Paper · 2011 · Agronomy Journal

Agronomic Performance of Cropping Systems with Contrasting Crop Rotations and External Inputs

Jeffrey A. Coulter; Craig C. Sheaffer; Donald L. Wyse; et al.

16
claims
20
verbatim quotes
62
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cropping systems with less reliance on external inputs could improve agricultural sustainability if they can produce high and stable crop yields over time. A 16‐yr experiment was conducted in southwestern Minnesota to evaluate the effects of zero external input (ZEI), low external input (LEI), high external input (HEI), and organic input (OI) systems on crop yield and yield stability in a 2‐yr soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.]–corn ( Zea mays L.) rotation and a 4‐yr oat ( Avena sativa L.)/alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.)–alfalfa–corn–soybean rotation. Oat yield was stable and highest with the LEI, HEI, and OI systems. Alfalfa yield was highest with the LEI, HEI, and OI systems in the first 8 yr and the OI system in the last 8 yr. Corn grain yield was 0, 13, 26, and 40% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation in the HEI, LEI, OI, and ZEI systems, respectively, and was greatest with the HEI system in the 2‐yr rotation and the LEI, HEI, and OI systems in the 4‐yr rotation. Soybean yield was 7% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation and was among the highest with the LEI and HEI systems. Stable corn and soybean yields occurred with the LEI and OI systems, while above‐average yield increases under favorable growing conditions occurred with the LEI and HEI systems in alfalfa and the HEI system in corn. These results demonstrate the value of extended crop rotations for corn and soybean, and that high crop yields can be obtained with reduced‐input systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat yield was stable and highest with the LEI, HEI and OI systems in southwestern Minnesota.

Treatment
LEI, HEI, and OI systemse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
stablee1
Setting
southwestern Minnesotae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conducted in southwestern Minnesota”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 179–214 · show in text ↑
e1

“Oat yield was stable and highest with the LEI, HEI, and OI systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–621 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa yield was highest with the LEI, HEI and OI systems in the first 8 years.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
LEI, HEI, and OI systemse2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in the first 8 yre2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Alfalfa yield was highest with the LEI, HEI, and OI systems in the first 8 yr and the OI system in the last 8 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alfalfa yield was highest with the OI system in the last 8 years.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativae2
Treatment
OI systeme2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
in the last 8 yre2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Alfalfa yield was highest with the LEI, HEI, and OI systems in the first 8 yr and the OI system in the last 8 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was 0% greater with the 4-year rotation than the 2-year rotation in the HEI system.

Treatment
4‐yr rotatione3
Outcome
Corn grain yielde3
Direction
greatere3
Value
0e3
Qualifier
HEIe3
Comparator
2‐yr rotatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Corn grain yield was 0, 13, 26, and 40% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation in the HEI, LEI, OI, and ZEI systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was 13% greater with the 4-year rotation than the 2-year rotation in the LEI system.

Treatment
4‐yr rotatione3
Outcome
Corn grain yielde3
Direction
greatere3
Value
13e3
Qualifier
LEIe3
Comparator
2‐yr rotatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Corn grain yield was 0, 13, 26, and 40% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation in the HEI, LEI, OI, and ZEI systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was 26% greater with the 4-year rotation than the 2-year rotation in the OI system.

Treatment
4‐yr rotatione3
Outcome
Corn grain yielde3
Direction
greatere3
Value
26e3
Qualifier
OIe3
Comparator
2‐yr rotatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Corn grain yield was 0, 13, 26, and 40% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation in the HEI, LEI, OI, and ZEI systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was 40% greater with the 4-year rotation than the 2-year rotation in the ZEI system.

Treatment
4‐yr rotatione3
Outcome
Corn grain yielde3
Direction
greatere3
Value
40%e3
Qualifier
ZEIe3
Comparator
2‐yr rotatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Corn grain yield was 0, 13, 26, and 40% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation in the HEI, LEI, OI, and ZEI systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–881 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was greatest with the HEI system in the 2-year rotation.

Treatment
HEI systeme5
Outcome
Corn grain yielde3
Direction
greateste5
Qualifier
2‐yr rotatione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Corn grain yield was 0, 13, 26, and 40% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation in the HEI, LEI, OI, and ZEI systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–881 · show in text ↑
e5

“and was greatest with the HEI system in the 2‐yr rotation and the LEI, HEI, and OI systems in the 4‐yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield was greatest with the LEI, HEI and OI systems in the 4-year rotation.

Treatment
LEI, HEI, and OI systemse5
Outcome
Corn grain yielde3
Direction
greateste5
Qualifier
4‐yr rotatione5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Corn grain yield was 0, 13, 26, and 40% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation in the HEI, LEI, OI, and ZEI systems, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–881 · show in text ↑
e5

“and was greatest with the HEI system in the 2‐yr rotation and the LEI, HEI, and OI systems in the 4‐yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–994 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was 7% greater with the 4-year rotation than the 2-year rotation.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
4‐yr rotatione6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
greatere6
Value
7%e6
Comparator
2‐yr rotatione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Soybean yield was 7% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1070 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was among the highest with the LEI and HEI systems.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
LEI and HEI systemse7
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
among the higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Soybean yield was 7% greater with the 4‐yr rotation than the 2‐yr rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1070 · show in text ↑
e7

“was among the highest with the LEI and HEI systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stable corn and soybean yields occurred with the LEI and OI systems.

Treatment
LEI and OI systemse1
Outcome
Stable corn and soybean yieldse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Stable corn and soybean yields occurred with the LEI and OI systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1194 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increases under favorable growing conditions occurred with the LEI and HEI systems in alfalfa.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Treatment
LEI and HEI systemse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
under favorable growing conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“yield increases under favorable growing conditions occurred with the LEI and HEI systems in alfalfa and the HEI system in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increases under favorable growing conditions occurred with the HEI system in corn.

Treatment
HEI systeme1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
under favorable growing conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“yield increases under favorable growing conditions occurred with the LEI and HEI systems in alfalfa and the HEI system in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1342 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Extended crop rotations are valuable for corn and soybean.

Treatment
extended crop rotationse1
Outcome
value of extended crop rotationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“These results demonstrate the value of extended crop rotations for corn and soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1427 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High crop yields can be obtained with reduced-input systems.

Taxon
crope1
Treatment
reduced‐input systemse1
Outcome
high crop yieldse1

Verbatim

e1

“high crop yields can be obtained with reduced‐input systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1497 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

76 papers: 65 positive, 11 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

organic · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

rotation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 107 positive, 37 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Soybean yield was not reduced in LEI four-year rotation over 16 years.

    Productivity, Economics, and Soil Quality in the Minnesota Variable‐Input Cropping Systems Trial · 2013 · compared with high external input (HEI) 2‐year rotation

    No difference from an alternativeCites this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

rotation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 254 positive, 68 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 330 positive, 43 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

organic · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.