Paper · 2010 · Nematropica

EVALUATION OF PLANT EXTRACTS AND PSEUDOMONAS FOR CONTROL OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE, MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA ON TOMATO

Kamal A. M. Abo‐Elyousr; Z. Khan; M. El-Morsi Award; et al.

11
claims
33
verbatim quotes
38
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abo-Elyousr, Kamal A., Zakaullah Khan, Magd El-Morsi Award, and Montaser Fawzy Abedel-Moneim. 2010. Evaluation of plant extracts and Pseudomonas spp. for control of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato. Nematropica 40:289-299. Fresh leaf extracts of Azadirachta indica (neem), Allium sativum (garlic) and Tagetes erecta (African marigold) and bacterial suspensions of Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. aeruginosa were tested against Meloidogyne incognita on tomato under in vitro, pots and field conditions. All treatments immobilized juveniles (J2); with the highest effect caused by neem leaves extract and the lowest by P. aeruginosa after 24 h and 48 h of exposures. In soil all treatments significantly reduced root galling, nematode population, and enhanced plant growth and yield, with bacterial treatments being the most effective. Nematode populations were reduced greater by nematicide (Vydate 10 G) treatment but the greatest increase in yield (67%) was obtained with P. fluorescens; the treatment reduced root galling by 68-70% and 48% in pot and field experiments, respectively. Among the plant species, garlic demonstrated best control reducing root galls by 57% in pots under greenhouse and 33% in field conditions and increasing fruits yield by 47%. Abo-Elyousr, Kamal A., Zakaullah Khan, Magd El-Morsi Award and Montaser Fawzy Abedel-Moneim. 2010. Evaluacion de extractos de plantas y de Pseudomonas spp. para el control de Meloidogyne incognita en tomate. Nematropica 40:289-299. Se probaron extractos frescos de hojas de Azadirachta indica (nim), Allium sativum (ajo) y Tagetes erecta (clavelon africano) y suspensions bacteriales de Pseudomonas fluorescens y P. aeruginosa para el control de Meloidogyne incognita en tomate in vitro, en macetas y en campo. Todos los tratamientos inmovilizaron los juveniles (J2); observandose el mayor efecto con el extracto de hojas de nim y el menor con el extracto de P. aeruginosa despues de 24 y 48 h de exposicion. En el suelo, todos los tratamientos redujeron significativamente el agallamiento y la densidad de poblacion del nematodo, y aumentaron el crecimiento y rendimiento de la planta, siendo los tratamientos bacteriales los mas efectivos. La mayor reduccion en las poblaciones del nematodo se observo con el tratamiento con nematicida (Vydate 10 G), pero el mayor aumento en rendimiento (67%) se obtuvo con P. fluorescens; cuyo tratamiento redujo el agallamiento en 68-70% y 48% en macetas y campo, respectivamente. Entre los tratamientos vegetales, el ajo demostro el major control de agallamiento, con una reduccion del 57% en macetas y 33% en campo, y un aumento del rendimiento del 47%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments immobilized nematode juveniles, with neem extract strongest and P. aeruginosa weakest after 24 and 48 hours.

Treatment
neem leaves extracte0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
immobilized juveniles (J2)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments immobilized juveniles (J2); with the highest effect caused by neem leaves extract and the lowest by P. aeruginosa after 24 h and 48 h of exposures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–682 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly reduced root galling in soil.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments significantly reduced root galling, nematode population, and enhanced plant growth and yield, with bacterial treatments being the most effective.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 691–851 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments significantly reduced nematode population in soil.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments significantly reduced root galling, nematode population, and enhanced plant growth and yield, with bacterial treatments being the most effective.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 691–851 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments enhanced tomato growth and yield in soil.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
plant growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments significantly reduced root galling, nematode population, and enhanced plant growth and yield, with bacterial treatments being the most effective.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 691–851 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vydate 10 G reduced nematode populations more than other treatments.

Treatment
nematicide (Vydate 10 G) treatmente0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
Nematode populationse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nematode populations were reduced greater by nematicide (Vydate 10 G) treatment but the greatest increase in yield (67%) was obtained with P. fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1005 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens produced the greatest yield increase, 67%.

Treatment
P. fluorescense0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Second interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
67%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · Second interactorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Nematode populations were reduced greater by nematicide (Vydate 10 G) treatment but the greatest increase in yield (67%) was obtained with P. fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–1005 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens reduced root galling by 68–70% in pots.

Treatment
the treatmente0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
68-70%e0
Setting
pote0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment reduced root galling by 68-70% and 48% in pot and field experiments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1103 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens reduced root galling by 48% in field experiments.

Treatment
the treatmente0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“the treatment reduced root galling by 68-70% and 48% in pot and field experiments, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1103 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced root galls by 57% in greenhouse pots.

Treatment
garlice0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
root gallse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
57%e0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“garlic demonstrated best control reducing root galls by 57% in pots under greenhouse and 33% in field conditions and increasing fruits yield by 47%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1277 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract reduced root galls by 33% in the field.

Treatment
garlice0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
root gallse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
33%e0
Setting
fielde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“garlic demonstrated best control reducing root galls by 57% in pots under greenhouse and 33% in field conditions and increasing fruits yield by 47%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1277 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic extract increased fruit yield by 47%.

Treatment
garlice0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
fruits yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“garlic demonstrated best control reducing root galls by 57% in pots under greenhouse and 33% in field conditions and increasing fruits yield by 47%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1277 · show in text ↑
t1

“MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–101 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Pseudomonas fluorescens · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Azadirachta indica · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

insecticide · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 115 positive, 2 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.