Paper · 2002 · African Crop Science Journal

Sugarbeet leaf growth and yield response to soil water deficit

Y. A Abayomi; D Wright

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

(Received 18 October, 1999; accepted 27 November, 2001) Abstract There are conflicting reports about the sensitivity of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) to water stress during different growth stages. Although, it is generally believed that the crop benefits from irrigation, opinions still differ as to which growth stage irrigation should be applied. This study evaluated the responses of sugarbeet leaf growth, sugar yield and yield components to soil water deficit imposed at various periods during growth in a glasshouse. Leaf growth showed high sensitivity to soil water deficit and responses varied with periods at which the deficit occurred. Water deficit early in the growing season had larger effects on leaf growth, leaf extension rate (LER), area of individual leaf, and leaf area index (LAI). Mid- or late-season soil water deficit showed relatively smaller effects on leaf growth. Re-watering resulted in compensatory leaf growth in early stressed plants. Both early (ES) and late (LS) soil water deficit decreased sugar yield and sugar concentrations. However, there were no significant (P

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarbeet leaf growth was highly sensitive to soil water deficit, with response varying by deficit period.

Treatment
soil water deficite0
Outcome
Leaf growthe0
Direction
high sensitivitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf growth showed high sensitivity to soil water deficit and responses varied with periods at which the deficit occurred.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–645 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early-season water deficit had larger effects on sugarbeet leaf growth, leaf extension rate, individual leaf area and leaf area index.

Treatment
Water deficit early in the growing seasone0
Outcome
leaf growth, leaf extension rate (LER), area of individual leaf, and leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water deficit early in the growing season had larger effects on leaf growth, leaf extension rate (LER), area of individual leaf, and leaf area index (LAI).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mid- or late-season water deficit had relatively smaller effects on sugarbeet leaf growth.

Treatment
Mid- or late-season soil water deficite0
Outcome
leaf growthe0
Direction
smallere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mid- or late-season soil water deficit showed relatively smaller effects on leaf growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rewatering produced compensatory leaf growth in early-stressed sugarbeet plants.

Treatment
Re-wateringe0
Outcome
compensatory leaf growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Re-watering resulted in compensatory leaf growth in early stressed plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–965 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early soil water deficit decreased sugarbeet sugar yield.

Treatment
early (ES)e0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both early (ES) and late (LS) soil water deficit decreased sugar yield and sugar concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late soil water deficit decreased sugarbeet sugar yield.

Treatment
late (LS) soil water deficite0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both early (ES) and late (LS) soil water deficit decreased sugar yield and sugar concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early soil water deficit decreased sugarbeet sugar concentration.

Treatment
early (ES)e0
Outcome
sugar concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both early (ES) and late (LS) soil water deficit decreased sugar yield and sugar concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late soil water deficit decreased sugarbeet sugar concentration.

Treatment
late (LS) soil water deficite0
Outcome
sugar concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both early (ES) and late (LS) soil water deficit decreased sugar yield and sugar concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sugarbeet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–9 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

37 papers: 8 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

climate site · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 6 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

rewatering · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.