Paper · 2012 · Northern Horticulture

Effects of Plant Growth Regulators Influenced on Centennial Seedless Fruit Quality

Ren Xiang-rong

3
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of centennial seedless fruit after dipping into different concentrations of plant growth regulators(GA3,CPPU,6-BA) on the plant growth regulators in different stages were studied,in order to improve the seedless grape fruit quality and enhance its commodity value.The results showed that centennial seedless fruit cherry weight,cluster weight and quality were improved better under the treatment of the grape dipping into 5 mg/L of GA3 5 days before the flowering stage and 1 mg/L of CPPU plus 20 mg/L of GA3 5 days after flowering.Under the treatment of plant growth regulators,the grape yield and its quality were improved obviously,and the commodity value was improved as well.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified pre- and postflowering dips improved fruit berry weight, cluster weight and quality.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
dipping into 5 mg/L of GA3 5 days before the flowering stage and 1 mg/L of CPPU plus 20 mg/L of GA3 5 days after floweringe0
Outcome
fruit cherry weight,cluster weight and qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“centennial seedless fruit cherry weight,cluster weight and quality were improved better under the treatment of the grape dipping into 5 mg/L of GA3 5 days before the flowering stage and 1 mg/L of CPPU plus 20 mg/L of GA3 5 days after flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators improved grape yield and quality.

Taxon
grapee0
Treatment
plant growth regulatorse0
Outcome
grape yield and its qualitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under the treatment of plant growth regulators,the grape yield and its quality were improved obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant growth regulators improved grape commodity value.

Taxon
grapee1
Treatment
plant growth regulatorse1
Outcome
commodity valuee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the commodity value was improved as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–692 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the treatment of plant growth regulators,the grape yield and its quality were improved obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–646 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · quality: general · VitisResults differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

forchlorfenuron · quality: general · VitisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

stage · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

class · quality: general · VitisResults agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.