Paper · 2010 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Effects of cultural system (organic and conventional) on growth and fiber quality of two cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) varieties

Dimitrios Bilalis; Sotiria Patsiali; Anestis Karkanis; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Organic cotton is a new industrial crop product. Field experiments were conducted to determine the effects of cultural systems and varieties on the growth, fiber quality and yield components of cotton crop ( Gossypium hirsutum L.). The experiments, conducted during 2006 and 2007, were laid out in a split plot design with four replicates, two main plots (organic and conventional system) and two sub-plots (cotton varieties: Athena and Campo). There were no significant differences between the organic and conventional system for cotton growth, yield and fiber quality. The results suggest that the soil N released from both the inorganic (80:40:40 kg ha −1 N:P 2 O 5 :K 2 O) and organic pool (green manure) were sufficient to maintain good growth. Inferior-quality fiber was produced in the variety. Campo, which had the lowest fiber fineness (micronaire), strength, length and reflection. In addition, this variety had the highest fiber elongation and yellowness. There were no significant differences between varieties as far as uniformity and leaf trash ratio are concerned. A positive correlation was observed between fiber strength and length. However, a negative correlation was found between lint yield and fiber strength.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic and conventional systems showed no significant differences in growth, yield or fiber quality.

Treatment
organice0
Outcome
cotton growth, yield and fiber qualitye0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
conventional systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences between the organic and conventional system for cotton growth, yield and fiber quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–579 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer both fertilizer pools supplied sufficient N for good growth.

Outcome
good growthe0
Qualifier
soil N releasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the soil N released from both the inorganic (80:40:40 kg ha −1 N:P 2 O 5 :K 2 O) and organic pool (green manure) were sufficient to maintain good growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Campo produced inferior fiber with the lowest fineness, strength, length and reflection.

Material
Campoe0
Outcome
fiber fineness (micronaire), strength, length and reflectione0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inferior-quality fiber was produced in the variety. Campo, which had the lowest fiber fineness (micronaire), strength, length and reflection.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–900 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Campo had the highest fiber elongation and yellowness.

Outcome
fiber elongation and yellownesse0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this variety had the highest fiber elongation and yellowness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–975 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Varieties did not significantly differ in uniformity and leaf trash ratio.

Material
varietiese0
Outcome
uniformity and leaf trash ratioe0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences between varieties as far as uniformity and leaf trash ratio are concerned.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fiber strength correlated positively with length.

Organ / stage
fibere0
Outcome
fiber strengthe0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A positive correlation was observed between fiber strength and length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1159 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint yield correlated negatively with fiber strength.

Organ / stage
fibere0
Outcome
lint yielde0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a negative correlation was found between lint yield and fiber strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1240 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.