Paper · 2001 · Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Impact of Seed Treatment with Systemic Insecticides onCotton Leaf Curl Disease

Tariq Mehmood; Athar Nadeem; Merritt R Nelson .

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to assess the effect of seed dressing systemic insecticides on cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD) and their impact on yield components. Spread of disease and severity was comparatively lower in treated plots than untreated control. Plants grew more vigorously in imidacloprid followed by thiamethoxam treatments. Seed treatment with imidacloprid proved to be the best. Average number of bolls per plant were 16 in imidacloprid treated plots followed by 12 in thiamethoxam treated plot and 10 in non-treated control. Other yield components were also more in treated plots than untreated control. The yield was estimated to be 80% more in imidacloprid treated plot and 18% in thiamethoxam treated plot over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed treatments lowered cotton leaf curl disease spread and severity versus untreated control.

Treatment
seed dressing systemic insecticidese1
Outcome
Spread of disease and severitye0
Direction
comparatively lowere0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spread of disease and severity was comparatively lower in treated plots than untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–257 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed dressing systemic insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–88 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants grew more vigorously with imidacloprid, followed by thiamethoxam.

Treatment
imidaclopride0
Outcome
Plants grewe0
Direction
more vigorouslye0
Comparator
thiamethoxam treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grew more vigorously in imidacloprid followed by thiamethoxam treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid treated plants averaged 16 bolls per plant versus 10 in control.

Treatment
imidacloprid treated plotse0
Outcome
number of bolls per plante0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
16e0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average number of bolls per plant were 16 in imidacloprid treated plots followed by 12 in thiamethoxam treated plot and 10 in non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam treated plants averaged 12 bolls per plant versus 10 in control.

Treatment
thiamethoxam treated plote0
Outcome
number of bolls per plante0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
12e0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average number of bolls per plant were 16 in imidacloprid treated plots followed by 12 in thiamethoxam treated plot and 10 in non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid increased estimated yield by 80% over control.

Treatment
imidacloprid treated plote0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
80%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield was estimated to be 80% more in imidacloprid treated plot and 18% in thiamethoxam treated plot over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam increased estimated yield by 18% over control.

Treatment
thiamethoxam treated plote0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield was estimated to be 80% more in imidacloprid treated plot and 18% in thiamethoxam treated plot over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–60 · show in text ↑

thiamethoxam · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

imidacloprid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

insecticide · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

seed treatment · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.