Paper · 1998 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilization on the growth, yield and pitburn of apricot (cv. Bergeron)

C. Bussi; M. A. L. Smith

14
claims
30
verbatim quotes
20
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryNitrogen (N) and potassium (K) fertilization were studied in apricot trees. Increasing N enhanced vegetative growth, yield and average fruit weight, but reduced fruit colouring. More effect was seen by increasing N from 0 to 25 kg ha-1 than by increasing from 25 to 150 kg ha-1. K fertilization did not affect vegetative growth or yield but tended to stimulate fruit colouring and enhance soluble solids concentration of fruits. N and K interacted to affect vegetative growth and pitburn. Pitburn increased significantly as N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1. Concurrently, fruit N content increased and Ca content decreased suggesting that these nutrient concentrations are related to pitburn incidence. Of the levels of N studied, 25 kg ha-1 was the most commercially suitable, since yields were only slightly less than at 150 kg ha-1 but pitburn was significantly lower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N enhanced vegetative growth, yield and average fruit weight in apricot trees.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Increasing Ne1
Outcome
vegetative growth, yield and average fruit weighte1
Direction
enhancede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N enhanced vegetative growth, yield and average fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–154 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing N reduced fruit colouring in apricot.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
Increasing Ne1
Outcome
fruit colouringe1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Increasing N enhanced vegetative growth, yield and average fruit weight, but reduced fruit colouring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 83–183 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In apricot, increasing N from 0 to 25 kg ha-1 had a larger effect than increasing it from 25 to 150 kg ha-1.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
increasing N from 0 to 25 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
More effecte1
Direction
More effecte1
Comparator
increasing from 25 to 150 kg ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“More effect was seen by increasing N from 0 to 25 kg ha-1 than by increasing from 25 to 150 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–284 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilization did not affect vegetative growth or yield of apricot.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
K fertilizatione1
Outcome
vegetative growth or yielde1
Direction
did not affecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“K fertilization did not affect vegetative growth or yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–343 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilization tended to stimulate fruit colouring in apricot.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
K fertilizatione1
Outcome
fruit colouringe1
Direction
tended to stimulatee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“K fertilization did not affect vegetative growth or yield but tended to stimulate fruit colouring and enhance soluble solids concentration of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilization enhanced soluble solids concentration of apricot fruits.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
K fertilizatione1
Outcome
soluble solids concentration of fruitse1
Direction
enhancee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“K fertilization did not affect vegetative growth or yield but tended to stimulate fruit colouring and enhance soluble solids concentration of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–434 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N and K interacted to affect vegetative growth and pitburn in apricot.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
N and Ke1
Outcome
vegetative growth and pitburne1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“N and K interacted to affect vegetative growth and pitburn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–494 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pitburn in apricot increased significantly as N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
Pitburne1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pitburn increased significantly as N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–569 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit N content of apricot increased as N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
fruit N contente2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pitburn increased significantly as N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–569 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit N content increased and Ca content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit Ca content of apricot decreased as N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
Ca contente2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Pitburn increased significantly as N was increased from 25 to 150 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–569 · show in text ↑
e2

“fruit N content increased and Ca content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–635 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that fruit nutrient concentrations (N and Ca) are related to pitburn incidence in apricot.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Compound
nutrient concentrationse1
Outcome
pitburn incidencee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“suggesting that these nutrient concentrations are related to pitburn incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Of the N levels studied, 25 kg ha-1 was the most commercially suitable for apricot.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Outcome
25 kg ha-1 was the most commercially suitablee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Of the levels of N studied, 25 kg ha-1 was the most commercially suitable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–789 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25 kg ha-1 N, apricot yields were only slightly less than at 150 kg ha-1.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
25 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
slightly lesse1
Comparator
150 kg ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“25 kg ha-1 was the most commercially suitable, since yields were only slightly less than at 150 kg ha-1 but pitburn was significantly lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 25 kg ha-1 N, apricot pitburn was significantly lower than at 150 kg ha-1.

Taxon
apricotPrunus armeniacat0
Treatment
25 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
pitburne1
Direction
significantly lowere1
Comparator
150 kg ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“25 kg ha-1 was the most commercially suitable, since yields were only slightly less than at 150 kg ha-1 but pitburn was significantly lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“apricot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–91 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.