Paper · 2024 · Horticultural Plant Journal

An efficient irrigation method for facility-cultivated grape trees at various stages of development

Xiaolong Wang; Chang Liu; Xiaohao Ji; et al.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Achieving global fruit demand can be realized through the application of agricultural technologies. However, it is crucial to first overcome the enormous agricultural challenges posed by the implementation of efficient irrigation technologies. To address the issues related to inadequate water supply and inefficient traditional fruit tree irrigation methods, we propose a cost-effective and efficient approach—the “439” field precision irrigation scheme. This scheme predicts four relative soil water content minimum thresholds (RSWCT s ) and maximum (RSWCT e ) thresholds [relative to the percentage of field capacity (FC)] for starting and ending irrigation. By exploring the relationship between RSWCT s , RSWCT e and fruit quality, we assessed the scheme's effectiveness. A practical case study was conducted on grape ( Vitis vinifera L., ‘87-1’) cultivated in a facility from 2019 to 2022 to evaluate the scheme's impact on irrigation management. The results indicate that maintaining 70%–80% FC from germination stage (GS) to end bloom stage (EBS), 70%–80% FC from EBS to veraison stage (VS), 55%–70% FC from VS to maturation stage (MS), and 55%–65% FC from MS to deciduous stage (DS) improve single grain weight (SGW). Similarly, to improve total soluble solid content, 60%–80% FC is suggested from GS to EBS, 70%–80% FC from EBS to VS, 60%–70% FC from VS to MS, and 60%–70% FC from MS to DS. To improve peel strength and fruit quality index (FQI), 70%–80% FC is recommended from GS to EBS, 60%–70% FC from EBS to VS, 55%–65% FC from VS to MS, and 55%–70% FC from MS to DS. This management tool helps farmers optimize irrigation efficiency and increase profits by growing high-quality fruit. In summary, the implementation of the “439” field precision irrigation system, coupled with fruit quality analysis, holds promise for enhancing water efficiency in precision agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stage-specific 70%–80% to 55%–70% FC irrigation schedule improves single grain weight of grapes.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
maintaining 70%–80% FC from germination stage (GS) to end bloom stage (EBS), 70%–80% FC from EBS to veraison stage (VS), 55%–70% FC from VS to maturation stage (MS), and 55%–65% FC from MS to deciduous stage (DS)e1
Outcome
single grain weight (SGW)e1
Direction
improvee1
Setting
facility-cultivatedt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“facility-cultivated grape trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results indicate that maintaining 70%–80% FC from germination stage (GS) to end bloom stage (EBS), 70%–80% FC from EBS to veraison stage (VS), 55%–70% FC from VS to maturation stage (MS), and 55%–65% FC from MS to deciduous stage (DS) improve single grain weight (SGW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1225 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stage-specific 60%–80% to 60%–70% FC irrigation schedule improves total soluble solid content of grapes.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
60%–80% FC is suggested from GS to EBS, 70%–80% FC from EBS to VS, 60%–70% FC from VS to MS, and 60%–70% FC from MS to DSe2
Outcome
total soluble solid contente2
Direction
improvee2
Setting
facility-cultivatedt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“facility-cultivated grape trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
e2

“to improve total soluble solid content, 60%–80% FC is suggested from GS to EBS, 70%–80% FC from EBS to VS, 60%–70% FC from VS to MS, and 60%–70% FC from MS to DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stage-specific 70%–80% to 55%–70% FC irrigation schedule improves peel strength and fruit quality index of grapes.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
70%–80% FC is recommended from GS to EBS, 60%–70% FC from EBS to VS, 55%–65% FC from VS to MS, and 55%–70% FC from MS to DSe3
Outcome
peel strength and fruit quality index (FQI)e3
Direction
improvee3
Setting
facility-cultivatedt0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“facility-cultivated grape trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
e3

“To improve peel strength and fruit quality index (FQI), 70%–80% FC is recommended from GS to EBS, 60%–70% FC from EBS to VS, 55%–65% FC from VS to MS, and 55%–70% FC from MS to DS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1580 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: grain · VitisPositive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

stage · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 7 positive, 5 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

stage · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

processing · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

stage · quality: grain · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.