Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The mild to moderate water deficit during berry set caused a greater reduction in berry size and weight than the more severe water deficit at veraison.

A claim from Impact of Drought Stress Timing and Intensity on Physiological Performance and Wine Quality in Two White Grapevine Cultivars Planted in a Mountain Vineyard · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mild to moderate water deficit during berry set caused a greater reduction in berry size and weight than the more severe water deficit at veraison.

Taxon
grapevineVitise0
Treatment
the mild to moderate water deficit during berry sete2
Outcome
berry size and weighte2
Direction
greater reductione2
Comparator
the more severe water deficit at veraisone2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study evaluated the effect of drought stress on two grapevine cultivars (Sauvignon Blanc and Chardonnay) under irrigated and rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–389
e2

“the mild to moderate water deficit during berry set caused a greater reduction in berry size and weight, and consequently in yield, than the more severe water deficit at veraison”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1159

Title

Impact of Drought Stress Timing and Intensity on Physiological Performance and Wine Quality in Two White Grapevine Cultivars Planted in a Mountain Vineyard

Fadwa Benyahia; Carina Veronica Gonzalez; Ahmed Ben Abdelkader; et al. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 2026. doi:10.1155/ajgw/6920071

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e8b0da5f0fc28fa12cdf8ad6b65984b43f817c83aa2d0dcb19000a3cf4250be3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

drought · yield · VitisResults differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.