Paper · 2014 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of dual-purpose summer legumes and zinc fertilization on system productivity, economics and nutrient use-efficiencies of rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system

S L JAT; Y S SHIVAY; C M PARIHAR

17
claims
36
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2007-09 at the research farm of IARI, New Delhi, India; to study the effects of dual-purpose summer legumes and zinc fertilization in aromatic hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.)– wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cropping system. The higher system productivity, N and Zn uptake, nutrient-use efficiencies, net return and B:C ratio were recorded in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] or mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) residue incorporated plots. The N balance was negative (-) in all treatments but it was least negative (-) in cowpea among summer treatments followed by mungbean. The highest N and Zn uptake, system productivity in terms of grain yield, i.e. 12.32 and 12.71 tonnes/ha was observed with application of 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O). Among the Zn fertilization treatments the lowest negative (-) balance of N was recorded with control (only N), i.e. -36.92 kg/ha in 2007-08 however in 2008-09 it was recorded with coating material coated urea, i.e. -39.54 kg N/ha over rest of the Zn treatments. The application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO) gave the highest (2 696 and 2 601 g/ha during 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively) positive Zn balance under rice-wheat cropping system. Partial factor productivity, agronomic efficiency, apparent recovery and physiological efficiency of applied N and Zn in rice-wheat cropping system were increased with Zn-enriched urea. The agronomic efficiency of N with 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) increased by 49.7% and the N recovery efficiency in grain increased up to 57.6% over normal practice of prilled urea application. With the application of 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) the agronomic efficiency of Zn increased in the range of 54 to 160% while Zn apparent recovery (%) in grain increased from 70 to 318% over 2.0% ZEU (ZnO) and 5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO), respectively. The dual-purpose summer legume incorporation in rice-wheat system gave higher net returns by 29 to 34% in 2007-08 and 42 to 45% during 2008-09 over summer fallow with B:C ratio up to 3.01. The application of 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) gave the highest B:C ratio of 3.02 and increased net returns of aromatic-hybrid rice-wheat system by 11.6 to 12.2% over prilled urea application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea or mungbean residue incorporation increased system productivity, N and Zn uptake and nutrient-use efficiencies.

Treatment
cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] or mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) residue incorporatede1
Outcome
system productivity, N and Zn uptake, nutrient-use efficienciese1
Direction
highere1
Setting
research farm of IARI, New Delhi, Indiae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“The higher system productivity, N and Zn uptake, nutrient-use efficiencies, net return and B:C ratio were recorded in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] or mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) residue incorporated plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–473 · show in text ↑
e2

“A field experiment was conducted during 2007-09 at the research farm of IARI, New Delhi, India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual-purpose summer legume incorporation increased net returns over summer fallow.

Treatment
dual-purpose summer legume incorporatione3
Outcome
net returnse3
Direction
highere3
Value
29 to 34% in 2007-08 and 42 to 45% during 2008-09e3
Comparator
summer fallowe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e3

“The dual-purpose summer legume incorporation in rice-wheat system gave higher net returns by 29 to 34% in 2007-08 and 42 to 45% during 2008-09 over summer fallow with B:C ratio up to 3.01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–2004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual-purpose summer legume incorporation gave a B:C ratio up to 3.01 over summer fallow.

Treatment
dual-purpose summer legume incorporatione3
Outcome
B:C ratioe3
Direction
up toe3
Value
3.01e3
Comparator
summer fallowe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e3

“The dual-purpose summer legume incorporation in rice-wheat system gave higher net returns by 29 to 34% in 2007-08 and 42 to 45% during 2008-09 over summer fallow with B:C ratio up to 3.01”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1817–2004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.0% ZEU application gave the highest system grain yield, 12.32 and 12.71 tonnes/ha.

Treatment
2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O)e4
Outcome
system productivity in terms of grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
12.32 and 12.71 tonnes/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest N and Zn uptake, system productivity in terms of grain yield, i.e. 12.32 and 12.71 tonnes/ha was observed with application of 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–769 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.0% ZEU application gave the highest B:C ratio, 3.02.

Treatment
2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O)e5
Outcome
B:C ratioe5
Direction
higheste5
Value
3.02e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e5

“The application of 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) gave the highest B:C ratio of 3.02 and increased net returns of aromatic-hybrid rice-wheat system by 11.6 to 12.2% over prilled urea application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.0% ZEU application increased net returns of the rice-wheat system by 11.6 to 12.2% over prilled urea.

Treatment
2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O)e5
Outcome
net returnse5
Direction
increasede5
Value
11.6 to 12.2%e5
Comparator
prilled ureae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e5

“The application of 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) gave the highest B:C ratio of 3.02 and increased net returns of aromatic-hybrid rice-wheat system by 11.6 to 12.2% over prilled urea application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2006–2191 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N balance was negative in all treatments.

Outcome
N balancee6
Qualifier
in all treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e6

“The N balance was negative (-) in all treatments but it was least negative (-) in cowpea among summer treatments followed by mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea residue gave the least negative N balance among the summer treatments, followed by mungbean.

Treatment
cowpeae6
Outcome
N balancee6
Direction
least negativee6
Comparator
mungbeane6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e6

“The N balance was negative (-) in all treatments but it was least negative (-) in cowpea among summer treatments followed by mungbean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–608 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO) application gave the highest positive Zn balance, 2 696 and 2 601 g/ha.

Treatment
5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO)e7
Outcome
positive Zn balancee7
Direction
higheste7
Value
2 696 and 2 601 g/hae7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e7

“The application of 5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO) gave the highest (2 696 and 2 601 g/ha during 2007-08 and 2008-09, respectively) positive Zn balance under rice-wheat cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-enriched urea increased partial factor productivity, agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery of applied N and Zn.

Treatment
Zn-enriched ureae1
Outcome
Partial factor productivity, agronomic efficiency, apparent recoverye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Partial factor productivity, agronomic efficiency, apparent recovery and physiological efficiency of applied N and Zn in rice-wheat cropping system were increased with Zn-enriched urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-enriched urea increased physiological efficiency of applied N and Zn.

Treatment
Zn-enriched ureae1
Outcome
physiological efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Partial factor productivity, agronomic efficiency, apparent recovery and physiological efficiency of applied N and Zn in rice-wheat cropping system were increased with Zn-enriched urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1390 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2.0% ZEU increased the agronomic efficiency of N by 49.7% over prilled urea.

Treatment
2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O)e1
Outcome
agronomic efficiency of Ne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
49.7%e1
Comparator
prilled ureae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“The agronomic efficiency of N with 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) increased by 49.7% and the N recovery efficiency in grain increased up to 57.6% over normal practice of prilled urea application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2.0% ZEU increased the N recovery efficiency in grain up to 57.6% over prilled urea.

Treatment
2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O)e1
Outcome
N recovery efficiency in graine1
Direction
increased up toe1
Value
57.6%e1
Comparator
prilled ureae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“The agronomic efficiency of N with 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) increased by 49.7% and the N recovery efficiency in grain increased up to 57.6% over normal practice of prilled urea application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2.0% ZEU increased the agronomic efficiency of Zn by 54 to 160%.

Treatment
2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O)e1
Outcome
agronomic efficiency of Zne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
54 to 160%e1
Comparator
2.0% ZEU (ZnO) and 5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“With the application of 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) the agronomic efficiency of Zn increased in the range of 54 to 160% while Zn apparent recovery (%) in grain increased from 70 to 318% over 2.0% ZEU (ZnO) and 5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2.0% ZEU increased Zn apparent recovery in grain by 70 to 318%.

Treatment
2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O)e1
Outcome
Zn apparent recovery (%) in graine1
Direction
increasede1
Value
70 to 318%e1
Comparator
2.0% ZEU (ZnO) and 5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“With the application of 2.0% ZEU (ZnSO4.7H2O) the agronomic efficiency of Zn increased in the range of 54 to 160% while Zn apparent recovery (%) in grain increased from 70 to 318% over 2.0% ZEU (ZnO) and 5.0 kg Zn/ha (ZnO), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control with only N had the lowest negative N balance among the Zn treatments in 2007-08, -36.92 kg/ha.

Outcome
balance of Ne1
Value
-36.92 kg/hae1
Qualifier
control (only N)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the Zn fertilization treatments the lowest negative (-) balance of N was recorded with control (only N), i.e. -36.92 kg/ha in 2007-08”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–910 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2008-09 the coated urea treatment had the lowest negative N balance among the Zn treatments, -39.54 kg N/ha.

Outcome
balance of Ne1
Value
-39.54 kg N/hae2
Qualifier
coating material coated ureae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) – wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–175 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the Zn fertilization treatments the lowest negative (-) balance of N was recorded with control (only N), i.e. -36.92 kg/ha in 2007-08”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–910 · show in text ↑
e2

“in 2008-09 it was recorded with coating material coated urea, i.e. -39.54 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1000 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

276 papers: 254 positive, 22 negative or no effect

253 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

272 papers more in this group

See all 276 papers →

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Vigna radiata · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

53 papers: 50 positive, 3 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

zinc sulfate heptahydrate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

zinc sulfate heptahydrate · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.