Paper · 2014 · Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo

Soil fertility, nutrition and yield of maize and barley with gypsum application on soil surface in no-till

Leandro Michalovicz; Marcelo Marques Lopes Müller; José Salvador Simoneti Foloni; et al.

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Annual crop yield and nutrition have shown differentiated responses to modifications in soil chemical properties brought about by gypsum application. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of gypsum application rates on the chemical properties of a Latossolo Bruno (Clayey Oxisol), as well as on the nutrition and yield of a maize-barley succession under no-till. The experiment was set up in November 2009 in Guarapuava, Parana, Brazil, applying gypsum rates of 0.0, 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 6.0 Mg ha-1 to the soil surface upon sowing maize, with crop succession of barley. Gypsum application decreased the levels of Al3+ and Mg2+ in the 0.0-0.1 m layer and increased soil pH in the layers from 0.2-0.6 m depth. Gypsum application has increased the levels of Ca2+ in all soil layers up to 0.6 m, and the levels of S-SO4(2-) up to 0.8 m. In both crops, the leaf concentrations of Ca and S were increased while Mg concentrations have decreased as a function of gypsum rates. There was also an effect of gypsum rates on grain yield, with a quadratic response of maize and a linear increase for barley. Yield increases were up to 11 and 12 % in relation to control for the maximum technical efficiency (MTE) rates of 3.8 and 6.0 Mg ha-1 of gypsum, respectively. Gypsum application improved soil fertility in the profile, especially in the subsurface, as well as plant nutrition, increasing the yields of maize and barley.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum decreased soil aluminum and magnesium in the surface layer.

Taxon
maize and barleyHordeum vulgareZea mayst0
Treatment
Gypsum applicatione0
Outcome
levels of Al3+ and Mg2+e0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
0.0-0.1 m layere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum application decreased the levels of Al3+ and Mg2+ in the 0.0-0.1 m layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–659 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased deeper soil pH.

Taxon
maize and barleyHordeum vulgareZea mayst0
Treatment
Gypsum applicatione0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0.2-0.6 m depthe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum application decreased the levels of Al3+ and Mg2+ in the 0.0-0.1 m layer and increased soil pH in the layers from 0.2-0.6 m depth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum raised soil calcium through 0.6 m.

Taxon
maize and barleyHordeum vulgareZea mayst0
Treatment
Gypsum applicatione0
Outcome
levels of Ca2+e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to 0.6 me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum application has increased the levels of Ca2+ in all soil layers up to 0.6 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum raised soil sulfate through 0.8 m.

Taxon
maize and barleyHordeum vulgareZea mayst0
Treatment
Gypsum applicatione0
Outcome
levels of S-SO4(2-)e0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
up to 0.8 me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum application has increased the levels of Ca2+ in all soil layers up to 0.6 m, and the levels of S-SO4(2-) up to 0.8 m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased leaf calcium and sulfur in both crops.

Taxon
maize and barleyHordeum vulgareZea mayst0
Treatment
gypsum ratese0
Outcome
leaf concentrations of Ca and Se0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both crops, the leaf concentrations of Ca and S were increased while Mg concentrations have decreased as a function of gypsum rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum decreased leaf magnesium in both crops.

Taxon
maize and barleyHordeum vulgareZea mayst0
Treatment
gypsum ratese0
Outcome
Mg concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both crops, the leaf concentrations of Ca and S were increased while Mg concentrations have decreased as a function of gypsum rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize and barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–55 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain yield responded quadratically to gypsum rates.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
gypsum ratese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
quadratic responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was also an effect of gypsum rates on grain yield, with a quadratic response of maize and a linear increase for barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1104 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley grain yield increased linearly with gypsum rates.

Treatment
gypsum ratese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
linear increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was also an effect of gypsum rates on grain yield, with a quadratic response of maize and a linear increase for barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield increased up to 11% at 3.8 Mg ha-1 gypsum.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
3.8 and 6.0 Mg ha-1 of gypsume0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
11 and 12 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increases were up to 11 and 12 % in relation to control for the maximum technical efficiency (MTE) rates of 3.8 and 6.0 Mg ha-1 of gypsum, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley yield increased up to 12% at 6.0 Mg ha-1 gypsum.

Treatment
3.8 and 6.0 Mg ha-1 of gypsume0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
12 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield increases were up to 11 and 12 % in relation to control for the maximum technical efficiency (MTE) rates of 3.8 and 6.0 Mg ha-1 of gypsum, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑

lime · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

42 papers: 36 positive, 6 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

lime · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

54 papers: 53 positive, 1 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 71 positive, 24 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

lime · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

219 papers: 185 positive, 34 negative or no effect

184 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

215 papers more in this group

See all 219 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.