Paper · 2025 · Scientia Agricola

Boron rates and residual effect of gypsum on soil chemical attributes and barley yield

Tiago José Bombardelli; Renan Caldas Umburanas; Edson Lucas Camilo; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

ABSTRACT Studies on barley management practices are scarce, and farmers have employed boron (B) fertilization without technical criteria, relying primarily on field reports of yield gains. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of B fertilization of barley cultivars (cv.) under the residual effect of phosphogypsum. The experiment was started in 2009 using a randomized block design, with rates of 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 Mg[gypsum] ha–1 for a long-term study. The plots were divided into four sections in the 2021 and 2022 winter seasons, each receiving a different B rate: 0, 1, 2, and 4 kg[B] ha–1 as boric acid (H3BO3). The barley cv. Danielle and Imperatriz were then sown in these sections. The data were analyzed using a split-split plot design. The yield components and grain yield were evaluated in Nov 2021 and 2022, while the soil was sampled following the barley harvest in 2022. The residual effects of gypsum on the evaluated soil chemical properties were nearly negligible, except for the yield of cv. Imperatriz, which exhibited an increase with gypsum rates in 2021, while no yield response was observed for cv. Danielle (2021 and 2022). The B fertilization increased soil-B availability and the yield of cv. Danielle in 2021 and 2022, while cv. Imperatriz exhibited an increase in yield only in the 2021 season. The cv. Imperatriz exhibited a higher yield than cv. Danielle in 2021 and 2022 seasons, with an increase of 18 % on average. The increases in soil B content (0.37 - 0.45 mg[B] dm–3) and in grain yield as a result of B fertilization of barley cv. Danielle (+17 – 87 %) and Imperatriz (up to +6 %) indicate that the current critical soil B level (0.3 mg[B] dm–3) should be reevaluated in the southern states in Brazil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual gypsum had nearly negligible effects on evaluated soil chemical properties.

Treatment
gypsume0
Outcome
evaluated soil chemical propertiese0
Direction
nearly negligiblee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effects of gypsum on the evaluated soil chemical properties were nearly negligible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum rates increased Imperatriz yield in 2021.

Material
Imperatrize0
Treatment
gypsum ratese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
2021e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of cv. Imperatriz, which exhibited an increase with gypsum rates in 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Danielle yield showed no gypsum response in 2021 and 2022.

Material
Daniellee0
Treatment
gypsume1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no yield responsee0
Qualifier
2021 and 2022e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no yield response was observed for cv. Danielle (2021 and 2022)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1150 · show in text ↑
e1

“The residual effects of gypsum on the evaluated soil chemical properties were nearly negligible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron fertilization increased soil boron availability.

Treatment
B fertilizatione0
Outcome
soil-B availabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B fertilization increased soil-B availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron fertilization increased Danielle yield in 2021 and 2022 by 17–87%.

Material
Daniellee0
Treatment
B fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
+17 – 87 %e1
Qualifier
2021 and 2022e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The B fertilization increased soil-B availability and the yield of cv. Danielle in 2021 and 2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1248 · show in text ↑
e1

“Danielle (+17 – 87 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1594 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron fertilization increased Imperatriz yield only in 2021, by up to 6%.

Material
Imperatrize0
Treatment
B fertilizatione2
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
up to +6 %e1
Qualifier
2021 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cv. Imperatriz exhibited an increase in yield only in the 2021 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1325 · show in text ↑
e1

“Imperatriz (up to +6 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1622 · show in text ↑
e2

“The B fertilization increased soil-B availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1201 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imperatriz yielded 18% more than Danielle on average in 2021 and 2022.

Material
Imperatrize0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
18 %e0
Qualifier
2021 and 2022 seasonse0
Comparator
Daniellee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cv. Imperatriz exhibited a higher yield than cv. Danielle in 2021 and 2022 seasons, with an increase of 18 % on average”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1450 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend reevaluating the 0.3 mg[B] dm–3 critical soil B level in southern Brazil.

Outcome
current critical soil B levele0
Value
0.3 mg[B] dm–3e0
Setting
southern states in Brazile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the current critical soil B level (0.3 mg[B] dm–3) should be reevaluated in the southern states in Brazil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1742 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–86 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

lime · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

54 papers: 53 positive, 1 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.