Abstract
Adventitious root formation in stem cuttings of mung bean was enhanced by ethrel, which had an additive effect when employed simultaneously with indolebutyric acid (IBA). Abscisic acid (ABA) did not influence the number of roots per cutting whereas gibberellic acid (GA3) and kinetin were without effect on rooting at lower concentrations but were inhibitory at higher concentrations. Nevertheless, all three of these chemicals showed synergistic interactions with IBA and/or indol-3-ylacetic acid (IAA) and thereby significantly promoted root formation. A localised application of morphactin to the epicotyl of cuttings totally inhibited root production irrespective of which of the foregoing growth regulators were suppliedvia the hypocotyl. Morphactin application also prevented root formation in cuttings treated with vitamin D2. The various growth regulators employed had differing effects on growth of roots but there was no simple relationship between their effects on root formation and subsequent root growth.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel enhanced adventitious root formation in mung bean stem cuttings.
- Taxon
- mung bean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Organ / stage
- stem cuttingse0
- Treatment
- ethrele0
- Outcome
- Adventitious root formatione0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Adventitious root formation in stem cuttings of mung bean was enhanced by ethrel”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel had an additive rooting effect with IBA.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- ethrele0
- Compound
- indolebutyric acid (IBA)e0
- Outcome
- additive effecte0
- Direction
- additivee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“ethrel, which had an additive effect when employed simultaneously with indolebutyric acid (IBA)”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
ABA did not influence root number per cutting.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- Abscisic acid (ABA)e0
- Outcome
- number of roots per cuttinge0
- Direction
- did not influencee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Abscisic acid (ABA) did not influence the number of roots per cutting”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 inhibited rooting at higher concentrations, while lower concentrations had no effect.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- gibberellic acid (GA3)e0
- Outcome
- rootinge0
- Direction
- inhibitorye0
- Qualifier
- higher concentrationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gibberellic acid (GA3) and kinetin were without effect on rooting at lower concentrations but were inhibitory at higher concentrations”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Kinetin inhibited rooting at higher concentrations.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- kinetine0
- Outcome
- rootinge0
- Direction
- inhibitorye0
- Qualifier
- higher concentrationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gibberellic acid (GA3) and kinetin were without effect on rooting at lower concentrations but were inhibitory at higher concentrations”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
GA3 did not affect rooting at lower concentrations.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- gibberellic acid (GA3)e0
- Outcome
- rootinge0
- Direction
- without effecte0
- Qualifier
- lower concentrationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gibberellic acid (GA3) and kinetin were without effect on rooting at lower concentrations but were inhibitory at higher concentrations”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Kinetin did not affect rooting at lower concentrations.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- kinetine0
- Outcome
- rootinge0
- Direction
- without effecte0
- Qualifier
- lower concentrationse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“gibberellic acid (GA3) and kinetin were without effect on rooting at lower concentrations but were inhibitory at higher concentrations”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
ABA, GA3, and kinetin showed synergistic interactions with IBA or IAA and promoted root formation.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- all three of these chemicalse0
- Compound
- indol-3-ylacetic acid (IAA)e0
- Outcome
- root formatione0
- Direction
- promotede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all three of these chemicals showed synergistic interactions with IBA and/or indol-3-ylacetic acid (IAA) and thereby significantly promoted root formation”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Epicotyl morphactin application totally inhibited root production.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Organ / stage
- epicotyle0
- Treatment
- morphactine0
- Outcome
- root productione0
- Direction
- inhibitede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A localised application of morphactin to the epicotyl of cuttings totally inhibited root production irrespective of which of the foregoing growth regulators were suppliedvia the hypocotyl.”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Morphactin prevented rooting in vitamin D2 treated cuttings.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- Morphactin applicatione0
- Outcome
- root formatione0
- Direction
- preventede0
- Qualifier
- cuttings treated with vitamin D2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Morphactin application also prevented root formation in cuttings treated with vitamin D2.”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulators differed in their effects on subsequent root growth.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Outcome
- growth of rootse0
- Direction
- differing effectse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The various growth regulators employed had differing effects on growth of roots”
e1“mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Effects on root formation had no simple relation to later root growth.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae1
- Treatment
- effects on root formatione0
- Outcome
- subsequent root growthe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was no simple relationship between their effects on root formation and subsequent root growth”
e1“mung bean”
The same questions in other papers
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →(+)-abscisic acid · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →kinetin · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.