Paper · 1998 · Global Change Biology

Growth, light interception and yield responses of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under elevated CO2 and O3 in open‐top chambers

B. J. Mulholland; J. Craigon; C. R. Black; et al.

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
83
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Spring wheat cv. Minaret was grown to maturity under three carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and two ozone (O 3 ) concentrations in open‐top chambers (OTC). Green leaf area index (LAI) was increased by elevated CO 2 under ambient O 3 conditions as a direct result of increases in tillering, rather than individual leaf areas. Yellow LAI was also greater in the 550 and 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 treatments than in the chambered ambient control; individual leaves on the main shoot senesced more rapidly under 550 μmol mol –1 CO 2 , but senescence was delayed at 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 . Fractional light interception ( f ) during the vegetative period was up to 26% greater under 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 than in the control treatment, but seasonal accumulated intercepted radiation was only increased by 8%. As a result of greater carbon assimilation during canopy development, plants grown under elevated CO 2 were taller at anthesis and stem and ear biomass were 27 and 16% greater than in control plants. At maturity, yield was 30% greater in the 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 treatment, due to a combination of increases in the number of ears per m –2 , grain number per ear and individual grain weight (IGW). Exposure to a seasonal mean (7 h d –1 ) of 84 nmol mol –1 O 3 under ambient CO 2 decreased green LAI and increased yellow LAI, thereby reducing both f and accumulated intercepted radiation by ≈ 16%. Individual leaves senesced completely 7–28 days earlier than in control plants. At anthesis, the plants were shorter than controls and exhibited reductions in stem and ear biomass of 15 and 23%. Grain yield at maturity was decreased by 30% due to a combination of reductions in ear number m –2 , the numbers of grains per spikelet and per ear and IGW. The presence of elevated CO 2 reduced the rate of O 3 ‐induced leaf senescence and resulted in the maintenance of a higher green LAI during vegetative growth under ambient CO 2 conditions. Grain yields at maturity were nevertheless lower than those obtained in the corresponding elevated CO 2 treatments in the absence of elevated O 3 . Thus, although the presence of elevated CO 2 reduced the damaging impact of ozone on radiation interception and vegetative growth, substantial yield losses were nevertheless induced. These data suggest that spring wheat may be susceptible to O 3 ‐induced injury during anthesis irrespective of the atmospheric CO 2 concentration. Possible deleterious mechanisms operating through effects on pollen viability, seed set and the duration of grain filling are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased green LAI under ambient ozone through tillering.

Taxon
Spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
Green leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient O 3 conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Green leaf area index (LAI) was increased by elevated CO 2 under ambient O 3 conditions as a direct result of increases in tillering, rather than individual leaf areas.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–323 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yellow LAI was greater at both elevated CO2 levels than chambered ambient control.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
550 and 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 treatmentse0
Outcome
Yellow LAIe0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
chambered ambient controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow LAI was also greater in the 550 and 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 treatments than in the chambered ambient control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main shoot leaves senesced faster at 550 CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
550 μmol mol –1 CO 2e0
Outcome
individual leaves on the main shoot senescede0
Direction
more rapidlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“individual leaves on the main shoot senesced more rapidly under 550 μmol mol –1 CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Main shoot leaf senescence was delayed at 680 CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
680 μmol mol –1 CO 2e0
Outcome
senescencee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“senescence was delayed at 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative fractional light interception was up to 26% greater at 680 CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
680 μmol mol –1 CO 2e0
Outcome
Fractional light interception ( f )e0
Direction
greatere0
Value
26%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fractional light interception ( f ) during the vegetative period was up to 26% greater under 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 than in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seasonal intercepted radiation increased 8%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
seasonal accumulated intercepted radiatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seasonal accumulated intercepted radiation was only increased by 8%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased stem biomass by 27%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
stem and ear biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
27e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown under elevated CO 2 were taller at anthesis and stem and ear biomass were 27 and 16% greater than in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased ear biomass by 16%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
ear biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
16%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown under elevated CO 2 were taller at anthesis and stem and ear biomass were 27 and 16% greater than in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increased 30% at 680 CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At maturity, yield was 30% greater in the 680 μmol mol –1 CO 2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone decreased green LAI and increased yellow LAI.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
84 nmol mol –1 O 3e0
Outcome
green LAIe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“84 nmol mol –1 O 3 under ambient CO 2 decreased green LAI and increased yellow LAI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone increased yellow LAI.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
84 nmol mol –1 O 3e0
Outcome
yellow LAIe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“84 nmol mol –1 O 3 under ambient CO 2 decreased green LAI and increased yellow LAI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced light interception and accumulated radiation about 16%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
f and accumulated intercepted radiatione0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
≈ 16%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing both f and accumulated intercepted radiation by ≈ 16%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1328–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone advanced complete leaf senescence by 7–28 days.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Individual leaves senesced completelye0
Direction
earliere0
Value
7–28 dayse0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Individual leaves senesced completely 7–28 days earlier than in control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1471 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced stem biomass by 15%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
stem and ear biomasse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
15e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions in stem and ear biomass of 15 and 23%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced ear biomass by 23%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
ear biomasse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reductions in stem and ear biomass of 15 and 23%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1586 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone reduced grain yield by 30%.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
30%e0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield at maturity was decreased by 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1587–1631 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 reduced ozone induced leaf senescence and maintained higher green LAI.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
O 3 ‐induced leaf senescencee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“elevated CO 2 reduced the rate of O 3 ‐induced leaf senescence and resulted in the maintenance of a higher green LAI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1760–1876 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ozone still lowered yield under elevated CO2.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
elevated O 3e0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
corresponding elevated CO 2 treatments in the absence of elevated O 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields at maturity were nevertheless lower than those obtained in the corresponding elevated CO 2 treatments in the absence of elevated O 3 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1933–2080 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–62 · show in text ↑

ozone · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

58 papers: 14 positive, 44 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

54 papers more in this group

See all 58 papers →

ozone · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

70 papers: 7 positive, 63 negative or no effect

62 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

co2 · quality: postharvest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.