Paper · 1997 · Physiologia Plantarum

Induction of pathogen resistance and pathogenesis‐related genes in tobacco by a heat‐stable Trichoderma mycelial extract and plant signal messengers

Pi‐Fang Linda Chang; Yi Xu; Meena L. Narasimhan; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Heat‐stable mycelial extracts of the nonpathogenic fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum induced resistance in tobacco seedlings ( Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Wisconsin 38) to the pathogen Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae (race 0), which did not involve a hypersensitive response. Resistance could not be induced with mycelial extract prepared in the same manner from P. parasitica . The nonpathogenic mycelial extract induced expression of PR‐1b and osmotin (PR‐5) genes to a higher level than did mycelial extract from the pathogenic fungus. The tissue‐specific pattern of PR gene induction by the nonpathogenic mycelial extract was different from that of the pathogenic mycelial extract and was consistent with the ability of the former to cause disease resistance. The expression patterns of these two PR genes and the accumulations of their encoded proteins also were affected by salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), ethylene (E) and combinations of these plant signal messengers. However, only combined SA and MeJA treatment mimicked the pattern of PR gene mRNA and protein accumulation induced by the nonpathogenic mycelial extract. E inhibitors blocked both mycelial extract‐induced and SA/MeJA‐induced PR gene expression, and the cis pattern of responsiveness on the osmotin promoter was the same for the mycelial extract, SA, E, or E/MeJA. Seedlings treated with P. parasitica spores in the presence of SA/MeJA were protected from pathogen colonization. However, these seedlings exhibited symptoms of cell death (disease symptoms) both in the absence and presence of P. parasitica spores, in contrast to seedlings treated with nonpathogenic mycelial extract, which remained healthy. These results suggest that the signal transduction pathways for elicitation of defense responses by exogenously applied heat‐stable nonpathogenic mycelial extract and SA/MeJA overlap at the point of PR protein induction but are not identical.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma longibrachiatum extract induced tobacco seedling resistance to Phytophthora parasitica without a hypersensitive response.

Material
Wisconsin 38e0
Treatment
Heat‐stable mycelial extracts of the nonpathogenic fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatume0
Interactor
Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianaePhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma longibrachiatumTrichoderma longibrachiatume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
resistancee0
Direction
inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heat‐stable mycelial extracts of the nonpathogenic fungus Trichoderma longibrachiatum induced resistance in tobacco seedlings ( Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Wisconsin 38) to the pathogen Phytophthora parasitica var. nicotianae (race 0), which did not involve a hypersensitive response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract of Phytophthora parasitica did not induce tobacco resistance.

Treatment
mycelial extract prepared in the same manner from P. parasiticae0
Interactor
P. parasiticaPhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Outcome
Resistancee0
Direction
could not be inducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Resistance could not be induced with mycelial extract prepared in the same manner from P. parasitica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 282–382 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonpathogenic extract induced higher PR-1b and osmotin gene expression than pathogen extract.

Treatment
nonpathogenic mycelial extracte0
Gene
PR‐1b and osmotin (PR‐5)e0
Outcome
expression of PR‐1b and osmotin (PR‐5) genese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
mycelial extract from the pathogenic funguse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The nonpathogenic mycelial extract induced expression of PR‐1b and osmotin (PR‐5) genes to a higher level than did mycelial extract from the pathogenic fungus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–543 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonpathogenic extract produced a different tissue-specific PR induction pattern from pathogenic extract.

Treatment
nonpathogenic mycelial extracte0
Outcome
tissue‐specific pattern of PR gene inductione0
Direction
differente0
Comparator
pathogenic mycelial extracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The tissue‐specific pattern of PR gene induction by the nonpathogenic mycelial extract was different from that of the pathogenic mycelial extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid affected PR gene expression and protein accumulation.

Treatment
salicylic acid (SA)e0
Outcome
expression patterns of these two PR genes and the accumulations of their encoded proteinse0
Direction
affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression patterns of these two PR genes and the accumulations of their encoded proteins also were affected by salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), ethylene (E) and combinations of these plant signal messengers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl jasmonate affected PR gene expression and protein accumulation.

Treatment
methyl jasmonate (MeJA)e0
Outcome
expression patterns of these two PR genes and the accumulations of their encoded proteinse0
Direction
affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression patterns of these two PR genes and the accumulations of their encoded proteins also were affected by salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), ethylene (E) and combinations of these plant signal messengers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene affected PR gene expression and protein accumulation.

Treatment
ethylene (E)e0
Outcome
expression patterns of these two PR genes and the accumulations of their encoded proteinse0
Direction
affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The expression patterns of these two PR genes and the accumulations of their encoded proteins also were affected by salicylic acid (SA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), ethylene (E) and combinations of these plant signal messengers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–994 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only combined salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate mimicked nonpathogenic extract-induced PR mRNA and protein patterns.

Treatment
combined SA and MeJA treatmente0
Outcome
pattern of PR gene mRNA and protein accumulatione0
Direction
mimickede0
Comparator
nonpathogenic mycelial extracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only combined SA and MeJA treatment mimicked the pattern of PR gene mRNA and protein accumulation induced by the nonpathogenic mycelial extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1148 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene inhibitors blocked extract-induced PR expression.

Treatment
E inhibitorse0
Outcome
PR gene expressione0
Direction
blockede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E inhibitors blocked both mycelial extract‐induced and SA/MeJA‐induced PR gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene inhibitors blocked SA/MeJA-induced PR expression.

Treatment
E inhibitorse0
Outcome
SA/MeJA‐induced PR gene expressione0
Direction
blockede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“E inhibitors blocked both mycelial extract‐induced and SA/MeJA‐induced PR gene expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1239 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotin promoter responsiveness was the same for extract, SA, ethylene, and ethylene/MeJA.

Gene
osmotin promotere0
Outcome
cis pattern of responsivenesse0
Direction
the samee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cis pattern of responsiveness on the osmotin promoter was the same for the mycelial extract, SA, E, or E/MeJA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1358 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA/MeJA protected tobacco seedlings challenged with Phytophthora spores from pathogen colonization.

Treatment
SA/MeJAe0
Interactor
P. parasiticaPhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Outcome
pathogen colonizatione0
Direction
protectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings treated with P. parasitica spores in the presence of SA/MeJA were protected from pathogen colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1472 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SA/MeJA-treated seedlings showed cell-death symptoms with or without Phytophthora spores, unlike healthy extract-treated seedlings.

Treatment
SA/MeJAe1
Interactor
P. parasiticaPhytophthora nicotianaee0pathogen
Outcome
symptoms of cell deathe0
Direction
exhibitede0
Comparator
seedlings treated with nonpathogenic mycelial extracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora nicotianae
Phytophthora nicotianae · InteractorSupattra Intavimolsri Department of Agriculture, Thailand · CC BY 3.0 au · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these seedlings exhibited symptoms of cell death (disease symptoms) both in the absence and presence of P. parasitica spores, in contrast to seedlings treated with nonpathogenic mycelial extract, which remained healthy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1701 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seedlings treated with P. parasitica spores in the presence of SA/MeJA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1430 · show in text ↑
e2

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that extract and SA/MeJA defense pathways overlap at PR induction but are not identical.

Outcome
defense responsese0
Qualifier
overlap at the point of PR protein induction but are not identicale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“signal transduction pathways for elicitation of defense responses by exogenously applied heat‐stable nonpathogenic mycelial extract and SA/MeJA overlap at the point of PR protein induction but are not identical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1944 · show in text ↑
e1

“tobacco seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–125 · show in text ↑

Phytophthora nicotianae · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

botanical · Phytophthora nicotianae · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · disease · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

botanical · molecular: expression · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.