Paper · 2009 · Indian Journal of Soil Conservation

Effects of biofertilizers on soil moisture, nutrient status and fruit productivity under organic cultivation of apple in Himachal Pradesh

M. L. Verma; Charan Singh; S. P. Bhardwaj

10
claims
29
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted during 2004 and 2005 at the research farm of Regional Horticultural Research Station, Mashobra, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh to study soil moisture distribution, nutrient content and apple productivity under organic farming technology by using organic manure and FYM. Results revealed that the improvement in soil moisture availability, pH, organic carbon and nutrient status of the soil was significant under organic manure. Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yield were recorded maximum with application of organic manure @ 5 kg tree−1 (T3) during 2004, T4 (organic manure @ 10 kg tree−1) during 2005 and T2 (Farm Yard Manure @ 100 kg tree−1) during both of years of experimentation while minimum under T1 (without manure - control) during 2004 and 2005. Soil moisture, pH, organic carbon and available N, P and K were recorded maximum under T2 (Farm Yard Manure @ 100 kg tree−1) and T6 (organic manure @ 20 kg tree−1) during 2004 and 2005. Better quality Apple fruits were also recorded under T3 during 2004, T4 during 2005 and T2 during both the years of experimentation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure significantly improved soil moisture, pH, carbon and nutrients.

Treatment
organic manuree0
Outcome
soil moisture availability, pH, organic carbon and nutrient status of the soile0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the improvement in soil moisture availability, pH, organic carbon and nutrient status of the soil was significant under organic manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure at 5 kg per tree maximized growth, fruit traits and yield in 2004.

Treatment
organic manure @ 5 kg tree−1 (T3)e0
Outcome
Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yield were recorded maximum with application of organic manure @ 5 kg tree−1 (T3) during 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–595 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure at 10 kg per tree maximized growth, fruit traits and yield in 2005.

Treatment
organic manure @ 10 kg tree−1e0
Outcome
Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yielde1
Direction
maximume1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 (organic manure @ 10 kg tree−1) during 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yield were recorded maximum with application of organic manure @ 5 kg tree−1 (T3) during 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm yard manure at 100 kg per tree maximized growth, fruit traits and yield in both years.

Treatment
Farm Yard Manure @ 100 kg tree−1e0
Outcome
Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
without manure - controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 (Farm Yard Manure @ 100 kg tree−1) during both of years of experimentation while minimum under T1 (without manure - control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yield were recorded maximum with application of organic manure @ 5 kg tree−1 (T3) during 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without manure, growth, fruit traits and yield were lowest.

Treatment
without manure - controle0
Outcome
Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yielde1
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“minimum under T1 (without manure - control) during 2004 and 2005.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–797 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Growth parameters, fruit characteristics and yield were recorded maximum with application of organic manure @ 5 kg tree−1 (T3) during 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Farm yard manure at 100 kg per tree maximized soil moisture, pH, carbon and NPK.

Treatment
Farm Yard Manure @ 100 kg tree−1e0
Outcome
Soil moisture, pH, organic carbon and available N, P and Ke0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture, pH, organic carbon and available N, P and K were recorded maximum under T2 (Farm Yard Manure @ 100 kg tree−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic manure at 20 kg per tree maximized soil moisture, pH, carbon and NPK.

Treatment
organic manure @ 20 kg tree−1e0
Outcome
Soil moisture, pH, organic carbon and available N, P and Ke0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil moisture, pH, organic carbon and available N, P and K were recorded maximum under T2 (Farm Yard Manure @ 100 kg tree−1) and T6 (organic manure @ 20 kg tree−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 5 kg organic manure treatment improved apple fruit quality in 2004.

Treatment
T3e0
Outcome
Better quality Apple fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Better quality Apple fruits were also recorded under T3 during 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1051 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 10 kg organic manure treatment improved apple fruit quality in 2005.

Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
Better quality Apple fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 during 2005”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Better quality Apple fruits were also recorded under T3 during 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1051 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The farmyard manure treatment improved apple fruit quality in both years.

Treatment
T2e0
Outcome
Better quality Apple fruitse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T2 during both the years of experimentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
t1

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–117 · show in text ↑
e1

“Better quality Apple fruits were also recorded under T3 during 2004”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1051 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

117 papers: 86 positive, 31 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

fertilization · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

178 papers: 150 positive, 28 negative or no effect

149 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

174 papers more in this group

See all 178 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.