Paper · 2007 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)

I.B. Pandey; D. K. Dwivedi; R.K. Pandey

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during winter (rabi) season of 2002–03 and 2003–04 to study the efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Fiori & Paol.). The intensity of weeds as well as total weed count were unaffected by the method and level of fertilizer application, but side placement of fertilizer significantly reduced the total dry biomass of weeds, NPK depletion by weeds that improved the NPK uptake by the crop and produced 13.5 per cent higher grain yield than broadcast method of fertilizer application. Application of 125 per cent of the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) although recorded significantly higher dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds than 75 per cent of the RDF, it increased the NPK uptake by crop and grain yield. Weed-control treatments significantly reduced the intensity of broad-leaf weeds, annual and perennial grasses, total weed count, dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds, and increased the NPK uptake by the crop. These treatments increased the grain yield by 26.3–35.9 per cent than the weedy check. Among the weed-control treatments, sulfosulfuron proved the most effective herbicide against broad-leaf weeds and annual grasses, reducing their intensity as well as that of total weeds than the mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturon and hand-weeding but had no adverse effect on perennial grasses and sedges. However, hand-weeding significantly reduced the intensity of perennial grasses and sedges. Sulfosulfuron also recorded significanty lower total dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds than the mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturon and showed the highest weed-control efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application method and level did not alter weed intensity or count.

Treatment
method and level of fertilizer applicatione0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
intensity of weeds as well as total weed counte0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensity of weeds as well as total weed count were unaffected by the method and level of fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Side placement reduced weed biomass and weed NPK depletion.

Treatment
side placement of fertilizere0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total dry biomass of weeds, NPK depletion by weedse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
broadcast method of fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensity of weeds as well as total weed count were unaffected by the method and level of fertilizer application, but side placement of fertilizer significantly reduced the total dry biomass of weeds, NPK depletion by weeds that improved the NPK uptake by the crop and produced 13.5 per cent higher grain yield than broadcast method of fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Side placement improved wheat NPK uptake.

Treatment
side placement of fertilizere0
Outcome
NPK uptake by the crope0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
broadcast method of fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensity of weeds as well as total weed count were unaffected by the method and level of fertilizer application, but side placement of fertilizer significantly reduced the total dry biomass of weeds, NPK depletion by weeds that improved the NPK uptake by the crop and produced 13.5 per cent higher grain yield than broadcast method of fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Side placement raised grain yield by 13.5 percent.

Treatment
side placement of fertilizere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.5 per cente0
Comparator
broadcast method of fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensity of weeds as well as total weed count were unaffected by the method and level of fertilizer application, but side placement of fertilizer significantly reduced the total dry biomass of weeds, NPK depletion by weeds that improved the NPK uptake by the crop and produced 13.5 per cent higher grain yield than broadcast method of fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% fertilizer increased weed biomass and NPK depletion relative to 75%.

Treatment
125 per cent of the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF)e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weedse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
75 per cent of the RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“125 per cent of the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) although recorded significantly higher dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds than 75 per cent of the RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

125% fertilizer increased wheat NPK uptake and grain yield.

Treatment
125 per cent of the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF)e0
Outcome
NPK uptake by crop and grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
75 per cent of the RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 125 per cent of the recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) although recorded significantly higher dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds than 75 per cent of the RDF, it increased the NPK uptake by crop and grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed treatments reduced weed intensity, count, biomass, and NPK depletion.

Treatment
Weed-control treatmentse0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
intensity of broad-leaf weeds, annual and perennial grassese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed-control treatments significantly reduced the intensity of broad-leaf weeds, annual and perennial grasses, total weed count, dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds, and increased the NPK uptake by the crop. These treatments increased the grain yield by 26.3–35.9 per cent than the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed treatments increased crop NPK uptake.

Treatment
Weed-control treatmentse0
Outcome
NPK uptake by the crope0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed-control treatments significantly reduced the intensity of broad-leaf weeds, annual and perennial grasses, total weed count, dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds, and increased the NPK uptake by the crop. These treatments increased the grain yield by 26.3–35.9 per cent than the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed treatments increased wheat grain yield by 26.3–35.9%.

Treatment
Weed-control treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.3–35.9 per cente0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed-control treatments significantly reduced the intensity of broad-leaf weeds, annual and perennial grasses, total weed count, dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds, and increased the NPK uptake by the crop. These treatments increased the grain yield by 26.3–35.9 per cent than the weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron suppressed broad-leaf and annual grass weeds more than alternatives.

Treatment
sulfosulfurone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
intensitye0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturon and hand-weedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sulfosulfuron proved the most effective herbicide against broad-leaf weeds and annual grasses, reducing their intensity as well as that of total weeds than the mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturon and hand-weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron had no adverse effect on perennial grasses and sedges.

Treatment
sulfosulfurone1
Interactor
perennial grasses and sedgese0weed
Outcome
perennial grasses and sedgese0
Direction
no adverse effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no adverse effect on perennial grasses and sedges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1376–1429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulfosulfuron proved the most effective herbicide against broad-leaf weeds and annual grasses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding reduced perennial grass and sedge intensity.

Treatment
hand-weedinge0
Interactor
perennial grasses and sedgese0weed
Outcome
intensity of perennial grasses and sedgese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hand-weeding significantly reduced the intensity of perennial grasses and sedges”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1520 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron reduced weed biomass and NPK depletion more than the herbicide mixture.

Treatment
Sulfosulfurone0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weedse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfosulfuron also recorded significanty lower total dry biomass of weeds and NPK depletion by weeds than the mixture of 2,4-D + isoproturon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1662 · show in text ↑
t0

“Efficacy of herbicides and fertilizer management on weed dynamics in wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

fertilization · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

85 papers: 49 positive, 36 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

herbicide · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 21 positive, 10 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 28 positive, 5 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.