Paper · 1998 · Agronomy Journal

Cultivar, Nitrogen, and Moisture Effects on a Rice‐Wheat Sequence: Experimentation and Simulation

Jagadish Timsina; Upendra Singh; Mohammed Badaruddin; et al.

16
claims
18
verbatim quotes
52
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) followed by wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is a dominant cropping sequence under a range of management regimes in South Asia, with variable productivity. Simulation models can be used to extrapolate experimental results to other sites of interest in variable environments. Experiments were conducted to quantify the responses of two rice cultivars to three N regimes and two soil moisture regimes, followed by the responses of the succeeding two wheat cultivars to three N regimes, two soil moisture regimes, and two dates of planting, on a Haplaquept noncalcareous brown floodplain soil at the Wheat Research Center, Nashipur, Bangladesh. CERES‐Rice and CERES‐Wheat models were validated using the experimental data set, and then were used to estimate the grain yields at two other sites in Bangladesh. In rainfed plots, grain yields of ‘BR14’ rice were reduced by 48.8, 43.4, and 39.3% relative to irrigated plots, and those of ‘BR11’ were reduced by 49.1, 43.8, and 42.2% ( P < 0.05), for 0, 90, and 135 kg N ha −1 , respectively. The optimum N rate was between 90 and 135 kg ha −1 . In the succeeding wheat crop, at 0 N, there were no significant differences between the two moisture regimes but, at high N (180 kg ha −1 ), irrigation promoted greater yield. Relative to the high‐N treatment, grain yields of irrigated ‘Kanchan’ wheat at 0 N were reduced by 73.0 and 71.6%, and of ‘Sowgat’ by 75.2 and 73.5%, for early and late plantings, respectively. Simulation investigated year‐to‐year variation in grain yields of both crops under their several N regimes. Rice yields tended to increase over years, but wheat yields had no definite trend. The simulation results indicated that, without N fertilizer application, N will be limiting across sites and long‐term weather conditions for both rainfed and irrigated crops. Field experimentation quantified actual crop responses to a range of management practices and allowed validating the models for the rice‐wheat sequence. The models were then used to extrapolate and generalize the results for two other sites in Bangladesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed BR14 rice yield fell by 48.8% against irrigated plots at 0 N.

Material
‘BR14’e0
Treatment
rainfed plotse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
48.8e0
Qualifier
0e0
Comparator
irrigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In rainfed plots, grain yields of ‘BR14’ rice were reduced by 48.8, 43.4, and 39.3% relative to irrigated plots, and those of ‘BR11’ were reduced by 49.1, 43.8, and 42.2% ( P < 0.05), for 0, 90, and 135 kg N ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed BR14 rice yield fell by 43.4% against irrigated plots at 90 kg N ha −1.

Material
‘BR14’e0
Treatment
rainfed plotse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
43.4e0
Qualifier
90e0
Comparator
irrigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In rainfed plots, grain yields of ‘BR14’ rice were reduced by 48.8, 43.4, and 39.3% relative to irrigated plots, and those of ‘BR11’ were reduced by 49.1, 43.8, and 42.2% ( P < 0.05), for 0, 90, and 135 kg N ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed BR14 rice yield fell by 39.3% against irrigated plots at 135 kg N ha −1.

Material
‘BR14’e0
Treatment
rainfed plotse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
39.3%e0
Qualifier
135 kg N ha −1e0
Comparator
irrigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In rainfed plots, grain yields of ‘BR14’ rice were reduced by 48.8, 43.4, and 39.3% relative to irrigated plots, and those of ‘BR11’ were reduced by 49.1, 43.8, and 42.2% ( P < 0.05), for 0, 90, and 135 kg N ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed BR11 rice yield fell by 49.1% against irrigated plots at 0 N.

Material
‘BR11’e0
Treatment
rainfed plotse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
49.1e0
Comparator
irrigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In rainfed plots, grain yields of ‘BR14’ rice were reduced by 48.8, 43.4, and 39.3% relative to irrigated plots, and those of ‘BR11’ were reduced by 49.1, 43.8, and 42.2% ( P < 0.05), for 0, 90, and 135 kg N ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed BR11 rice yield fell by 43.8% against irrigated plots at 90 kg N ha −1.

Material
‘BR11’e0
Treatment
rainfed plotse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
43.8e0
Comparator
irrigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In rainfed plots, grain yields of ‘BR14’ rice were reduced by 48.8, 43.4, and 39.3% relative to irrigated plots, and those of ‘BR11’ were reduced by 49.1, 43.8, and 42.2% ( P < 0.05), for 0, 90, and 135 kg N ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1065 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed BR11 rice yield fell by 42.2% against irrigated plots at 135 kg N ha −1.

Material
‘BR11’e0
Treatment
rainfed plotse0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
42.2%e0
Comparator
irrigated plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In rainfed plots, grain yields of ‘BR14’ rice were reduced by 48.8, 43.4, and 39.3% relative to irrigated plots, and those of ‘BR11’ were reduced by 49.1, 43.8, and 42.2% ( P < 0.05), for 0, 90, and 135 kg N ha −1 , respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–1065 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum rice N rate was between 90 and 135 kg ha −1.

Outcome
optimum N ratee0
Value
between 90 and 135 kg ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum N rate was between 90 and 135 kg ha −1 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 N, wheat yield did not differ significantly between moisture regimes.

Treatment
two moisture regimese0
Outcome
no significant differencese0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Qualifier
0 Ne0
Comparator
two moisture regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the succeeding wheat crop, at 0 N, there were no significant differences between the two moisture regimes but, at high N (180 kg ha −1 ), irrigation promoted greater yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 180 kg N ha −1, irrigation increased wheat yield.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
180 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
two moisture regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the succeeding wheat crop, at 0 N, there were no significant differences between the two moisture regimes but, at high N (180 kg ha −1 ), irrigation promoted greater yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 N, irrigated Kanchan wheat yield was reduced 73.0% at early planting against high N.

Material
‘Kanchan’e0
Treatment
0 Ne0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
73.0e0
Qualifier
earlye0
Comparator
high‐N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the high‐N treatment, grain yields of irrigated ‘Kanchan’ wheat at 0 N were reduced by 73.0 and 71.6%, and of ‘Sowgat’ by 75.2 and 73.5%, for early and late plantings, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 N, irrigated Kanchan wheat yield was reduced 71.6% at late planting against high N.

Material
‘Kanchan’e0
Treatment
0 Ne0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
71.6%e0
Qualifier
latee0
Comparator
high‐N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the high‐N treatment, grain yields of irrigated ‘Kanchan’ wheat at 0 N were reduced by 73.0 and 71.6%, and of ‘Sowgat’ by 75.2 and 73.5%, for early and late plantings, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 N, irrigated Sowgat wheat yield was reduced 75.2% at early planting against high N.

Material
‘Sowgat’e0
Treatment
0 Ne0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75.2e0
Qualifier
earlye0
Comparator
high‐N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the high‐N treatment, grain yields of irrigated ‘Kanchan’ wheat at 0 N were reduced by 73.0 and 71.6%, and of ‘Sowgat’ by 75.2 and 73.5%, for early and late plantings, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0 N, irrigated Sowgat wheat yield was reduced 73.5% at late planting against high N.

Material
‘Sowgat’e0
Treatment
0 Ne0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
73.5%e0
Qualifier
latee0
Comparator
high‐N treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative to the high‐N treatment, grain yields of irrigated ‘Kanchan’ wheat at 0 N were reduced by 73.0 and 71.6%, and of ‘Sowgat’ by 75.2 and 73.5%, for early and late plantings, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated rice yield tended to increase over years.

Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yields tended to increase over years, but wheat yields had no definite trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated wheat yield had no definite trend over years.

Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
no definite trende0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yields tended to increase over years, but wheat yields had no definite trend.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1679 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Simulations indicated nitrogen limitation without fertilizer across sites and weather conditions for rice and wheat.

Treatment
without N fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
N will be limitinge0
Setting
across sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without N fertilizer application, N will be limiting across sites and long‐term weather conditions for both rainfed and irrigated crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1855 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice‐Wheat Sequence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–65 · show in text ↑

rainfall · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 29 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.