Abstract
The productivity potential of field crops is currently realized by no more than 25%. One of the main reasons is the deterioration of the phytosanitary situation due to low agricultural technology, the cultivation of unstable varieties, non-compliance with spatial isolation norms, and others. Rust diseases take the top place in the decline in the yield of most crops, especially cereals. In a stationary field three-factor experiment of the Department of Agronomy of Yaroslavl State Agricultural Academy, the authors studied the influence of resource-saving processing systems and fertilizers on the prevalence of rust diseases and the productivity of field crops. Over the years of research (2016–2019), stem rust of oats, yellow and brown rust of wheat, linear rust of timothy were found in the crops. In 2018, warm and humid weather favored increased development of oat stem rust in annual grasses. On average, in terms of factors, the use of the studied soil cultivation systems did not cause any significant changes in the prevalence of rust diseases on cereals with minimal values on the surface-moldboard soil cultivation system. The full rate of mineral fertilizers caused a statistically significant majority of leaf rust in 2017 by 4.58%. In 2018, the use of straw contributed to a significant increase in the prevalence of oat stem rust by 18.34%. On average, for the studied soil cultivation systems in 2019, the use of the full norm of mineral fertilizers, both separately and together with straw, led to a statistically significant decrease in the above indicator with the minimum values for the background “Straw+NPK” by 6.39%. The use of a surface treatment system for all the years of research has led to a slight decrease in the productivity of field crops in comparison with surface-moldboard treatment. On average, for soil cultivation systems, the use of all types of fertilizers increased the productivity of field crops with the maximum reliable values for the background “Straw+NPK.”
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Stem rust of oats, wheat rusts, and timothy rust were observed in the crops.
- Taxon
- oats
Avena sativae0 - Outcome
- stem rust of oatse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“stem rust of oats, yellow and brown rust of wheat, linear rust of timothy were found in the crops.”
Claim · model-written summary
Warm humid weather in 2018 favored increased oat stem rust development.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Outcome
- development of oat stem ruste0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- 2018e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 2018, warm and humid weather favored increased development of oat stem rust in annual grasses.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil cultivation systems did not significantly alter cereal rust prevalence.
Verbatim
e0“the use of the studied soil cultivation systems did not cause any significant changes in the prevalence of rust diseases on cereals with minimal values on the surface-moldboard soil cultivation system.”
Claim · model-written summary
Full mineral fertilizer rate increased leaf rust by 4.58% in 2017.
- Taxon
- field cropst0
- Treatment
- full rate of mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- leaf ruste0
- Value
- 4.58%e0
- Setting
- 2017e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
e0“The full rate of mineral fertilizers caused a statistically significant majority of leaf rust in 2017 by 4.58%.”
t0“PRODUCTIVITY OF FIELD CROPS”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw significantly increased oat stem rust prevalence by 18.34% in 2018.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- strawe0
- Outcome
- prevalence of oat stem ruste0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 18.34%e0
- Setting
- 2018e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In 2018, the use of straw contributed to a significant increase in the prevalence of oat stem rust by 18.34%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Full mineral fertilizer, separately or with straw, decreased the preceding rust indicator in 2019, with a 6.39% minimum for Straw+NPK.
- Taxon
- field cropst0
- Treatment
- full norm of mineral fertilizerse0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 6.39%e0
- Qualifier
- Straw+NPKe0
Not reportedComparatorOutcome
Verbatim
e0“the use of the full norm of mineral fertilizers, both separately and together with straw, led to a statistically significant decrease in the above indicator with the minimum values for the background “Straw+NPK” by 6.39%.”
t0“PRODUCTIVITY OF FIELD CROPS”
Claim · model-written summary
Surface treatment slightly decreased field crop productivity relative to surface-moldboard treatment.
Verbatim
e0“The use of a surface treatment system for all the years of research has led to a slight decrease in the productivity of field crops in comparison with surface-moldboard treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
All fertilizer types increased crop productivity, with a maximum for Straw+NPK.
- Taxon
- field cropse0
- Treatment
- all types of fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- productivity of field cropse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- Straw+NPKe0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“the use of all types of fertilizers increased the productivity of field crops with the maximum reliable values for the background “Straw+NPK.””
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · disease · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.