Paper · 2017 · Agronomy Journal

Ammonia Volatilization, Rice Yield, and Nitrogen Uptake Responses to Simulated Rainfall and Urease Inhibitor

Randy J. Dempsey; Nathan A. Slaton; Richard. J. Norman; et al.

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Rainfall between preflood urea‐N application and flooding can be detrimental to rice grain yield. Use of the NBPT reduces yield loss from N transformations facilitated by rainfall between the urea application and flooding. Rainfall after urea application appears to reduce NH 3 loss but enhance denitrification. The effect of rainfall between urea application and flood establishment on rice ( Oryza sativa L.) grain yield has not been studied. We compared the effects of simulated rainfall amount and N‐(n‐butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) urease inhibitor rate on NH 3 volatilization and rice growth. Three field experiments were conducted and NH 3 volatilization was measured in two trials for 11 d after urea application (DAA). Untreated urea (Urea) or NBPT‐treated urea (NBPT‐Urea) was subjected to six simulated rainfall amounts (0–25.4 mm) applied 5 to 15 h after fertilizer application and flooded 7 to 12 DAA. Cumulative NH 3 loss from Urea accounted for 8.6% of the applied N (112–118 kg N ha −1 ) with no simulated rainfall and decreased quadratically to 0.6% with 25.4 mm of simulated rainfall. Cumulative NH 3 loss from NBPT‐Urea decreased quadratically as simulated rainfall amount increased but loss was 0.2 to 2.0% of the applied N. Depending on the site, yields of rice fertilized with Urea decreased linearly or nonlinearly as simulated rainfall increased with the greatest yield produced by rice receiving no simulated rainfall. The yields of rice fertilized with NBPT‐Urea were not affected by simulated rainfall amount in two trials. In the third trial, the yields of rice receiving NBPT‐Urea decreased nonlinearly as simulated rainfall amount increased but were 8.9 to 18.1% (746–1376 kg ha −1 ) greater than the yields of Urea‐fertilized rice. Rainfall following urea application reduces NH 3 loss but appears to increase N loss via denitrification. Based on yield results, total N loss was reduced when urea was treated with NBPT.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With untreated urea, simulated rainfall reduced cumulative ammonia loss from 8.6% to 0.6% of applied nitrogen.

Treatment
25.4 mm of simulated rainfalle0
Outcome
Cumulative NH 3 losse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.6%e0
Qualifier
8.6% of the applied Ne0
Comparator
no simulated rainfalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cumulative NH 3 loss from Urea accounted for 8.6% of the applied N (112–118 kg N ha −1 ) with no simulated rainfall and decreased quadratically to 0.6% with 25.4 mm of simulated rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1120 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With NBPT-treated urea, ammonia loss fell as simulated rainfall increased and ranged from 0.2 to 2.0% of applied nitrogen.

Treatment
simulated rainfalle0
Outcome
Cumulative NH 3 losse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.2 to 2.0% of the applied Ne0
Qualifier
NBPT‐Ureae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cumulative NH 3 loss from NBPT‐Urea decreased quadratically as simulated rainfall amount increased but loss was 0.2 to 2.0% of the applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1262 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–421 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice yield with untreated urea decreased as simulated rainfall increased, and was greatest with no simulated rainfall.

Treatment
simulated rainfalle0
Outcome
yields of ricee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
no simulated rainfalle0

Not reportedQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields of rice fertilized with Urea decreased linearly or nonlinearly as simulated rainfall increased with the greatest yield produced by rice receiving no simulated rainfall”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1461 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In two trials, simulated rainfall amount did not affect rice yield with NBPT-treated urea.

Treatment
simulated rainfall amounte0
Outcome
yields of ricee0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
two trialse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields of rice fertilized with NBPT‐Urea were not affected by simulated rainfall amount in two trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In a third trial, yield with NBPT-treated urea decreased nonlinearly as simulated rainfall increased.

Treatment
simulated rainfall amounte0
Outcome
yields of ricee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
third triale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the third trial, the yields of rice receiving NBPT‐Urea decreased nonlinearly as simulated rainfall amount increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third trial, NBPT-treated urea produced 8.9 to 18.1% greater rice yields than untreated urea.

Treatment
NBPT‐Ureae0
Outcome
yields of ricee0
Direction
greatere0
Value
8.9 to 18.1%e0
Qualifier
746–1376 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
Urea‐fertilized ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields of rice receiving NBPT‐Urea decreased nonlinearly as simulated rainfall amount increased but were 8.9 to 18.1% (746–1376 kg ha −1 ) greater than the yields of Urea‐fertilized rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1780 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred that rainfall after urea application increased nitrogen loss through denitrification.

Treatment
Rainfall following urea applicatione0
Outcome
N loss via denitrificatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rainfall following urea application reduces NH 3 loss but appears to increase N loss via denitrification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1782–1886 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–421 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors inferred from yield that NBPT treatment reduced total nitrogen loss.

Treatment
urea was treated with NBPTe0
Outcome
total N losse0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Based on yield results, total N loss was reduced when urea was treated with NBPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1888–1968 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice ( Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–421 · show in text ↑

rainfall · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 29 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.