Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Xylem ureides and glutamine declined sharply on flooding day one.

A claim from Aerenchyma Formation and Recovery from Hypoxia of the Flooded Root System of Nodulated Soybean · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xylem ureides and glutamine declined sharply on flooding day one.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
floodinge0
Outcome
xylem ureides and glutaminee0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on the first day of flooding there was a sharp decline in xylem ureides and glutamine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1474
t0

“soybean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 87–94

Title

Aerenchyma Formation and Recovery from Hypoxia of the Flooded Root System of Nodulated Soybean

A. L. THOMAS; S. M. C. GUERREIRO; L. SODEK Annals of Botany 2005. doi:10.1093/aob/mci272

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-eec57ee991237eb98805d66a5f5b0bf002d2653cea097daf32b76302c836abc3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

flooding · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 4 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.