Abstract
Management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting okra was achieved through in-vitro, in-vivo and micro plot trials by an antagonistic fungus, Pochonia chlamydosporia. Effect of seed treatment and soil application of P. chlamydosporia was studied at various doses under in-vivo and micro plots. A 96% egg parasitism of M. incognita by P. chlamydosporia was recorded in laboratory condition. P. chlamydosporia caused significantly enhanced plant health and suppressed M.incognita population in all the treated plants. The highest recovery up to 81% in plant vigor was recorded in the treatment that received soil application of the P. chlamydosporia @ 3% w/w under pot trial. In micro plot trial, a general increase in all the growth parameters was observed in all the treatments receiving P. chlamydosporia except root weight that was greatest in control (Nematode only). The highest recovery in plant vigor with maximum reduction in nematode multiplication including final soil population was recorded in treatment that received soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/w over control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Management of Meloidogyne incognita on okra was achieved through in-vitro, in-vivo and micro plot trials using Pochonia chlamydosporia.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- an antagonistic fungus, Pochonia chlamydosporiae1
- Interactor
- Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae1pathogen - Second interactor
- Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae1biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- Management of root-knot nematodee1
- Direction
- was achievede1
- Setting
- in-vitro, in-vivo and micro plot trialse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e1“Management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infecting okra was achieved through in-vitro, in-vivo and micro plot trials by an antagonistic fungus, Pochonia chlamydosporia”
Claim · model-written summary
Pochonia chlamydosporia parasitised 96% of Meloidogyne incognita eggs in laboratory conditions.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Interactor
- M. incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae2pathogen - Second interactor
- P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae2biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- egg parasitisme2
- Value
- 96%e2
- Setting
- laboratory conditione2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e2“A 96% egg parasitism of M. incognita by P. chlamydosporia was recorded in laboratory condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Pochonia chlamydosporia significantly enhanced plant health of okra.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- P. chlamydosporiae3
- Outcome
- plant healthe3
- Direction
- significantly enhancede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e3“P. chlamydosporia caused significantly enhanced plant health and suppressed M.incognita population in all the treated plants”
Claim · model-written summary
Pochonia chlamydosporia suppressed the Meloidogyne incognita population in okra plants.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- P. chlamydosporiae3
- Interactor
- M.incognita
Meloidogyne incognitae3pathogen - Outcome
- M.incognita populatione3
- Direction
- suppressede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
_penetrates_a_tomato_root_-_USDA-ARS.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e3“P. chlamydosporia caused significantly enhanced plant health and suppressed M.incognita population in all the treated plants”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest recovery of plant vigour, up to 81%, was obtained with soil application of Pochonia chlamydosporia at 3% w/w under pot trial.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- soil application of the P. chlamydosporia @ 3% w/we4
- Interactor
- P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae4biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- plant vigore4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Value
- 81%e4
- Setting
- pot triale4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e4“The highest recovery up to 81% in plant vigor was recorded in the treatment that received soil application of the P. chlamydosporia @ 3% w/w under pot trial”
Claim · model-written summary
Pochonia chlamydosporia in micro plot trials generally increased all growth parameters of okra.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- P. chlamydosporiae5
- Outcome
- growth parameterse5
- Direction
- general increasee5
- Setting
- micro plot triale5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e5“In micro plot trial, a general increase in all the growth parameters was observed in all the treatments receiving P. chlamydosporia except root weight that was greatest in control (Nematode only)”
Claim · model-written summary
Root weight of okra was greatest in the nematode-only control, not in the Pochonia chlamydosporia treatments.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- P. chlamydosporiae5
- Outcome
- root weighte5
- Direction
- greateste5
- Comparator
- control (Nematode only)e5
- Setting
- micro plot triale5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e5“In micro plot trial, a general increase in all the growth parameters was observed in all the treatments receiving P. chlamydosporia except root weight that was greatest in control (Nematode only)”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil application at 30 g/plot at sowing with seed treatment at 3% w/w gave the highest recovery in plant vigour of okra compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/we6
- Outcome
- plant vigore6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Comparator
- controle6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e6“The highest recovery in plant vigor with maximum reduction in nematode multiplication including final soil population was recorded in treatment that received soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/w over control”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil application at 30 g/plot at sowing with seed treatment at 3% w/w gave the maximum reduction in nematode multiplication, including final soil population, compared with control.
- Taxon
- okra
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/we6
- Outcome
- nematode multiplication including final soil populatione6
- Direction
- maximum reductione6
- Comparator
- controle6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“Management of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita Using Pochonia chlamydosporia on Okra”
e6“The highest recovery in plant vigor with maximum reduction in nematode multiplication including final soil population was recorded in treatment that received soil application @ 30 g/plot at sowing time coupled with seed treatment @ 3% w/w over control”
The same questions in other papers
Pochonia chlamydosporia · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →sowing time · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →seed treatment · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →application · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
73 papers more in this group
See all 77 papers →seed treatment · Nematoda · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · Nematoda · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.