Abstract
Despite the well-documented model-simulated adverse climate change impact on rice yields reported elsewhere, interventions to address the issue seems still limited, particularly at local level. This links to the uncertainty that entails to climate projection and its likely future impact, which varies across regions and climate models. The study analyzes climate change-induced yield reduction and the adequacy of current adaptations to cope with the large range of impact under various climate models. Seventeen General Circulation Models (GCMs) under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) climate change scenarios of RCP8.5 and RCP4.5, combined with CROPWAT model were used for near-future (2011-2040) and far-future (2041-2070) projections. The output confirms yield reduction to occur in the near-future, to the extent variable across the GCMs. At the highest estimation, rice yield decreases by 32.00% and 31.81%, in comparison to baseline, for near-future under RCP8.5 and RCP4.5, respectively. The reduction extends, with a slightly higher degree, to the far-future. The reduction is sensitive to variation in farming practices of the local farmers, in particular that in planting time and irrigation scheduling. The shifting of planting time to better match rainfall pattern and improved irrigation reduced the yield reduction by 16.16% and 15.18%, respectively. The combined impact of the two, however, still leaves un-tapped a reduction of 5.86%, suggesting that planned interventions are still required to improve the current farm management. The findings provide valuable inputs for relevant authorities to understand the whole continuum of climate change-induced rice yield reduction, based on which sets of planned interventions locally specific for the areas could be developed, accordingly.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Projected rice yield decreased 32.00% under RCP8.5.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Outcome
- rice yielde0
- Direction
- decreasese0
- Value
- 32.00%e0
- Qualifier
- RCP8.5e0
- Comparator
- baselinee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the highest estimation, rice yield decreases by 32.00% and 31.81%, in comparison to baseline, for near-future under RCP8.5 and RCP4.5, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Projected rice yield decreased 31.81% under RCP4.5.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Outcome
- rice yielde0
- Direction
- decreasese0
- Value
- 31.81%e0
- Qualifier
- RCP4.5e0
- Comparator
- baselinee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the highest estimation, rice yield decreases by 32.00% and 31.81%, in comparison to baseline, for near-future under RCP8.5 and RCP4.5, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
shifting of planting time to better match rainfall pattern reduced projected rice yield loss by 16.16%.
- Treatment
- shifting of planting time to better match rainfall patterne0
- Outcome
- yield reductione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 16.16%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The shifting of planting time to better match rainfall pattern and improved irrigation reduced the yield reduction by 16.16% and 15.18%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
improved irrigation reduced projected rice yield loss by 15.18%.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“The shifting of planting time to better match rainfall pattern and improved irrigation reduced the yield reduction by 16.16% and 15.18%, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combining adaptation measures left a projected rice yield reduction of 5.86%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The combined impact of the two, however, still leaves un-tapped a reduction of 5.86%”
The same questions in other papers
rainfall · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →sowing time · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
189 papers more in this group
See all 193 papers →irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,167 papers more in this group
See all 1,171 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.