peduncle perfusion altered the amino acid composition of the grain. The following treatments were tested: N (25 and 50 mM), chlormequat (30 μM), ethephon (15 μM), N + chlormequat, N + ethephon, detillering + N, sucrose (250 mM), distilled water check, and non‐perfused check. Perfusion lasted 30 d beginning 5 to 8 d after spike emergence. Addition of N via peduncle perfusion increased protein concentrations and concentrations of all amino acids in both barley and wheat when expressed in terms of grain dry matter. Protein yield and lysine content were also increased. However, the increase in essential amino acids such as lysine, methionine, threonine, isoleucine, arginine, and leucine was relatively small, and the proportions of these amino acids in the grain protein were actually reduced. The sucrose treatment only affected wheat, increasing lysine concentration and decreasing the total protein concentration. Growth regulators used in this study did not alter protein yield or amino acid composition in either crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen peduncle perfusion increased grain protein and amino acid concentrations per dry matter in barley.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
N via peduncle perfusione0
Outcome
protein concentrations and concentrations of all amino acidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of N via peduncle perfusion increased protein concentrations and concentrations of all amino acids in both barley and wheat when expressed in terms of grain dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen peduncle perfusion increased grain protein and amino acid concentrations per dry matter in wheat.

Organ / stage
graine0
Treatment
N via peduncle perfusione0
Outcome
protein concentrations and concentrations of all amino acidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of N via peduncle perfusion increased protein concentrations and concentrations of all amino acids in both barley and wheat when expressed in terms of grain dry matter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen perfusion increased protein yield in both barley and wheat.

Treatment
Ne1
Outcome
Protein yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein yield and lysine content were also increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“both barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen perfusion increased lysine content in both barley and wheat.

Treatment
N via peduncle perfusione2
Outcome
lysine contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein yield and lysine content were also increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“both barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–942 · show in text ↑
e2

“Addition of N via peduncle perfusion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen perfusion reduced the proportions of six named essential amino acids in grain protein.

Treatment
N via peduncle perfusione3
Outcome
proportions of these amino acids in the grain proteine0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
lysine, methionine, threonine, isoleucine, arginine, and leucinee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the proportions of these amino acids in the grain protein were actually reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1268 · show in text ↑
e1

“lysine, methionine, threonine, isoleucine, arginine, and leucine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1161 · show in text ↑
e2

“both barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–942 · show in text ↑
e3

“Addition of N via peduncle perfusion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose perfusion increased lysine concentration in wheat.

Treatment
sucrose treatmente0
Outcome
lysine concentratione0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sucrose treatment only affected wheat, increasing lysine concentration and decreasing the total protein concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose perfusion decreased total protein concentration in wheat.

Treatment
sucrose treatmente0
Outcome
total protein concentratione0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sucrose treatment only affected wheat, increasing lysine concentration and decreasing the total protein concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth regulators did not alter protein yield or amino acid composition in barley.

Treatment
Growth regulatorse0
Outcome
protein yield or amino acid compositione0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth regulators used in this study did not alter protein yield or amino acid composition in either crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1498 · show in text ↑
e1

“both barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth regulators did not alter protein yield or amino acid composition in wheat.

Treatment
Growth regulatorse0
Outcome
protein yield or amino acid compositione0
Direction
did not altere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth regulators used in this study did not alter protein yield or amino acid composition in either crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1498 · show in text ↑
e1

“both barley and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–942 · show in text ↑

sucrose · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

sucrose · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

class · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

class · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 66 positive, 6 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.