Paper · 2014 · International Journal of Ecosystem

Climate Change Impact on Rice Yield and Adaptation Response of Local Farmers in Sumedang District, West Java, Indonesia

Ade Candradijaya; Cecep Kusmana; Yusman Syaukat; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Despite the well-documented model-simulated adverse climate change impact on rice yields reported elsewhere, interventions to address the issue seems still limited, particularly at local level. This links to the uncertainty that entails to climate projection and its likely future impact, which varies across regions and climate models. The study analyzes climate change-induced yield reduction and the adequacy of current adaptations to cope with the large range of impact under various climate models. Seventeen General Circulation Models (GCMs) under Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) climate change scenarios of RCP8.5 and RCP4.5, combined with CROPWAT model were used for near-future (2011-2040) and far-future (2041-2070) projections. The output confirms yield reduction to occur in the near-future, to the extent variable across the GCMs. At the highest estimation, rice yield decreases by 32.00% and 31.81%, in comparison to baseline, for near-future under RCP8.5 and RCP4.5, respectively. The reduction extends, with a slightly higher degree, to the far-future. The reduction is sensitive to variation in farming practices of the local farmers, in particular that in planting time and irrigation scheduling. The shifting of planting time to better match rainfall pattern and improved irrigation reduced the yield reduction by 16.16% and 15.18%, respectively. The combined impact of the two, however, still leaves un-tapped a reduction of 5.86%, suggesting that planned interventions are still required to improve the current farm management. The findings provide valuable inputs for relevant authorities to understand the whole continuum of climate change-induced rice yield reduction, based on which sets of planned interventions locally specific for the areas could be developed, accordingly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Projected rice yield decreased 32.00% under RCP8.5.

Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
32.00%e0
Qualifier
RCP8.5e0
Comparator
baselinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the highest estimation, rice yield decreases by 32.00% and 31.81%, in comparison to baseline, for near-future under RCP8.5 and RCP4.5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1008 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Projected rice yield decreased 31.81% under RCP4.5.

Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
31.81%e0
Qualifier
RCP4.5e0
Comparator
baselinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the highest estimation, rice yield decreases by 32.00% and 31.81%, in comparison to baseline, for near-future under RCP8.5 and RCP4.5, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

shifting of planting time to better match rainfall pattern reduced projected rice yield loss by 16.16%.

Treatment
shifting of planting time to better match rainfall patterne0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16.16%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The shifting of planting time to better match rainfall pattern and improved irrigation reduced the yield reduction by 16.16% and 15.18%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

improved irrigation reduced projected rice yield loss by 15.18%.

Treatment
improved irrigatione0
Outcome
yield reductione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
15.18%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The shifting of planting time to better match rainfall pattern and improved irrigation reduced the yield reduction by 16.16% and 15.18%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1378 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativeprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Combining adaptation measures left a projected rice yield reduction of 5.86%.

Outcome
reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
5.86%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The combined impact of the two, however, still leaves un-tapped a reduction of 5.86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1463 · show in text ↑

rainfall · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 29 positive, 22 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

sowing time · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 123 positive, 70 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.