Paper · 2006 · PubMed

Soil amendment with dried weed leaves as non-chemical approach for the management of Meloidogyne incognita infecting tomato.

M A Radwan; M M Abu-Elamayem; S M Kassem; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In pot trial, dried ground weed leaves of Cynodon dactylon, Datura stramonium, Eichhomia crassipes, Emex spinosus, Ricinus communis and Sisymbrium irio were mixed with soil at the rate of 1, 3, 5 and 10 g/kg soil and compared their nematicidal potential with carbofuran as a standard against the root-knot nematode, M. incognita infecting tomato. In addition, their effects on growth rate of tomato plants were also investigated. The results showed that M. incognita populations in the soil and root galling were significantly suppressed when the dried leaves of the tested weeds at all rates were allowed to decompose in the soil. All amendments exhibited varying degree of reduction compared to control. The highest reduction was noticeable with the plants grown in Sisymbrium irio amended soil followed by Datura stramonium and Emex spinosus. In addition, employing high rate of the tested weeds gave higher activity in suppressing the nematode both in the soil and in tomato roots than using low rate. The data also indicated that all amendments at low rates significantly increased growth indices of tomato over control treatment, except Cynodon dactylon and Emex spinosus which decreased it, particularly in the shoot system. On the other hand, their high rates showed phytotoxic effects. These weed species may offer considerable promise as soil amendments for control of root-knot nematode, M. incognita.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed leaf amendments at all rates significantly suppressed soil nematode populations.

Treatment
dried leaves of the tested weeds at all ratese0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita populations in the soile0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“M. incognita populations in the soil and root galling were significantly suppressed when the dried leaves of the tested weeds at all rates were allowed to decompose in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed leaf amendments at all rates significantly suppressed tomato root galling.

Treatment
dried leaves of the tested weeds at all ratese0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“M. incognita populations in the soil and root galling were significantly suppressed when the dried leaves of the tested weeds at all rates were allowed to decompose in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–630 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sisymbrium irio amendment gave the highest reduction in nematode outcomes.

Treatment
Sisymbrium irio amended soile0
Outcome
reductione0
Direction
highest reductione0
Comparator
Datura stramonium and Emex spinosuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest reduction was noticeable with the plants grown in Sisymbrium irio amended soil followed by Datura stramonium and Emex spinosus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–844 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High amendment rates suppressed the nematode more than low rates in soil and tomato roots.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
high rate of the tested weedse0
Outcome
suppressing the nematode both in the soil and in tomato rootse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
low ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“high rate of the tested weeds gave higher activity in suppressing the nematode both in the soil and in tomato roots than using low rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1004 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most low rate amendments significantly increased tomato growth indices over control.

Treatment
all amendments at low ratese0
Outcome
growth indicese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all amendments at low rates significantly increased growth indices of tomato over control treatment, except Cynodon dactylon and Emex spinosus which decreased it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rate Cynodon dactylon amendment decreased tomato growth indices.

Treatment
Cynodon dactylone0
Outcome
growth indicese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all amendments at low rates significantly increased growth indices of tomato over control treatment, except Cynodon dactylon and Emex spinosus which decreased it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rate Emex spinosus amendment decreased tomato growth indices.

Treatment
Emex spinosuse0
Outcome
growth indicese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all amendments at low rates significantly increased growth indices of tomato over control treatment, except Cynodon dactylon and Emex spinosus which decreased it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High rates of weed leaf amendments were phytotoxic.

Treatment
high ratese0
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“their high rates showed phytotoxic effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1293 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose weed leaf amendments for root knot nematode control.

Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
soil amendments for control of root-knot nematodee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These weed species may offer considerable promise as soil amendments for control of root-knot nematode, M. incognita.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1412 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 117–123 · show in text ↑

Cynodon dactylon · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

processing · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

other · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 157 positive, 18 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.