Abstract
Abstract The efficacies of calcium lactate and chlorine washing treatments of fresh‐cut lettuce and carrots were compared during storage at 4 °C over 10 days. The gas composition of packages, colour, enzyme activity, texture, sensory attributes, microflora and levels of ascorbic acid and carotenoids were evaluated at 1, 3, 7 and 10 days. Calcium lactate treatment was not significantly different to chlorine treatment ( p < 0.05) in terms of maintaining colour, texture and acceptability of fresh‐cut lettuce and carrots during the entire storage period. The washing treatments did not affect levels of ascorbic acid of fresh‐cut lettuce or carrots. Carotenoid levels were higher in calcium lactate‐treated carrots than chlorine‐treated samples at the end of storage. Mesophilic, psychrotrophic and lactic acid bacteria counts were not significantly different between treatments for both vegetables. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Calcium lactate and chlorine washes did not differ in maintaining colour, texture and acceptability of fresh-cut lettuce and carrots
- Taxon
- lettuce and carrots
Daucus carota
Lactuca sativae0 - Treatment
- calcium lactatee5
- Outcome
- colour, texture and acceptabilitye1
- Direction
- not significantly differente5
- Comparator
- chlorinee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The efficacies of calcium lactate and chlorine washing treatments of fresh‐cut lettuce and carrots were compared”
e1“in terms of maintaining colour, texture and acceptability of fresh‐cut lettuce and carrots”
e5“Calcium lactate treatment was not significantly different to chlorine treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Washing treatments did not affect ascorbic acid levels of fresh-cut lettuce or carrots
- Taxon
- lettuce or carrots
Daucus carota
Lactuca sativae2 - Treatment
- washing treatmentse2
- Outcome
- levels of ascorbic acide2
- Direction
- did not affecte2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e2“The washing treatments did not affect levels of ascorbic acid of fresh‐cut lettuce or carrots”
Claim · model-written summary
Carotenoid levels were higher in calcium lactate-treated carrots than in chlorine-treated carrots at the end of storage
- Taxon
- carrots
Daucus carotae3 - Treatment
- calcium lactatee3
- Outcome
- Carotenoid levelse3
- Direction
- highere3
- Qualifier
- at the end of storagee3
- Comparator
- chlorinee3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“Carotenoid levels were higher in calcium lactate‐treated carrots than chlorine‐treated samples at the end of storage”
Claim · model-written summary
Microbial counts did not differ between washing treatments for fresh-cut lettuce and carrots
- Taxon
- lettuce and carrots
Daucus carota
Lactuca sativae0 - Treatment
- calcium lactate and chlorine washing treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Mesophilic, psychrotrophic and lactic acid bacteria countse4
- Direction
- not significantly differente4
- Comparator
- between treatmentse4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“The efficacies of calcium lactate and chlorine washing treatments of fresh‐cut lettuce and carrots were compared”
e4“Mesophilic, psychrotrophic and lactic acid bacteria counts were not significantly different between treatments for both vegetables”
The same questions in other papers
lactate · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
calcium atom · quality: postharvest · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
calcium atom · molecular: metabolites · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
calcium atom · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →calcium atom · physiology: pigments · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
dichlorine · molecular: metabolites · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
processing · quality: phytochemicals · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →processing · molecular: metabolites · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.