Abstract
Slurries of onion and garlic, and dried water hyacinth were applied to tomato plants infected with Meloidogyne incognita in replicated, randomized glasshouse tests. After two months, plant weights and number of root knots/g root were evaluated. There were no evidences of increased plant growth or nematode control resulting tram treatments.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Onion slurry provided no evidence of increased tomato growth or nematode control after two months.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- onione0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=60)
Meloidogyne incognitae0pathogen - Outcome
- plant growth or nematode controle1
- Direction
- no evidences of increasede1
- Setting
- glasshousee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Slurries of onion and garlic, and dried water hyacinth were applied to tomato plants infected with Meloidogyne incognita in replicated, randomized glasshouse tests.”
e1“There were no evidences of increased plant growth or nematode control resulting tram treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Garlic slurry provided no evidence of increased tomato growth or nematode control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- garlice0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- plant growth or nematode controle1
- Direction
- no evidences of increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Slurries of onion and garlic, and dried water hyacinth were applied to tomato plants infected with Meloidogyne incognita in replicated, randomized glasshouse tests.”
e1“There were no evidences of increased plant growth or nematode control resulting tram treatments.”
Claim · model-written summary
Dried water hyacinth provided no evidence of increased tomato growth or nematode control.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- dried water hyacinthe0
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
- Outcome
- plant growth or nematode controle1
- Direction
- no evidences of increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Slurries of onion and garlic, and dried water hyacinth were applied to tomato plants infected with Meloidogyne incognita in replicated, randomized glasshouse tests.”
e1“There were no evidences of increased plant growth or nematode control resulting tram treatments.”
The same questions in other papers
Pontederia crassipes · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
Allium sativum · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
7 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →processing · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.