Paper · 1936 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

MODIFICATION OF QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF GRAPE AND PEACH BY CHANGING THE ORDER OF GIVING TIME OF N, P, and K.

Yasusi OINOUE

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The author of this paper recongnised the modification of both quantity and quality of grape and peach by changing the order of givingtime of nutrients N, P, K. Liebig's law is adaptable only within a limit, and out of the limit it is not usable when the order of giving time ofthe same nutrients and of the same quantity is changed. A ratio of nutrients therefore is sometimes favourable and sometimes harmful, it gives good result only when it fitted itself to the nutrioper iodism that the authorhas found lately. The vegetative organ demands much N, the generative organ requires much P and for the maturation only K is favourable. N given at the time of maturation causes the reaction of the development and the yield of fruits is smaller and their quality is poorer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing the order of N, P, and K application modified grape and peach quantity and quality.

Taxon
grape and peache0
Treatment
changing the order of givingtime of nutrients N, P, Ke0
Outcome
quantity and qualitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“modification of both quantity and quality of grape and peach by changing the order of givingtime of nutrients N, P, K.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–159 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vegetative organ demands much N.

Taxon
GRAPE AND PEACHt0
Organ / stage
vegetative organe0
Outcome
demands much Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“The vegetative organ demands much N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE AND PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The generative organ requires much P.

Taxon
GRAPE AND PEACHt0
Organ / stage
generative organe0
Outcome
requires much Pe0

Verbatim

e0

“the generative organ requires much P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE AND PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For maturation, only K was considered favorable.

Taxon
GRAPE AND PEACHt0
Organ / stage
maturatione0
Outcome
only K is favourablee0

Verbatim

e0

“for the maturation only K is favourable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE AND PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N applied at maturation caused a developmental reaction.

Taxon
GRAPE AND PEACHt0
Treatment
N given at the time of maturatione0
Outcome
reaction of the developmente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“N given at the time of maturation causes the reaction of the development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE AND PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N applied at maturation reduced fruit yield.

Taxon
GRAPE AND PEACHt0
Treatment
N given at the time of maturatione0
Outcome
yield of fruitse0
Direction
smallere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N given at the time of maturation causes the reaction of the development and the yield of fruits is smaller”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE AND PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N applied at maturation worsened fruit quality.

Taxon
GRAPE AND PEACHt0
Treatment
N given at the time of maturatione0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
poorere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N given at the time of maturation causes the reaction of the development and the yield of fruits is smaller and their quality is poorer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–770 · show in text ↑
t0

“GRAPE AND PEACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–55 · show in text ↑

stage · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

stage · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

stage · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

stage · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

stage · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

stage · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.