Paper · 2016 · Crop and Pasture Science

Comparative responses to water deficit stress and subsequent recovery in the cultivated beet Beta vulgaris and its wild relative B. macrocarpa

Inès Slama; Asma Jdey; Aida Rouached; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of water deficit stress and recovery on growth, photosynthesis, physiological and biochemical parameters were investigated in the cultivated Beta vulgaris and in two Tunisian provenances (Soliman and Enfidha) of its wild relative B. macrocarpa. Seedlings were cultivated for 4 weeks under optimal or limiting water supply (respectively, 100% and 25% of field capacity, FC). After 2 weeks of treatment, a lot of stressed plants were rehydrated to 100% FC. In the Control, B. vulgaris was more productive than B. macrocarpa, whereas Enfidha provenance showed the highest biomass production (1.6- and 3-fold compared with B. vulgaris and Soliman, respectively), under water deficit stress. A partial re-establishment of growth occurred in both species upon recovery at 100% FC. The sensitivity of B. vulgaris and Soliman provenance to drought was associated with the disturbance of leaf water status and the sharp decrease in net CO2 assimilation (–66% and –82% as compared with the Control, respectively). On the contrary, the better behaviour of Enfidha provenance was related to its better photosynthetic capacity and leaf relative water content, along with a higher accumulation of amino acids (proline, glycine, and glutamine) implied in the osmotic adjustment. Leaf hexose concentration increased significantly under drought stress in both species whereas leaf sucrose concentration declined only in drought-stressed B. vulgaris and Soliman provenance. Leaf glutamate dehydrogenase activity increased under water deficit in both species despite to a higher extent in B. vulgaris. As glutamate dehydrogenase is implied in catabolism of glutamate to oxoglutarate, it might contribute to provide stressed plants with carbon skeletons. Enfidha provenance of the spontaneous species B. macrocarpa could be used in the marginal arid ecosystems in order to limit the deficit in fodder and to improve the pastoral value of these regions. In addition, this species could serve as a source of genes for genetic improvement to water deficit stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control B. vulgaris was more productive than B. macrocarpa.

Taxon
B. vulgarisBeta vulgarise0
Outcome
productivee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
B. macrocarpae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the Control, B. vulgaris was more productive than B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 467–533 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficit, Enfidha had 1.6-fold biomass relative to B. vulgaris.

Taxon
B. macrocarpaBeta macrocarpae0
Material
Enfidhae1
Treatment
water deficit stresse1
Outcome
biomass productione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
1.6-e1
Comparator
B. vulgarise1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta macrocarpa
Beta macrocarpa · TaxonDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enfidha provenance showed the highest biomass production (1.6- and 3-fold compared with B. vulgaris and Soliman, respectively), under water deficit stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water deficit, Enfidha had threefold biomass relative to Soliman.

Taxon
B. macrocarpaBeta macrocarpae0
Material
Enfidhae1
Treatment
water deficit stresse1
Outcome
biomass productione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
3-folde1
Comparator
Solimane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta macrocarpa
Beta macrocarpa · TaxonDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enfidha provenance showed the highest biomass production (1.6- and 3-fold compared with B. vulgaris and Soliman, respectively), under water deficit stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–697 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both species partly restored growth after rehydration to 100% field capacity.

Taxon
Beta vulgarisBeta vulgarise0
Treatment
recovery at 100% FCe1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
re-establishmente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of water deficit stress and recovery on growth, photosynthesis, physiological and biochemical parameters were investigated in the cultivated Beta vulgaris and in two Tunisian provenances (Soliman and Enfidha) of its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“A partial re-establishment of growth occurred in both species upon recovery at 100% FC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered net CO2 assimilation by 66% in B. vulgaris relative to control.

Taxon
B. vulgarisBeta vulgarise0e1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
net CO2 assimilatione1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
–66%e1
Comparator
Controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sensitivity of B. vulgaris and Soliman provenance to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sensitivity of B. vulgaris and Soliman provenance to drought was associated with the disturbance of leaf water status and the sharp decrease in net CO2 assimilation (–66% and –82% as compared with the Control, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered net CO2 assimilation by 82% in Soliman relative to control.

Taxon
B. macrocarpaBeta macrocarpae0
Material
Solimane1
Treatment
droughte1
Outcome
net CO2 assimilatione1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
–82%e1
Comparator
Controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta macrocarpa
Beta macrocarpa · TaxonDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sensitivity of B. vulgaris and Soliman provenance to drought was associated with the disturbance of leaf water status and the sharp decrease in net CO2 assimilation (–66% and –82% as compared with the Control, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–1014 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enfidha better drought behavior was related to higher photosynthetic capacity and leaf relative water content.

Taxon
B. macrocarpaBeta macrocarpae0
Material
Enfidhae1
Organ / stage
leafe1
Outcome
photosynthetic capacity and leaf relative water contente1
Direction
bettere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta macrocarpa
Beta macrocarpa · TaxonDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“the better behaviour of Enfidha provenance was related to its better photosynthetic capacity and leaf relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1157 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enfidha accumulated more proline, glycine, and glutamine with better drought behavior.

Taxon
B. macrocarpaBeta macrocarpae0
Material
Enfidhae1
Outcome
accumulation of amino acids (proline, glycine, and glutamine)e1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta macrocarpa
Beta macrocarpa · TaxonDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“the better behaviour of Enfidha provenance was related to its better photosynthetic capacity and leaf relative water content, along with a higher accumulation of amino acids (proline, glycine, and glutamine) implied in the osmotic adjustment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly increased leaf hexose concentration in both species.

Taxon
Beta vulgarisBeta vulgarise0
Treatment
drought stresse1
Outcome
Leaf hexose concentratione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of water deficit stress and recovery on growth, photosynthesis, physiological and biochemical parameters were investigated in the cultivated Beta vulgaris and in two Tunisian provenances (Soliman and Enfidha) of its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf hexose concentration increased significantly under drought stress in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1362 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered leaf sucrose concentration in B. vulgaris.

Taxon
B. vulgarisBeta vulgarise0e1
Treatment
drought-stressede1
Outcome
leaf sucrose concentratione1
Direction
declinede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sensitivity of B. vulgaris and Soliman provenance to drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf sucrose concentration declined only in drought-stressed B. vulgaris and Soliman provenance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought lowered leaf sucrose concentration in Soliman.

Taxon
B. macrocarpaBeta macrocarpae0
Material
Solimane1
Treatment
drought-stressede1
Outcome
leaf sucrose concentratione1
Direction
declinede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta macrocarpa
Beta macrocarpa · TaxonDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf sucrose concentration declined only in drought-stressed B. vulgaris and Soliman provenance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1466 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased leaf glutamate dehydrogenase activity in both species, more in B. vulgaris.

Taxon
Beta vulgarisBeta vulgarise0
Treatment
water deficite1
Gene
glutamate dehydrogenasee1
Outcome
Leaf glutamate dehydrogenase activitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris
Beta vulgaris · TaxonMichael Bakker Paiva · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effects of water deficit stress and recovery on growth, photosynthesis, physiological and biochemical parameters were investigated in the cultivated Beta vulgaris and in two Tunisian provenances (Soliman and Enfidha) of its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf glutamate dehydrogenase activity increased under water deficit in both species despite to a higher extent in B. vulgaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1593 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose Enfidha B. macrocarpa for marginal arid ecosystems to improve pastoral value.

Taxon
B. macrocarpaBeta macrocarpae0
Material
Enfidhae1
Outcome
limit the deficit in fodder and to improve the pastoral valuee0
Setting
marginal arid ecosystemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta macrocarpa
Beta macrocarpa · TaxonDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. macrocarpa could be used in the marginal arid ecosystems in order to limit the deficit in fodder and to improve the pastoral value of these regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1793–1943 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enfidha provenance of the spontaneous species B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1806 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose B. macrocarpa as a gene source for breeding water deficit tolerance.

Taxon
B. macrocarpaBeta macrocarpae0
Outcome
source of genes for genetic improvement to water deficit stresse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta macrocarpa
Beta macrocarpa · TaxonDenis Barthel · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its wild relative B. macrocarpa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–255 · show in text ↑
e1

“this species could serve as a source of genes for genetic improvement to water deficit stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1958–2051 · show in text ↑

rewatering · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.