Paper · 2009 · Indian Journal Of Nematology

Compatibility of Pochonia chlamydosporia with nematicide and neem cake against root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita infesting okra.

S. C. Dhawan; Satyendra Singh

11
claims
29
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of antagonistic fungus, Pochonia chlamydosporia, a parasite of nematode eggs, neem cake and carbofuran alone and in combinations were evaluated in micro plots infested with Meloidogyne incognita on okra under net house condition. Plant growth parameters, fruit yield, root galling, egg production and final nematode population densities were determined after 90 days of germination. Heavy galling in the nematode alone treatment was observed resulted in highest root weight as compared to treated ones and healthy. All the treatments receiving any of the management components showed enhancement in plant growth and suppression of nematode multiplication. The effect of P. chlamydosporia (BCA) was recorded better than neem cake and at par with tested nematicide. The combined application of BCA with neem cake and/or carbofuran at reduced doses gave better recovery in comparison to either of the single application in terms of shoot length, shoot weight, root length and fruit yield and significantly (P<0.05) suppressed M. incognita in terms of galling, egg production, and soil population. The trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cake yielded significantly not only higher fresh fruit weight with a recovery of 53% but also recovered shoot weight up to 64% over control and suppressed root-knot disease severity in terms of galling, egg production and nematode population (89%, 90% and 81% respectively) with a marginal difference with dual application BCA and carbofuran.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated nematode infestation caused heavy galling and the highest root weight.

Treatment
nematode alone treatmente0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
Heavy gallinge0
Comparator
treated ones and healthye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Heavy galling in the nematode alone treatment was observed resulted in highest root weight as compared to treated ones and healthy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–524 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Any management component enhanced okra growth.

Treatment
any of the management componentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments receiving any of the management components showed enhancement in plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–622 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Any management component suppressed nematode multiplication.

Treatment
any of the management componentse0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Outcome
nematode multiplicatione0
Direction
suppressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the treatments receiving any of the management components showed enhancement in plant growth and suppression of nematode multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–665 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. chlamydosporia performed better than neem cake and similarly to carbofuran.

Treatment
P. chlamydosporia (BCA)e0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
effect of P. chlamydosporia (BCA)e0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
neem cakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of P. chlamydosporia (BCA) was recorded better than neem cake and at par with tested nematicide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 667–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined BCA with neem cake or carbofuran improved shoot and root dimensions and fruit yield over single applications.

Treatment
combined application of BCA with neem cake and/or carbofuran at reduced dosese0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae1pathogen
Second interactor
Pochonia chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot length, shoot weight, root length and fruit yielde0
Direction
better recoverye0
Comparator
either of the single applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined application of BCA with neem cake and/or carbofuran at reduced doses gave better recovery in comparison to either of the single application in terms of shoot length, shoot weight, root length and fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–995 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pochonia chlamydosporia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatments significantly suppressed nematode galling, egg production and soil population.

Treatment
combined application of BCA with neem cake and/or carbofuran at reduced dosese1
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
M. incognita in terms of galling, egg production, and soil populatione0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly (P<0.05) suppressed M. incognita in terms of galling, egg production, and soil population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1103 · show in text ↑
e1

“combined application of BCA with neem cake and/or carbofuran at reduced doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–856 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-component treatment increased fresh fruit weight by 53% over control.

Treatment
trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cakee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
fresh fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
53%e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cake yielded significantly not only higher fresh fruit weight with a recovery of 53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1252 · show in text ↑
e1

“over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1307 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-component treatment increased shoot weight by 64% over control.

Treatment
trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cakee1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Second interactor
P. chlamydosporiaPochonia chlamydosporiae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
recoverede0
Value
64%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recovered shoot weight up to 64% over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1307 · show in text ↑
e1

“trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1172 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-component treatment suppressed galling by 89%.

Treatment
trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cakee1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Outcome
gallinge0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
89%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suppressed root-knot disease severity in terms of galling, egg production and nematode population (89%, 90% and 81% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1172 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-component treatment suppressed egg production by 90%.

Treatment
trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cakee1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Outcome
egg productione0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suppressed root-knot disease severity in terms of galling, egg production and nematode population (89%, 90% and 81% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1172 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The three-component treatment suppressed nematode population by 81%.

Treatment
trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cakee1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae2pathogen
Outcome
nematode populatione0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
81%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suppressed root-knot disease severity in terms of galling, egg production and nematode population (89%, 90% and 81% respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1441 · show in text ↑
e1

“trio combination of P. chlamydosporia, carbofuran and neem cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1172 · show in text ↑
e2

“Meloidogyne incognita on okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–213 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Pochonia chlamydosporia · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · Meloidogyne incognita · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.