Paper · 1976 · Annals of Applied Biology

Benomyl tolerance in isolates of Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants

J. T. FLETCHER; SUSAN M. SCHOLEFIELD

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Three hundred and forty‐nine isolates of Botrytis cinerea were collected from tomato crops on forty‐one nurseries and 173 (40/6 %) were found to be tolerant to benomyl. There was no obvious association between disease incidence and the occurrence of tolerance. In a fungicide comparison experiment on tomatoes in 1973, twenty of the sixty‐four (31 %) isolates examined were benomyl tolerant, the majority of these were from benomyl sprayed plants. In 1974 in a similar experiment, 384 of the 394 (97‐5 %) isolates examined were tolerant. Tolerance was monitored in two tomato experiments in relation to a spray programme in which benomyl and dichlofluanid were used in various combinations. There was no marked effect of the spray programmes on the incidence of tolerance on either site. In the experiments B. cinerea was controlled and significant increases in yield were obtained with benomyl in 1973 but not in 1974. This difference is attributed to the change in the pathogen population with a large increase in the incidence of tolerance on the experimental site in 1974.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Of 349 Botrytis cinerea isolates collected from tomato crops on 41 nurseries, 173 (40/6 %) were tolerant to benomyl.

Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
tolerant to benomyle1
Value
40/6 %e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Three hundred and forty‐nine isolates of Botrytis cinerea were collected from tomato crops on forty‐one nurseries and 173 (40/6 %) were found to be tolerant to benomyl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–175 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No obvious association was found between disease incidence and the occurrence of benomyl tolerance in B. cinerea from tomato.

Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was no obvious association between disease incidence and the occurrence of tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–267 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the 1973 fungicide comparison experiment on tomatoes, 20 of 64 (31 %) B. cinerea isolates examined were benomyl tolerant.

Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
benomyl tolerante1
Value
31 %e1

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“twenty of the sixty‐four (31 %) isolates examined were benomyl tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–398 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most of the benomyl-tolerant isolates in 1973 came from benomyl-sprayed plants.

Treatment
benomyl sprayed plantse1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
the majority of thesee1
Direction
majoritye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the majority of these were from benomyl sprayed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a similar 1974 experiment, 384 of 394 (97-5 %) B. cinerea isolates examined were benomyl tolerant.

Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
tolerante1
Value
97‐5 %e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“384 of the 394 (97‐5 %) isolates examined were tolerant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl and dichlofluanid spray programmes had no marked effect on the incidence of benomyl tolerance at either site.

Treatment
spray programmese1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of tolerancee1
Direction
no marked effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“There was no marked effect of the spray programmes on the incidence of tolerance on either site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. cinerea was controlled by benomyl on tomato in the experiments.

Treatment
benomyle1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
B. cinerea was controllede1
Direction
controllede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“B. cinerea was controlled and significant increases in yield were obtained with benomyl in 1973 but not in 1974”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Benomyl gave significant yield increases in tomato in 1973 but not in 1974.

Treatment
benomyle1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Qualifier
in 1973 but not in 1974e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“B. cinerea was controlled and significant increases in yield were obtained with benomyl in 1973 but not in 1974”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–926 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute the different yield response between years to a change in the pathogen population with a large increase in benomyl tolerance in 1974.

Interactor
pathogen populatione1pathogen
Outcome
This differencee1
Qualifier
large increase in the incidence of tolerancee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“This difference is attributed to the change in the pathogen population with a large increase in the incidence of tolerance on the experimental site in 1974”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1083 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea from tomato plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–68 · show in text ↑

benomyl · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.