Paper · 2008 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Lime Effects on Soil Acidity, Crop Yield, and Aluminum Chemistry in Direct‐Seeded Cropping Systems

Tabitha T. Brown; Richard T. Koenig; David R. Huggins; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
144
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Soil acidification threatens dryland crop production in the inland Pacific Northwest (IPNW). Our objective was to assess the efficacy of lime to lower soil acidity, alter Al chemistry, and increase crop yield in a direct‐seeded system. Treatments of subsurface banded fertilizer (120–168 kg N ha −1 yr −1 ) alone or with subsurface banded lime (224 kg ha −1 yr −1 ), or a one‐time broadcast application of lime (7000 kg ha −1 ) or elemental S (1000 kg ha −1 ) were initiated in spring 2002. Grain yield was measured annually from 2002 to 2005 in a spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation. Soil was sampled in spring 2004 to assess pH and model Al speciation. Low pH was evident at the depth of fertilizer placement (5–10 cm). Broadcast lime increased pH in the surface 15 cm, although reductions in Al 3+ activity [(Al 3+ )] occurred only in the 0‐ to 5‐cm layer. Relative to banded N, there was no increase in pH at the 5‐ to 10‐cm depth where banded lime was placed. At the 0‐ to 5‐cm depth, lower pHs were observed with broadcast S (4.6) compared with the banded N control (5.1) or banded lime (5.0). There was no effect of treatment on yield. Modeling suggests that soluble Al is dominated by organic matter–Al complexes (fulvic acid, FA; FA 2 Al + and FA 2 AlOH 0 ). Solid‐ and solution‐phase organic complexes may control (Al 3+ ) at pH <5.5. Although acidification is a concern in the IPNW, the high organic matter content in direct‐seeded soils may buffer against Al phytotoxicity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low pH occurred at fertilizer placement depth.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Outcome
Low pHe0
Setting
depth of fertilizer placement (5–10 cm)e0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low pH was evident at the depth of fertilizer placement (5–10 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–780 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast lime raised pH in the upper 15 cm of soil.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
Broadcast limee0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
surface 15 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast lime increased pH in the surface 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–829 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast lime reduced Al3+ activity only in the upper 5 cm of soil.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree2
Treatment
Broadcast limee1
Outcome
Al 3+ activitye0
Direction
reductionse0
Setting
0‐ to 5‐cm layere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions in Al 3+ activity [(Al 3+ )] occurred only in the 0‐ to 5‐cm layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–917 · show in text ↑
e1

“Broadcast lime increased pH in the surface 15 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–829 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banded lime did not increase pH at placement depth relative to banded nitrogen.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
banded limee0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
no increasee0
Comparator
banded Ne0
Setting
5‐ to 10‐cm depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to banded N, there was no increase in pH at the 5‐ to 10‐cm depth where banded lime was placed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1023 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast sulfur produced lower pH than banded nitrogen control or banded lime in the upper 5 cm.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
broadcast Se0
Outcome
pHse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4.6e0
Qualifier
5.1e0
Comparator
banded N controle0
Setting
0‐ to 5‐cm depthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 0‐ to 5‐cm depth, lower pHs were observed with broadcast S (4.6) compared with the banded N control (5.1) or banded lime (5.0).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1158 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–642 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment did not affect grain yield in the barley and wheat rotation.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Treatment
treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no effect of treatment on yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1201 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield was measured annually from 2002 to 2005 in a spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–643 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Modeling suggested soluble aluminum was dominated by organic matter aluminum complexes.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Compound
organic matter–Al complexese0
Outcome
soluble Ale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Modeling suggests that soluble Al is dominated by organic matter–Al complexes (fulvic acid, FA; FA 2 Al + and FA 2 AlOH 0 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1326 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–642 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Solid and solution organic complexes may control Al3+ activity below pH 5.5.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Compound
organic complexese0
Outcome
(Al 3+ )e0
Qualifier
at pH <5.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solid‐ and solution‐phase organic complexes may control (Al 3+ ) at pH <5.5.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1403 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–642 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

High organic matter in direct-seeded soil may buffer crops against aluminum phytotoxicity.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree1
Compound
organic mattere0
Outcome
Al phytotoxicitye0
Qualifier
direct‐seeded soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the high organic matter content in direct‐seeded soils may buffer against Al phytotoxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1543 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)–winter wheat rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–642 · show in text ↑

transplanting · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

lime · soil: chemistry · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.