Paper · 2010 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Comparative evaluation of organic and non-organic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) production systems

M. V. Venugopalan; T. P. Rajendran; P. Chandran; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The sustainability of organic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) based production system vis-a -vis non-organic system under low input, semi-arid pedo-climatic conditions was evaluated during 2001 through 2005 on farmers' fields in Yavatmal district, Maharashtra. Mean yield of cotton, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek], soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) were either similar or slightly higher under the organic system than the non-organic system. The organic system also had a higher diversity index (4.3) than the non-organic system (2.9). Organic cultivation practices did not improve fibre quality parameters. Samples from 4 soil pedons and 56 surface soils were analyzed in 2001 and again in 2005. Soils from non-organic pedons had a higher pH and ex-Na, whereas the organic carbon content was higher under organic system. During both the sampling periods, the mean organic carbon and available Zn were significantly higher in the organic system. All the soils were calcareous but the proportion of organic to total carbon was higher in organic system and between sampling periods, this increased from 54.5 to 57.5%. Thus, adoption of organic production practices improved the biophysical sustainability of the low input systems prevailing in semi-arid pedo-climatic conditions of the region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield was similar or slightly higher under the organic system than the non-organic system.

Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
Mean yield of cottone0
Direction
similar or slightly highere0
Comparator
non-organic systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield of cotton, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek], soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) were either similar or slightly higher under the organic system than the non-organic system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mungbean yield was similar or slightly higher under the organic system.

Taxon
mungbeanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
Mean yield of cotton, mungbeane0
Direction
similar or slightly highere0
Comparator
non-organic systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield of cotton, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek], soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) were either similar or slightly higher under the organic system than the non-organic system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean yield was similar or slightly higher under the organic system.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
Mean yielde0
Direction
similar or slightly highere0
Comparator
non-organic systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield of cotton, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek], soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) were either similar or slightly higher under the organic system than the non-organic system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea yield was similar or slightly higher under the organic system.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
Mean yielde0
Direction
similar or slightly highere0
Comparator
non-organic systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean yield of cotton, mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek], soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) were either similar or slightly higher under the organic system than the non-organic system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–481 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The organic system had a higher diversity index, 4.3 versus 2.9.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Outcome
diversity indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.3e0
Qualifier
2.9e0
Comparator
non-organic systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The organic system also had a higher diversity index (4.3) than the non-organic system (2.9).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–575 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic cultivation practices did not improve fibre quality parameters.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
Organic cultivation practicese0
Outcome
fibre quality parameterse0
Direction
did not improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic cultivation practices did not improve fibre quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-organic pedons had higher soil pH and exchangeable sodium.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
non-organic pedonse0
Outcome
pH and ex-Nae0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soils from non-organic pedons had a higher pH and ex-Na, whereas the organic carbon content was higher under organic system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic-system soils had higher organic carbon content.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
organic carbon contente0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soils from non-organic pedons had a higher pH and ex-Na, whereas the organic carbon content was higher under organic system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–861 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean soil organic carbon was significantly higher in the organic system in both sampling periods.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
mean organic carbone0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
both the sampling periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During both the sampling periods, the mean organic carbon and available Zn were significantly higher in the organic system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean available soil Zn was significantly higher in the organic system in both sampling periods.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
available Zne0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
both the sampling periodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During both the sampling periods, the mean organic carbon and available Zn were significantly higher in the organic system.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The organic-to-total soil carbon proportion was higher in the organic system and rose from 54.5 to 57.5% between sampling periods.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
organic systeme0
Outcome
proportion of organic to total carbone0
Direction
highere0
Value
54.5 to 57.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the soils were calcareous but the proportion of organic to total carbon was higher in organic system and between sampling periods, this increased from 54.5 to 57.5%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adopting organic production practices improved biophysical sustainability of low-input systems in the region.

Taxon
cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)Gossypium hirsutumt0
Treatment
organic production practicese0
Outcome
biophysical sustainabilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, adoption of organic production practices improved the biophysical sustainability of the low input systems prevailing in semi-arid pedo-climatic conditions of the region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–77 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 25 positive, 5 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 35 positive, 28 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.