Paper · 1997 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Circadian Regulation of Sucrose Phosphate Synthase Activity in Tomato by Protein Phosphatase Activity

T. L. Jones; D. R. Ort

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), a key enzyme in sucrose biosynthesis, is regulated by protein phosphorylation and shows a circadian pattern of activity in tomato. SPS is most active in its dephosphorylated state, which normally coincides with daytime. Applying okadaic acid, a potent protein phosphatase inhibitor, prevents SPS activation. More interesting is that a brief treatment with cycloheximide, a cytoplasmic translation inhibitor, also prevents the light activation of SPS without any effect on the amount of SPS protein. Cordycepin, an inhibitor of transcript synthesis and processing, has the same effect. Both of these inhibitors also prevent the activation phase of the circadian rhythm in SPS activity. Conversely, cycloheximide and cordycepin do not prevent the decline in circadian SPS activity that normally occurs at night. These observations indicate that SPS phosphatase activity but not SPS kinase activity is controlled, directly or indirectly, at the level of gene expression. Taken together, these data imply that there is a circadian rhythm controlling the transcription of a protein phosphatase that subsequently dictates the circadian rhythm in SPS activity via effects on this enzyme's phosphorylation state.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato SPS activity followed a circadian pattern and was highest when dephosphorylated during daytime.

Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
SPS is most active in its dephosphorylated statee0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPS is most active in its dephosphorylated state, which normally coincides with daytime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Okadaic acid prevented SPS activation.

Treatment
okadaic acide0
Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
SPS activatione0
Direction
preventse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applying okadaic acid, a potent protein phosphatase inhibitor, prevents SPS activation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycloheximide prevented light activation of SPS.

Treatment
cycloheximidee0
Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
light activation of SPSe0
Direction
preventse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a brief treatment with cycloheximide, a cytoplasmic translation inhibitor, also prevents the light activation of SPS without any effect on the amount of SPS protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycloheximide did not change the amount of SPS protein.

Treatment
cycloheximidee0
Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
amount of SPS proteine0
Direction
without any effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a brief treatment with cycloheximide, a cytoplasmic translation inhibitor, also prevents the light activation of SPS without any effect on the amount of SPS protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cordycepin likewise prevented light activation of SPS.

Treatment
Cordycepine0
Gene
Sucrose Phosphate Synthaset0
Outcome
same effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cordycepin, an inhibitor of transcript synthesis and processing, has the same effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sucrose Phosphate Synthase Activity in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycloheximide prevented the activation phase of the SPS circadian rhythm.

Treatment
inhibitorse0
Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
activation phase of the circadian rhythm in SPS activitye0
Direction
prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both of these inhibitors also prevent the activation phase of the circadian rhythm in SPS activity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycloheximide did not prevent the nighttime decline in SPS activity.

Treatment
cycloheximidee0
Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
decline in circadian SPS activitye0
Direction
do not prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cycloheximide and cordycepin do not prevent the decline in circadian SPS activity that normally occurs at night.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cordycepin did not prevent the nighttime decline in SPS activity.

Treatment
cordycepine0
Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
decline in circadian SPS activitye0
Direction
do not prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cycloheximide and cordycepin do not prevent the decline in circadian SPS activity that normally occurs at night.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–843 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors inferred that phosphatase activity, but not kinase activity, is controlled at the level of gene expression.

Gene
SPSe0
Outcome
SPS phosphatase activitye0
Qualifier
at the level of gene expressione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SPS phosphatase activity but not SPS kinase activity is controlled, directly or indirectly, at the level of gene expression.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors proposed circadian control of phosphatase transcription that governs SPS phosphorylation and activity.

Gene
protein phosphatasee0
Outcome
circadian rhythm in SPS activitye0
Qualifier
via effects on this enzyme's phosphorylation statee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is a circadian rhythm controlling the transcription of a protein phosphatase that subsequently dictates the circadian rhythm in SPS activity via effects on this enzyme's phosphorylation state.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 · show in text ↑

cycloheximide · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

cordycepin · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.