Paper · 2007 · Journal of Herbs Spices & Medicinal Plants

Control of Cultivated Cowpea Pests with Mixtures of Extracts from Piper guineense and Other Plants

A. M. Oparaeke; M. C. Dike; C. I. Amatobi

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT The insecticidal activity of Piper guineense Schum & Thonn extracts mixed with extracts of other plant species was tested on Maruca vitrata Fab. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and the coried bug, Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stal. (Hemiptera: Coreidae), two major post-flowering cowpea [Vigna vitrata (L.) Walp.] pests. Extracts of Piper guineense mixed with extracts of Allium sativum L., Azadirachta indica A. Juss, and Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A. Rich provided effective pest control, leading to significant reductions in the population of the test pests as compared with untreated controls. In 2 years of study, the extract mixtures also resulted in significant reduction of pod damage on the cowpea and grain yields comparable with plants treated with a synthetic insecticide. The observations demonstrate the potential use of P. guineense in mixtures with other plants for protecting field cow-pea against M. vitrata and C. tomentosicollis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixtures of Piper guineense with other plant extracts significantly reduced Maruca vitrata populations versus untreated controls.

Treatment
Extracts of Piper guineense mixed with extracts of Allium sativum L., Azadirachta indica A. Juss, and Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A. Riche0
Interactor
Maruca vitrataMaruca vitratae1pest
Outcome
population of the test pestse0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Maruca vitrata
Maruca vitrata · InteractorRavi Vaidyanathan · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts of Piper guineense mixed with extracts of Allium sativum L., Azadirachta indica A. Juss, and Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A. Rich provided effective pest control, leading to significant reductions in the population of the test pests as compared with untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cultivated Cowpea Pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maruca vitrata Fab. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and the coried bug, Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The extract mixtures significantly reduced Clavigralla tomentosicollis populations versus untreated controls.

Treatment
Extracts of Piper guineense mixed with extracts of Allium sativum L., Azadirachta indica A. Juss, and Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A. Riche0
Interactor
Clavigralla tomentosicollisClavigralla tomentosicollise1pest
Outcome
population of the test pestse0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
untreated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Extracts of Piper guineense mixed with extracts of Allium sativum L., Azadirachta indica A. Juss, and Xylopia aethiopica (Dunal) A. Rich provided effective pest control, leading to significant reductions in the population of the test pests as compared with untreated controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–598 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cultivated Cowpea Pests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Clavigralla tomentosicollis Stal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–232 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract mixtures significantly reduced cowpea pod damage over two years.

Treatment
extract mixturese0
Outcome
pod damagee0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
2 yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2 years of study, the extract mixtures also resulted in significant reduction of pod damage on the cowpea and grain yields comparable with plants treated with a synthetic insecticide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract mixtures produced cowpea grain yields comparable with synthetic insecticide treatment.

Treatment
extract mixturese0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
plants treated with a synthetic insecticidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2 years of study, the extract mixtures also resulted in significant reduction of pod damage on the cowpea and grain yields comparable with plants treated with a synthetic insecticide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–785 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Piper guineense · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azadirachta indica · Clavigralla tomentosicollis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Azadirachta indica · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

80 papers: 78 positive, 2 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

botanical · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

126 papers: 123 positive, 3 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

botanical · Clavigralla tomentosicollis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

botanical · Maruca vitrata · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.