Paper · 2010 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Conjoint application of bio-organic and inorganic nutrient sources for improving cropping behaviour, soil properties and quality attributes of apricot (Prunus armeniaca).

Vishram Singh; Som Dev Sharma; Pramod Kumar; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
17
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The study was carried out during 2006-08 on 20-year-old 'New Castle' apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) trees to investigate the conjoint efficacy of bio-organics used along with chemical fertilizers on cropping behaviour, soil properties and quality attributes. Conjoint application of biofertilizers 60 g/tree, vermicompost 30 kg/tree, cow urine 12.5% and 50% NPK resulted in significantly maximum bloom density (25.08%), fruit set (62.38%), yield (29.85 kg/tree), fruit firmness (7.06 kg/cm 2 ), total soluble solids (17.04 °Brix), reducing sugars (3.97%), ascorbic acid (7.29 mg/100 g) and total carotenoids (0.96 mg/100 g). This combination also significantly improved physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil rhizosphere. Available N, P and K content of rhizosphere soil was increased by 34.8, 88.3 and 16.6%, respectively. Micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn) were improved by 15.1, 25.3, 28.7 and 24.1% respectively. The microbial biomass pool in terms of Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Azotobacter chroococcum and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased by 208.25, 113.40, 383.50 and 442.50% respectively over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment produced maximum bloom density of 25.08%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Conjoint application of biofertilizers 60 g/tree, vermicompost 30 kg/tree, cow urine 12.5% and 50% NPKe0
Outcome
bloom densitye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
25.08%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conjoint application of biofertilizers 60 g/tree, vermicompost 30 kg/tree, cow urine 12.5% and 50% NPK resulted in significantly maximum bloom density (25.08%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–417 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment produced maximum fruit set of 62.38%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Conjoint application of biofertilizers 60 g/tree, vermicompost 30 kg/tree, cow urine 12.5% and 50% NPKe0
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
maximume0
Value
62.38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conjoint application of biofertilizers 60 g/tree, vermicompost 30 kg/tree, cow urine 12.5% and 50% NPK resulted in significantly maximum bloom density (25.08%), fruit set (62.38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment produced maximum yield of 29.85 kg/tree.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
yielde0
Value
29.85 kg/treee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield (29.85 kg/tree)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–460 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment produced fruit firmness of 7.06 kg/cm 2.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Value
7.06 kg/cm 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit firmness (7.06 kg/cm 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment produced total soluble solids of 17.04 °Brix.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
total soluble solidse0
Value
17.04 °Brixe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total soluble solids (17.04 °Brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–528 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment produced reducing sugars of 3.97%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
reducing sugarse0
Value
3.97%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing sugars (3.97%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–553 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment produced ascorbic acid of 7.29 mg/100 g.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Value
7.29 mg/100 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ascorbic acid (7.29 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nutrient treatment produced total carotenoids of 0.96 mg/100 g.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
total carotenoidse0
Value
0.96 mg/100 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total carotenoids (0.96 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The nutrient combination improved physical, chemical and biological rhizosphere soil properties.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil rhizospheree0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This combination also significantly improved physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil rhizosphere”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–737 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere available N increased 34.8%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
Available Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
34.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Available N, P and K content of rhizosphere soil was increased by 34.8, 88.3 and 16.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere available P increased 88.3%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
Pe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
88.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Available N, P and K content of rhizosphere soil was increased by 34.8, 88.3 and 16.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere available K increased 16.6%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
K content of rhizosphere soile0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Available N, P and K content of rhizosphere soil was increased by 34.8, 88.3 and 16.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere Fe improved 15.1%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
Fee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
15.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn) were improved by 15.1, 25.3, 28.7 and 24.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere Cu improved 25.3%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
Cue0
Direction
improvede0
Value
25.3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn) were improved by 15.1, 25.3, 28.7 and 24.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere Zn improved 28.7%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
Zne0
Direction
improvede0
Value
28.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn) were improved by 15.1, 25.3, 28.7 and 24.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere Mn improved 24.1%.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
Mne0
Direction
improvede0
Value
24.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrients (Fe, Cu, Zn, Mn) were improved by 15.1, 25.3, 28.7 and 24.1% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–929 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere Pseudomonas biomass increased 208.25% over control.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
PseudomonasPseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
Pseudomonase0
Direction
increasede0
Value
208.25e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microbial biomass pool in terms of Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Azotobacter chroococcum and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased by 208.25, 113.40, 383.50 and 442.50% respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere Bacillus biomass increased 113.40% over control.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
Bacilluse0symbiont
Outcome
Bacilluse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
113.40e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microbial biomass pool in terms of Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Azotobacter chroococcum and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased by 208.25, 113.40, 383.50 and 442.50% respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere Azotobacter chroococcum biomass increased 383.50% over control.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
Outcome
Azotobacter chroococcume0
Direction
increasede0
Value
383.50e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microbial biomass pool in terms of Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Azotobacter chroococcum and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased by 208.25, 113.40, 383.50 and 442.50% respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi biomass increased 442.50% over control.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Interactor
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungie0
Direction
increasede0
Value
442.50%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The microbial biomass pool in terms of Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Azotobacter chroococcum and Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increased by 208.25, 113.40, 383.50 and 442.50% respectively over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–150 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.