Abstract
The influence of soil application of some biofertilizers (Nitrobein (Ni), Enciabein (En), Phosphorene (Ph)) and Rock Phosphate (RP) on some vegetative growth, fruiting parameters, fruit properties and leaf mineral contents were studied on "Canino" apricot trees budded on local apricot rootstock grown in sandy soils during the two successive seasons of 2002 and 2003. The obtained results indicated that all biofertilizers treatments under study resulted in a positive effect and significant increase in all vegetative growth measurements, i.e. shoot length, number of leaves per shoot, leaf area, leaf chlorophyll content, shoot thickness and shoot diameter increment %. Moreover, all investigated treatments significantly increased both tree yield (either kg or No. of fruits per tree) and yield increment % compared to the control (OMF). Additionally, data revealed that fruit physical properties such as fruit weight, volume, firmness, No. of fruits per kg, dimensions and fruit shape index as well as fruit chemical properties as TSS %, total acidity % and TSS/acid ratio were improved by different treatments in most cases as compared to the control. Furthermore, leaf nutrient (N, P and K) contents were significantly improved by studied treatments in both seasons of study. Generally, it could be concluded that all investigated treatments under study resulted in a positive and significant effect, since both (OMF + Ni + En + Ph) and (OMF+Ni +En) were the best and the most effective treatments for increasing and improving all studied vegetative and fruiting characteristics of "Canino" apricot trees.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers significantly increased shoot length, leaves per shoot and leaf area.
- Taxon
- APRICOT
Prunus armeniacat0 - Treatment
- biofertilizers treatmentse0
- Outcome
- shoot length, number of leaves per shoot, leaf areae0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- control (OMF)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all biofertilizers treatments under study resulted in a positive effect and significant increase in all vegetative growth measurements, i.e. shoot length, number of leaves per shoot, leaf area, leaf chlorophyll content, shoot thickness and shoot diameter increment %.”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
e2“all investigated treatments significantly increased both tree yield (either kg or No. of fruits per tree) and yield increment % compared to the control (OMF).”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers significantly increased leaf chlorophyll content.
- Taxon
- APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- biofertilizers treatmentse0
- Outcome
- leaf chlorophyll contente0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- control (OMF)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all biofertilizers treatments under study resulted in a positive effect and significant increase in all vegetative growth measurements, i.e. shoot length, number of leaves per shoot, leaf area, leaf chlorophyll content, shoot thickness and shoot diameter increment %.”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
e2“all investigated treatments significantly increased both tree yield (either kg or No. of fruits per tree) and yield increment % compared to the control (OMF).”
Claim · model-written summary
Biofertilizers significantly increased shoot thickness and diameter increment.
- Taxon
- APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- biofertilizers treatmentse0
- Outcome
- shoot thickness and shoot diameter increment %e0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- control (OMF)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all biofertilizers treatments under study resulted in a positive effect and significant increase in all vegetative growth measurements, i.e. shoot length, number of leaves per shoot, leaf area, leaf chlorophyll content, shoot thickness and shoot diameter increment %.”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
e2“all investigated treatments significantly increased both tree yield (either kg or No. of fruits per tree) and yield increment % compared to the control (OMF).”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments significantly increased tree yield in kg and fruit counts.
- Taxon
- APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- all investigated treatmentse0
- Outcome
- tree yield (either kg or No. of fruits per tree)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control (OMF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all investigated treatments significantly increased both tree yield (either kg or No. of fruits per tree) and yield increment % compared to the control (OMF).”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments significantly increased yield increment percentage.
- Taxon
- APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- all investigated treatmentse0
- Outcome
- yield increment %e0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- control (OMF)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“all investigated treatments significantly increased both tree yield (either kg or No. of fruits per tree) and yield increment % compared to the control (OMF).”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments improved fruit weight, volume and firmness in most cases.
- Taxon
- APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse0
- Outcome
- fruit weight, volume, firmnesse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- in most casese0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit physical properties such as fruit weight, volume, firmness, No. of fruits per kg, dimensions and fruit shape index as well as fruit chemical properties as TSS %, total acidity % and TSS/acid ratio were improved by different treatments in most cases as compared to the control.”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments improved fruit count per kg, dimensions and shape index in most cases.
- Taxon
- APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse0
- Outcome
- No. of fruits per kg, dimensions and fruit shape indexe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- in most casese0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit physical properties such as fruit weight, volume, firmness, No. of fruits per kg, dimensions and fruit shape index as well as fruit chemical properties as TSS %, total acidity % and TSS/acid ratio were improved by different treatments in most cases as compared to the control.”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments improved TSS, total acidity and TSS/acid ratio in most cases.
- Taxon
- APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- different treatmentse0
- Outcome
- TSS %, total acidity % and TSS/acid ratioe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- in most casese0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruit physical properties such as fruit weight, volume, firmness, No. of fruits per kg, dimensions and fruit shape index as well as fruit chemical properties as TSS %, total acidity % and TSS/acid ratio were improved by different treatments in most cases as compared to the control.”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatments significantly improved leaf N, P and K contents in both seasons.
- Taxon
- APRICOTPrunus armeniacat0
- Treatment
- studied treatmentse0
- Outcome
- leaf nutrient (N, P and K) contentse0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- both seasons of studye0
- Comparator
- control (OMF)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“leaf nutrient (N, P and K) contents were significantly improved by studied treatments in both seasons of study.”
t0““CANINO” APRICOT TREES”
e2“all investigated treatments significantly increased both tree yield (either kg or No. of fruits per tree) and yield increment % compared to the control (OMF).”
Claim · model-written summary
OMF + Ni + En + Ph was among the most effective treatments for vegetative and fruiting traits.
- Taxon
- apricotPrunus armeniacae0
- Treatment
- OMF + Ni + En + Phe0
- Outcome
- vegetative and fruiting characteristicse0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both (OMF + Ni + En + Ph) and (OMF+Ni +En) were the best and the most effective treatments for increasing and improving all studied vegetative and fruiting characteristics of "Canino" apricot trees.”
Claim · model-written summary
OMF+Ni +En was among the most effective treatments for vegetative and fruiting traits.
- Taxon
- apricotPrunus armeniacae0
- Treatment
- OMF+Ni +Ene0
- Outcome
- vegetative and fruiting characteristicse0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“both (OMF + Ni + En + Ph) and (OMF+Ni +En) were the best and the most effective treatments for increasing and improving all studied vegetative and fruiting characteristics of "Canino" apricot trees.”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · physiology: pigments · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- negative
inoculation · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · growth · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.