Paper · 2012 · Journal of Elementology

Effects of boron fertilization of spring cereals depending on application methods

Stanisław Wróbel

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study is a comparison of effects produced by boron fertilization applied to spring barley and oats, grown on light soil, low in available boron, in relation to the application method (pre-sowing, top dressing, foliar applications) and rates of the element. The study was carried out as a three-year series of one-year, two-factor strict field trials (the splitplot design). It has been demonstrated that top dressing with boron applied to soil at the tillering stage as well as foliar fertilization during the stem elongation stage can significantly improve yields. Grain of both cereals from the control plots showed symptoms of insufficient boron nutrition, which were absent when boron fertilization had been applied. Presowing fertilization, although not affecting the yields, improved the supply of grain with boron. Differences between the cereal species were found in terms of boron concentrations in vegetative organs of the cereals and in their response to higher availability of this nutrient. Compared to spring barley, oats was characterised by a much higher content of boron in vegetative parts and was more responsive to increased concentrations of boron in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Top dressing boron at tillering significantly improved cereal yields.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
top dressing with boron applied to soil at the tillering stagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“top dressing with boron applied to soil at the tillering stage as well as foliar fertilization during the stem elongation stage can significantly improve yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley and oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar boron at stem elongation significantly improved cereal yields.

Treatment
foliar fertilization during the stem elongation stagee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar fertilization during the stem elongation stage can significantly improve yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley and oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control grain of both cereals showed insufficient boron nutrition symptoms.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Organ / stage
Graine0
Outcome
symptoms of insufficient boron nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain of both cereals from the control plots showed symptoms of insufficient boron nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley and oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron fertilization removed symptoms of insufficient boron nutrition in grain.

Treatment
boron fertilizatione0
Outcome
symptoms of insufficient boron nutritione0
Direction
absente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“symptoms of insufficient boron nutrition, which were absent when boron fertilization had been applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–723 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley and oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing boron did not affect yields.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Presowing fertilizatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
not affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presowing fertilization, although not affecting the yields, improved the supply of grain with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley and oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Presowing boron improved grain boron supply.

Treatment
Presowing fertilizatione0
Outcome
supply of grain with borone0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presowing fertilization, although not affecting the yields, improved the supply of grain with boron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley and oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats had much higher boron content in vegetative parts than spring barley.

Outcome
content of boron in vegetative partse0
Direction
much highere0
Comparator
spring barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to spring barley, oats was characterised by a much higher content of boron in vegetative parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley and oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats were more responsive to increased soil boron than spring barley.

Outcome
responsive to increased concentrations of boron in soile0
Direction
more responsivee0
Comparator
spring barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to spring barley, oats was characterised by a much higher content of boron in vegetative parts and was more responsive to increased concentrations of boron in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring barley and oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑

boron atom · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · disease · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 29 positive, 5 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.