Paper · 2019 · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research

Foliage applications of jasmonic acid modulate the antioxidant defense under water deficit growth in sugar beet

Hamideh Ghaffari; Mahmoud R. Tadayon; Muhammad Nadeem; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Aims of study: Water deficit (WD) is becoming an alarming problem in many regions of the world. Jasmonic acid (JA) is considered an important intracellular plant growth regulator. The aim of the current research was to investigate the important role of JA in mitigating the negative effects of WD on plant growth.Area of study: Sugar beet production systems of two locations in Chaharmahal-Bakhtiari province, Iran.Material and methods: A field trial was conducted to assess the foliar applications of JA (0, 5 µM and 10 µM) and WD (50%, 75%, 100% plant water requirements) effects on physiological yield components of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants.Main results: WD significantly (p<0.05) increased catalase, ascorbate and peroxidase activities, and malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide and white sugar content (WSC); however, it caused a reduction in white sugar yield and root yield (RY). JA foliage applications further enhanced the enzymes activity in WD treated plants resulting in higher WSC, potassium concentrations, white sugar and final RY. Interestingly the effects of JA applications were more pronounced under severe WD (50%) compared to mild (75%) or well-watered plants (100%). JA (10 µM) foliage applications increased the RY and white sugar production by 21% and 24% under severe WD.Research highlights: JA can ameliorate the adverse effects of WD and increase the WD tolerance of sugar beet crop by upregulating the antioxidant enzyme activities to withstand adverse environmental conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly increased catalase, ascorbate and peroxidase activities.

Treatment
WDe0
Outcome
catalase, ascorbate and peroxidase activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WD significantly (p<0.05) increased catalase, ascorbate and peroxidase activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly increased malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide.

Treatment
WDe0
Outcome
malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxidee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WD significantly (p<0.05) increased catalase, ascorbate and peroxidase activities, and malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide and white sugar content (WSC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit significantly increased white sugar content.

Treatment
WDe0
Outcome
white sugar content (WSC)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WD significantly (p<0.05) increased catalase, ascorbate and peroxidase activities, and malondialdehyde, hydrogen peroxide and white sugar content (WSC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced white sugar yield and root yield.

Treatment
WDt1
Outcome
white sugar yield and root yield (RY)e0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it caused a reduction in white sugar yield and root yield (RY)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–894 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
t1

“WD significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar jasmonic acid further enhanced antioxidant enzyme activity in water deficit treated plants.

Treatment
JA foliage applicationse0
Outcome
enzymes activitye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
WD treated plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JA foliage applications further enhanced the enzymes activity in WD treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar jasmonic acid increased white sugar content and potassium concentrations under water deficit.

Treatment
JA foliage applicationse0
Outcome
WSC, potassium concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
WD treated plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JA foliage applications further enhanced the enzymes activity in WD treated plants resulting in higher WSC, potassium concentrations, white sugar and final RY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar jasmonic acid increased white sugar yield and final root yield under water deficit.

Treatment
JA foliage applicationse0
Outcome
white sugar and final RYe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
WD treated plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JA foliage applications further enhanced the enzymes activity in WD treated plants resulting in higher WSC, potassium concentrations, white sugar and final RY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jasmonic acid effects were stronger under severe water deficit than under mild water deficit or full watering.

Treatment
JA applicationse0
Outcome
effects of JA applicationse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
severe WD (50%)e0
Comparator
mild (75%) or well-watered plants (100%)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of JA applications were more pronounced under severe WD (50%) compared to mild (75%) or well-watered plants (100%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe water deficit, 10 µM foliar jasmonic acid increased root yield by 21%.

Treatment
JA (10 µM) foliage applicationse0
Outcome
RYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
21%e0
Qualifier
severe WDe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JA (10 µM) foliage applications increased the RY and white sugar production by 21% and 24% under severe WD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under severe water deficit, 10 µM foliar jasmonic acid increased white sugar production by 24%.

Treatment
JA (10 µM) foliage applicationse0
Outcome
white sugar productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
24%e0
Qualifier
severe WDe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JA (10 µM) foliage applications increased the RY and white sugar production by 21% and 24% under severe WD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–111 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors conclude that jasmonic acid improves water deficit tolerance by upregulating antioxidant enzymes.

Treatment
JAe0
Outcome
WD tolerancee0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
upregulating the antioxidant enzyme activitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“JA can ameliorate the adverse effects of WD and increase the WD tolerance of sugar beet crop by upregulating the antioxidant enzyme activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1468 · show in text ↑

jasmonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 6 positive, 14 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

drought · physiology: oxidative · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.