Paper · 2010 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra

S. C. Dhawan; Satyendra Singh

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting okra was achieved through in-vitro, in-vivo and micro plot trials by an antagonistic fungus, Pochonia chlamydosporia. Effect of seed treatment and soil application of P. chlamydosporia was studied at various doses under in-vivo and micro plots. A 96% egg parasitism of M. incognita by P. chlamydosporia was recorded in laboratory condition. P. chlamydosporia caused significantly enhanced plant health and suppressed M.incognita population in all the treated plants. The highest recovery up to 81% in plant vigor was recorded in the treatment that received soil application of the P. chlamydosporia @ 3% w/w under pot trial. In micro plot trial, a general increase in all the growth parameters was observed in all the treatments receiving P. chlamydosporia except root weight that was greatest in control (Nematode only). The highest recovery in plant vigor with maximum reduction in nematode multiplication including final soil population was recorded in treatment that received soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/w over control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Management of Meloidogyne incognita on okra was achieved through in-vitro, in-vivo and micro plot trials using Pochonia chlamydosporia.

Treatment
an antagonistic fungus, Pochonia chlamydosporiae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Management of root-knot nematodee1
Direction
was achievede1
Setting
in-vitro, in-vivo and micro plot trialse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“Management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting okra was achieved through in-vitro, in-vivo and micro plot trials by an antagonistic fungus, Pochonia chlamydosporia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–182 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia chlamydosporia parasitised 96% of Meloidogyne incognita eggs in laboratory conditions.

Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg parasitisme2
Value
96%e2
Setting
laboratory conditione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e2

“A 96% egg parasitism of M. incognita by P. chlamydosporia was recorded in laboratory condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia chlamydosporia significantly enhanced plant health of okra.

Treatment
P. chlamydosporiae3
Outcome
plant healthe3
Direction
significantly enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“P. chlamydosporia caused significantly enhanced plant health and suppressed M.incognita population in all the treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia chlamydosporia suppressed the Meloidogyne incognita population in okra plants.

Treatment
P. chlamydosporiae3
Interactor
M.incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae3pathogen
Outcome
M.incognita populatione3
Direction
suppressede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e3

“P. chlamydosporia caused significantly enhanced plant health and suppressed M.incognita population in all the treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest recovery of plant vigour, up to 81%, was obtained with soil application of Pochonia chlamydosporia at 3% w/w under pot trial.

Treatment
soil application of the P. chlamydosporia @ 3% w/we4
Interactor
P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae4biocontrol_agent
Outcome
plant vigore4
Direction
higheste4
Value
81%e4
Setting
pot triale4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest recovery up to 81% in plant vigor was recorded in the treatment that received soil application of the P. chlamydosporia @ 3% w/w under pot trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–689 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pochonia chlamydosporia in micro plot trials generally increased all growth parameters of okra.

Treatment
P. chlamydosporiae5
Outcome
growth parameterse5
Direction
general increasee5
Setting
micro plot triale5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“In micro plot trial, a general increase in all the growth parameters was observed in all the treatments receiving P. chlamydosporia except root weight that was greatest in control (Nematode only)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root weight of okra was greatest in the nematode-only control, not in the Pochonia chlamydosporia treatments.

Treatment
P. chlamydosporiae5
Outcome
root weighte5
Direction
greateste5
Comparator
control (Nematode only)e5
Setting
micro plot triale5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e5

“In micro plot trial, a general increase in all the growth parameters was observed in all the treatments receiving P. chlamydosporia except root weight that was greatest in control (Nematode only)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application at 30 g/plot at sowing with seed treatment at 3% w/w gave the highest recovery in plant vigour of okra compared with control.

Treatment
soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/we6
Outcome
plant vigore6
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest recovery in plant vigor with maximum reduction in nematode multiplication including final soil population was recorded in treatment that received soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/w over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application at 30 g/plot at sowing with seed treatment at 3% w/w gave the maximum reduction in nematode multiplication, including final soil population, compared with control.

Treatment
soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/we6
Interactor
nematodeNematodae6pathogen
Outcome
nematode multiplication including final soil populatione6
Direction
maximum reductione6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
e6

“The highest recovery in plant vigor with maximum reduction in nematode multiplication including final soil population was recorded in treatment that received soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/w over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1139 · show in text ↑

Pochonia chlamydosporia · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sowing time · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 53 positive, 6 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

77 papers: 75 positive, 2 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

73 papers more in this group

See all 77 papers →

seed treatment · Nematoda · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · Nematoda · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.