Paper · 2013 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

CAPILLARY ZONE ELECTROPHORESIS FOR DETERMINATION OF REDUCED AND OXIDISED ASCORBATE AND GLUTATHIONE IN ROOTS AND LEAF SEGMENTS OF Zea mays PLANTS EXPOSED TO Cd AND Cu

Sławomir Dresler; Waldemar Maksymiec

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The concentration of non-enzymatic antioxidants such as ascorbate and glutathione in tissues is one of the major plant responses to biotic and many abiotic stresses, including metals. Therefore, it is crucial to develop the most effective methods for simultaneous quantitative analysis of these antioxidants. Capillary zone electrophoresis allows relatively fast and effective analysis. The aim of the paper was to apply and optimise the capillary electrophoresis conditions for simultaneous determination of glutathione, glutathione disulphide, ascorbate, and dehydroascorbate in small plant tissue samples exposed to copper and cadmium. The method ensures good linearity and reproducibility, with correlation coefficients 0.988 for ascorbate and 0.999 for glutathione and glutathione disulphide, and with detection limits approximately 2.50, 0.65 and 0.50 ppm, respectively. Cu stress was found to increase the ascorbate concentration and glutathione content in leaves, while Cd increased glutathione in the oldest leaf segments and root.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate measurement had correlation coefficient 0.988.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Outcome
correlation coefficientse0
Value
0.988e0
Comparator
ascorbatee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“correlation coefficients 0.988 for ascorbate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–743 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione and glutathione disulphide measurement had correlation coefficient 0.999.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Outcome
glutathione and glutathione disulphidee0
Value
0.999e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“0.999 for glutathione and glutathione disulphide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascorbate detection limit was approximately 2.50 ppm.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Outcome
detection limitse0
Value
2.50e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“detection limits approximately 2.50, 0.65 and 0.50 ppm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione detection limit was approximately 0.65 ppm.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Outcome
detection limitse0
Value
0.65e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“detection limits approximately 2.50, 0.65 and 0.50 ppm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione disulphide detection limit was approximately 0.50 ppm.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Outcome
detection limitse0
Value
0.50 ppme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“detection limits approximately 2.50, 0.65 and 0.50 ppm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper stress increased leaf ascorbate concentration and glutathione content.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
Cu stresse0
Outcome
ascorbate concentration and glutathione contente0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cu stress was found to increase the ascorbate concentration and glutathione content in leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–970 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased glutathione in the oldest leaf segments.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Organ / stage
oldest leaf segmentse0
Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
glutathionee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd increased glutathione in the oldest leaf segments and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium increased root glutathione.

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayst0
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
Cde0
Outcome
glutathionee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cd increased glutathione in the oldest leaf segments and root”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Zea mays”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–137 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

48 papers: 12 positive, 36 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

copper atom · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

heavy metal · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 5 positive, 17 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.